I've noticed they have been removing the old sign from the building. Anyone know what is going on there?
Quote from: custosnox on July 17, 2013, 10:41:52 AM
I've noticed they have been removing the old sign from the building. Anyone know what is going on there?
Sounds like they are removing the old sign.
Quote from: Conan71 on July 17, 2013, 10:51:09 AM
Sounds like they are removing the old sign.
Or a sign removal project of some kind to remove the sign so the sign isn't there so another sign can be put up but it could be a sign replacement of some sort designed to replace the sign that was replaced during a previous sign replacement project so they have a replaceable sign in place for future replacement through a funded sign replacement project.
Quote from: Conan71 on July 17, 2013, 10:51:09 AM
Sounds like they are removing the old sign.
And here I was hoping the sarcasm would be avoided... wait, I forgot where I was. Anyhow, in all seriousness, has anyone heard anything about happenings in the building?
Quote from: custosnox on July 17, 2013, 11:28:49 AM
And here I was hoping the sarcasm would be avoided... wait, I forgot where I was. Anyhow, in all seriousness, has anyone heard anything about happenings in the building?
I got nothing but sarcasm on that one.
Here's the last thread on the building
http://www.tulsanow.org/forum/index.php?topic=17499
Apparently FUMC now owns it...
(no, I don't assume anyone knows what FUMC stands for)
Interesting it would be removed. It is my understanding that another sign can't go up there by city ordinance. The existing sign was grandfathered in.
Quote from: AngieBrumley on July 17, 2013, 12:28:05 PM
Interesting it would be removed. It is my understanding that another sign can't go up there by city ordinance. The existing sign was grandfathered in.
Which typically means they would only be allowed to maintain the sign or restore it to it's original condition. Not change it to say "First United Methodist," "widget co" or whatever. I could be wrong.
Interesting facts about the sign:
The sign itself weighed 20,000 pounds and the pylon weighed 8,800 pounds. That weight and the additional weight of the support beams added nearly 30,000 pounds to the top of the building.
Quote from: AngieBrumley on July 22, 2013, 09:49:49 AM
Interesting facts about the sign:
The sign itself weighed 20,000 pounds and the pylon weighed 8,800 pounds. That weight and the additional weight of the support beams added nearly 30,000 pounds to the top of the building.
So there shouldn't be any structural problems with putting one hell of a party spot on the roof there then.
Quote from: custosnox on July 22, 2013, 05:08:20 PM
So there shouldn't be any structural problems with putting one hell of a party spot on the roof there then.
Do Methodists party (yes, I realize that meth is part of their name)?
I went up in this building once. The downtown views were outstanding. People would pay good money to rent or own condos in this building. *hint hint*
Quote from: SXSW on July 24, 2013, 01:34:28 PM
I went up in this building once. The downtown views were outstanding. People would pay good money to rent or own condos in this building. *hint hint*
God I hope they don't level it.
If you see these guys walking around, you know the days are numbered for the building.
http://www.dykon-explosivedemolition.com/ (http://www.dykon-explosivedemolition.com/)
I used to work in that building and they said that sign used to turn. It was right above the executives and it made a bunch of noise so it didn't last long before they shut it down. The first 3 floors are very old and then they added the 9 floors above it later. They spent a fortune on network cabling before selling it and moving.