The Tulsa Forum by TulsaNow

Talk About Tulsa => Development & New Businesses => Topic started by: cannon_fodder on July 24, 2008, 09:03:31 AM

Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: cannon_fodder on July 24, 2008, 09:03:31 AM
It was a proposal with a firm date, the date was extended, then it was a deal that needed approval, got another extension, the tax approval got passed and ground was set to break, then a injunction was filed...  then the name sake donor went Bankrupt (couldn't they have waited another month!):

quote:

It is no secret that SemGroup LP and the Tom and Julie Kivisto Family Foundation were strong supporters of the new baseball park -- a pledge of $7.5 million and naming rights were in the works -- as well as other charitable organizations and arts groups.

http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/1777606/

Anyone know where this project is now?  Please no debate on the merits of the project here, just if you know or have any idea of what the status is.  It would be GREAT if Kivisto himself ponied up some cash or some other corporate entity stepped up to the plate.

But I've heard nothing substantive on this project since SemGroup starting shaking last week.
Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: SXSW on July 24, 2008, 09:07:48 AM
Yeah I wondered the same thing as it was going to be SemGroup Ballpark and now that company is bankrupt.  Maybe Quiktrip, Williams, ONEOK, DollarThrifty, etc. will step up to plate now.
Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: Renaissance on July 24, 2008, 01:45:18 PM
Wait wait wait - did they succeed in getting an injunction, or just file the motion?  I didn't see this news yet.  Linky?
Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: cannon_fodder on July 24, 2008, 02:44:30 PM
As far as I know, just the motion.  I have not followed it that closely.  My point was merely that it has been a see-saw lately and I don't know what's going on.

Lawsuit links:
http://www.ktul.com/news/stories/0708/535767.html
http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?subjectID=16&articleID=20080718_11_A13_hTheyw971060


Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: Double A on July 24, 2008, 02:50:20 PM
Isn't Lamson holding up the deal?
Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: inteller on July 24, 2008, 05:12:00 PM
i think when this next extension is up Lamson owes it to Jenks to work an exclusive deal.  He already signed a non binding letter of intent.
Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: sgrizzle on July 24, 2008, 09:11:27 PM
quote:
Originally posted by inteller

i think when this next extension is up Lamson owes it to Jenks to work an exclusive deal.  He already signed a non binding letter of intent.



Even the developers in Jenks know that bird has flown.

About Semgroup's donation, keep in mind that corporate donations are generally from the "so-and-so" foundation and not the daily cash flow of the company. Also keep in mind that bankruptcy as it applies to corporation means restructuring/protection and doesn't mean they're boarding up the windows.
Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: Rico on July 24, 2008, 09:27:00 PM
quote:
Originally posted by sgrizzle

quote:
Originally posted by inteller

i think when this next extension is up Lamson owes it to Jenks to work an exclusive deal.  He already signed a non binding letter of intent.



Even the developers in Jenks know that bird has flown.

About Semgroup's donation, keep in mind that corporate donations are generally from the "so-and-so" foundation and not the daily cash flow of the company. Also keep in mind that bankruptcy as it applies to corporation means restructuring/protection and doesn't mean they're boarding up the windows.




That is soooo non conspiracy man....

How you gonna feed a bear on that pooh..?

[}:)]
Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: sgrizzle on July 25, 2008, 10:27:42 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Rico

quote:
Originally posted by sgrizzle

quote:
Originally posted by inteller

i think when this next extension is up Lamson owes it to Jenks to work an exclusive deal.  He already signed a non binding letter of intent.



Even the developers in Jenks know that bird has flown.

About Semgroup's donation, keep in mind that corporate donations are generally from the "so-and-so" foundation and not the daily cash flow of the company. Also keep in mind that bankruptcy as it applies to corporation means restructuring/protection and doesn't mean they're boarding up the windows.




That is soooo non conspiracy man....

How you gonna feed a bear on that pooh..?

[}:)]



The only bear on this board is full of enough pooh.
Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: MDepr2007 on July 25, 2008, 11:03:17 AM
What ballpark... I've not seen enough to beleive in one yet.
Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: inteller on July 25, 2008, 07:10:40 PM
quote:
Originally posted by sgrizzle

quote:
Originally posted by inteller

i think when this next extension is up Lamson owes it to Jenks to work an exclusive deal.  He already signed a non binding letter of intent.



Even the developers in Jenks know that bird has flown.

About Semgroup's donation, keep in mind that corporate donations are generally from the "so-and-so" foundation and not the daily cash flow of the company. Also keep in mind that bankruptcy as it applies to corporation means restructuring/protection and doesn't mean they're boarding up the windows.



uh yeah, in this case they are boarding up the windows....or probably selling them.
Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: tulsa1603 on July 28, 2008, 08:43:43 AM
quote:
Originally posted by cannon_fodder

It was a proposal with a firm date, the date was extended, then it was a deal that needed approval, got another extension, the tax approval got passed and ground was set to break, then a injunction was filed...  then the name sake donor went Bankrupt (couldn't they have waited another month!):

quote:

It is no secret that SemGroup LP and the Tom and Julie Kivisto Family Foundation were strong supporters of the new baseball park -- a pledge of $7.5 million and naming rights were in the works -- as well as other charitable organizations and arts groups.

http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/1777606/

Anyone know where this project is now?  Please no debate on the merits of the project here, just if you know or have any idea of what the status is.  It would be GREAT if Kivisto himself ponied up some cash or some other corporate entity stepped up to the plate.

But I've heard nothing substantive on this project since SemGroup starting shaking last week.



My understanding is that they are going to have to find another source for the $7.5 million.  Which honestly, with as many generous people as we have in Tulsa, shouldn't be too terribly difficult.  I just want them to start.  Yesterday.

Come on, everyone in Tulsa, pony up $20.
Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: carltonplace on July 28, 2008, 10:27:27 AM
Tell me where to send it. I'll cover Double A too.
Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: Double A on July 28, 2008, 08:49:01 PM
quote:
Originally posted by carltonplace

Tell me where to send it. I'll cover Double A too.



Or they could just move the existing stadium instead.
Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: TheArtist on July 28, 2008, 10:38:55 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Double A

quote:
Originally posted by carltonplace

Tell me where to send it. I'll cover Double A too.



Or they could just move the existing stadium instead.



Ummm, no. You need something that looks nice over there, not butt ugly and cheap. I will chip in 200 just let me know where to send the money.

Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: Renaissance on July 29, 2008, 07:38:27 AM
You know, maybe they really should open the thing up to small donors!  The number of Tulsans willing to donate $100 toward a city-owned ballpark, built right in the Brady, is probably pretty high.  Now, that might not cover all of SemGroup's $7.5 million, but it would be a good start and likely to increase popular support for the plan, once more people had a stake in the sucker.  They could do one of those big bronze plaques listing all the donors, large and small.

I'll email the Mayor.
Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: TURobY on July 29, 2008, 08:32:19 AM
I was thinking the same thing. I've always liked the "Buy-a-Brick" programs because it gives people a sense of buy-in and the ability to point and show their contribution to the city.
Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: deinstein on July 29, 2008, 05:33:57 PM
Enron Field'd
Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: cannon_fodder on July 30, 2008, 09:06:08 AM
quote:
Originally posted by deinstein

Enron Field'd



1) Those in the know are calling it "SemRon"  
[;)]

2) I have no information saying the deal is sunk.  The basic question of this thread remains open.  Where are our leaders?  Shouldn't they either be letting us down softly or telling us it will all be OK?
Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: TheArtist on July 31, 2008, 08:52:20 AM
Rumor has it that Tulsa is not getting the Micky Mantle Museum, OKC is.  Anyone heard about that?

Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: cannon_fodder on July 31, 2008, 10:22:52 AM
The family of Mantle is talking to Bricktown and the Redhawks on the museum.  

quote:
The Oklahoman first reported in May that the Mantle family had visited Oklahoma City and was interested in establishing a museum in Bricktown. The entertainment district has multiple tributes to Mantle, including a statue, his image on seats at the AT&T Bricktown Ballpark, a Mickey Mantle Steakhouse — all located along Mickey Mantle Drive.
. . .
the task of building a museum is "easy." He also said residents should not assume that construction of a museum will require public funding.

Jim Cowan, director of the Bricktown Association, said merchants and property owners are eager to see the museum become a reality.

"We know what the museum would mean to the district, not just in terms of business, but also in terms of prestige," Cowan said. "Had the NBA not announced they were coming into town right away, it would be the biggest story today in Bricktown. This is absolutely what we want — it would complement what's already down here and focuses not just local and regional attention but national attention on Bricktown for what it has to offer."



http://newsok.com/redhawks-mantle-family-holding-talks-on-museumbrspan-classhl2redhawks-baseballspan/article/3277109/

Oklahoma City wants it.  Oklahoma City will get it.  I'd say it's pretty well a forgone conclusion.  They can get their sh!t together to get get the population, businesses, city leaders and money behind a project and make it happen.  Tulsa has not shown it can do the same.

10:1 it ends up in OKC.
Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: Friendly Bear on July 31, 2008, 10:36:54 AM
quote:
Originally posted by sgrizzle

quote:
Originally posted by Rico

quote:
Originally posted by sgrizzle

quote:
Originally posted by inteller

i think when this next extension is up Lamson owes it to Jenks to work an exclusive deal.  He already signed a non binding letter of intent.



Even the developers in Jenks know that bird has flown.

About Semgroup's donation, keep in mind that corporate donations are generally from the "so-and-so" foundation and not the daily cash flow of the company. Also keep in mind that bankruptcy as it applies to corporation means restructuring/protection and doesn't mean they're boarding up the windows.




That is soooo non conspiracy man....

How you gonna feed a bear on that pooh..?

[}:)]



The only bear on this board is full of enough pooh.



Am not.

Is it lunch time, yet?

Send more tourists; the last one was DELICIOUS!
Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: TheArtist on July 31, 2008, 01:18:50 PM
Well that sucks, but its to be expected.


Title: State of the Ballpark (?)
Post by: Renaissance on July 31, 2008, 01:41:17 PM
quote:
Originally posted by cannon_fodder

The family of Mantle is talking to Bricktown and the Redhawks on the museum.  

quote:
The Oklahoman first reported in May that the Mantle family had visited Oklahoma City and was interested in establishing a museum in Bricktown. The entertainment district has multiple tributes to Mantle, including a statue, his image on seats at the AT&T Bricktown Ballpark, a Mickey Mantle Steakhouse — all located along Mickey Mantle Drive.
. . .
the task of building a museum is "easy." He also said residents should not assume that construction of a museum will require public funding.

Jim Cowan, director of the Bricktown Association, said merchants and property owners are eager to see the museum become a reality.

"We know what the museum would mean to the district, not just in terms of business, but also in terms of prestige," Cowan said. "Had the NBA not announced they were coming into town right away, it would be the biggest story today in Bricktown. This is absolutely what we want — it would complement what's already down here and focuses not just local and regional attention but national attention on Bricktown for what it has to offer."



http://newsok.com/redhawks-mantle-family-holding-talks-on-museumbrspan-classhl2redhawks-baseballspan/article/3277109/

Oklahoma City wants it.  Oklahoma City will get it.  I'd say it's pretty well a forgone conclusion.  They can get their sh!t together to get get the population, businesses, city leaders and money behind a project and make it happen.  Tulsa has not shown it can do the same.

10:1 it ends up in OKC.



This is probably right.  EDIT:  I actually don't think this is right at all.  I think this is a one-sided, poorly reported story that doesn't accurately convey the state of talks regarding the Mantle museum.  I think it's a story by a booster of downtown OKC trying to squelch internet rumors that Tulsa is getting the museum.  I'll point out two things about that story:

1) Steve Lackmeyer wrote the thing.  He also maintains a blog on downtown OKC for newsok.com and recently wrote a post urging the Redhawks to seize this opportunity.  http://blog.newsok.com/okccentral/2008/05/27/im-amazed/.   My guess is he saw some posts on OKCTalk regarding Tulsa's goal to get the thing (posted by, um, a regular poster of this board calling him out: http://www.okctalk.com/okc-metro-area-talk/13604-tulsa-wants-wnba-franchise-good-move-2.html#post157637) and decided to check up on things.

2) Read the story closely:  http://newsok.com/redhawks-mantle-family-holding-talks-on-museumbrspan-classhl2redhawks-baseballspan/article/3277109/  THERE IS NO NEWS HERE.  It's a status piece that uses some fresh quotes from Redhawks owner Scott Pruitt who claims that "talks are ongoing."  But where's the quote from the Mantle family?  Oh, there's not one.  Where's the "no comment" from the Mantle family?  Oh, there's not one.  Did Lackmeyer even contact them to find out where they were at on things?  I don't know, but he doesn't say so.

This OKC booster-journalist saw an opportunity to make it appear that OKC was getting the museum.  He apparently didn't contact the Mantle family, nor did he mention Tulsa's competing efforts for the museum, which apparenly would give it a freestanding building in the Brady as opposed to an add-on in a stadium plaza.

The story is a badly reported fluff piece.  Call me when somebody talks to the Mantle family.