The Tulsa Forum by TulsaNow

Talk About Tulsa => Development & New Businesses => Topic started by: Tulsasaurus Rex on November 25, 2015, 12:32:45 pm



Title: South Midtown?
Post by: Tulsasaurus Rex on November 25, 2015, 12:32:45 pm
Quote
The Press Club pushed three or four tables together to accommodate all of us, nearly every seat taken by somebody born and raised in Tulsa or somebody who has lived here long enough to qualify for honorary lifetime status. The age demographic skewed a little toward the “young professional” crowd, but with a few gray hairs spread around, too — most notably on my own head.

After a few minutes of small talk, somebody mentioned house hunting, which naturally prompted a question about what neighborhoods were being considered.

“I’d like to stay in South Midtown,” the house hunter said, mentioning a few specific possibilities that were all south of 51st Street.

“Excuse me,” I interrupted. “Did you mean to say south of Midtown?”

No, she insisted. South Midtown.

So I asked these friends and acquaintances of mine how many of them were familiar with such a place and where I could find it. Roughly half of them had never heard of it before, while the other half declared that there is indeed a part of Tulsa known as South Midtown. A couple of them even claimed to live there, although the boundaries seemed rather vague.

After listening to them try to describe it for a while, I proposed defining it as “pretty much any part of South Tulsa developed before 2005.”

“Well,” one of them objected, “maybe before 1995. It’s hard to say.”

This was actually the second time within a week that I had heard someone use the term South Midtown, the first coming with directions to a business near 81st Street and Yale Avenue. Of course, being the Midtown snob that I am — is Midtown snob redundant? — I assumed this was just a business trying to appropriate some caché, the way places on South Peoria Avenue stretch the definition of Brookside.

But maybe there’s something to this South Midtown thing after all. As suburban development inches ever closer to the Red River, the older parts of South Tulsa are taking on a unique character of their own, still not as traditional or as walkable as parts of Midtown itself, but not as squeaky clean and spread-out as the newest subdivisions along 121st Street, either. The architecture and development patterns are recognizably late 20th century, not early 21st. And over time, that difference is only going to become more noticeable.

As a human body grows, cells split and divide. So, too, a city. What we might be witnessing here is the emergence of two distinct areas where there used to be only one — South Midtown and New South Tulsa. Or maybe we should call them South Midtown and North Plano.

http://www.tulsaworld.com/homepagelatest/michael-overall-does-tulsa-really-have-a-south-midtown/article_4dfd145c-11f5-5512-9b36-c489cd33a7b4.html

How 'bout it, TN? Does this neighborhood exist? If so, where is it?


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: SXSW on November 25, 2015, 12:46:10 pm
I know realtors are trying to sell the neighborhoods around Southern Hills and Lafortune Park as "south midtown".  To me everything south of I-44 is south Tulsa, with the older parts generally north of the Creek.  I'm a big fan of the neighborhoods along 71st between Yale and Lewis, really hilly and forested with a lot of unique homes.  Though hardly any walkability like the rest of south Tulsa.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: Breadburner on November 25, 2015, 01:01:47 pm
No Midtown Past 51st....Or Yale....


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: TulsaGoldenHurriCAN on November 25, 2015, 01:17:07 pm
No Midtown Past 51st....Or Yale....

I agree. I remember seeing someone's listing on Airbnb at ~55th & Memorial calling it a "midtown" home. That neighborhood has none of the charm, walkability, character or history of midtown. Midtown is basically synonymous with Old Town. I like the definition of 1940's neighborhoods and earlier. Those are the neighborhoods and areas designed before cars were ubiquitous and when location was a premium so there was a lot of walkability.

If there is a "South Midtown" it is Brookside and the neighborhoods around Edison. Anyone who calls something south of 51st midtown just sounds like they're trying too hard to be cool and it comes across as cringey. Like building maintenance men calling themselves "engineers".


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: TulsaGoldenHurriCAN on November 25, 2015, 01:23:49 pm
No Midtown Past 51st....Or Yale....

Although White City is just east of Yale and is one of the definitive classic Tudor/bungalow-style brick house neighborhoods with a pond.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: Conan71 on November 25, 2015, 01:56:24 pm
Although White City is just east of Yale and is one of the definitive classic Tudor/bungalow-style brick house neighborhoods with a pond.

White City??!!

That’s just racist!


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: Breadburner on November 25, 2015, 06:43:57 pm
Although White City is just east of Yale and is one of the definitive classic Tudor/bungalow-style brick house neighborhoods with a pond.

I will allow it....


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: Dspike on November 26, 2015, 11:31:22 am
I've never heard the term before the World article, but I think it makes sense to have a new regional name. Most commenters seem to be focused on what is midtown. Here's a different angle. South of I-44 or 51st is now 7-10 miles of growth. There are significant differences in the 70s-80s growth (i.e. near Woodland Hills) and the 2000-2010 growth (i.e. near Tulsa Hills). What was "South Tulsa" in the 1980s is no longer the furthest South development in town.

Distinguishing between those two growth spurts make sense. Not sure what proper names would be, but "South Tulsa" and "Far South Tulsa" or "Midtown South" and "South Tulsa" could make sense. We seem to favor literal names (i.e. Inner-Dispersal Loop, Broken Arrow Expressway, "North Tulsa," "West Tulsa," Riverparks, etc).


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: Tulsasaurus Rex on November 26, 2015, 03:04:44 pm
This does raise a fun question: What should different neighborhoods of South Tulsa be called and where should their borders be drawn?

I think some of those names already exist. Southern Hills and Tulsa Hills are used for neighborhoods in addition to a country club and a shopping center. Most people know what I mean when I say Shadow Mountain. Some people know Coke Bottle Mountain and Signal Hill. Any others?


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: SXSW on November 26, 2015, 05:49:27 pm
Most, if not all, of the 70's and 80's neighborhoods from 51st to 91st in south Tulsa have names.  Just go by those similar to the midtown neighborhoods.  For example the neighborhood I grew up in is Minshall Park, which surrounds the park of the same name between 71st/81st and Yale/Sheridan. 


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: joiei on November 27, 2015, 12:39:35 am
I tell people that I live in Lower Midtown,  51st and Yale is the closest major intersection. They all just laugh. 


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: carltonplace on November 27, 2015, 09:57:15 am
South Midtown sounds needy and desperate as if they need validation to live in South Tulsa. Either own where you live or move to midtown.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: DowntownDan on November 27, 2015, 11:01:24 am
South Midtown sounds needy and desperate as if they need validation to live in South Tulsa. Either own where you live or move to midtown.

This.  If you want to separate old south Tulsa from the newest sprawl, it should be South Tulsa and Far South Tulsa.  That's how Dallas does it with the northern sprawl.  There is North Dallas (stuff north of LBJ) and Far North Dallas (stuff north of the 121 Turnpike).  That's a rough estimate from when I lived there.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: AquaMan on November 27, 2015, 12:53:22 pm
My neighborhood is called Southside. It includes Lee school at 21st and Cincinnati. It was developed around 1910. So am I living in old South Tulsa?


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: Conan71 on November 27, 2015, 06:37:57 pm
South Midtown sounds needy and desperate as if they need validation to live in South Tulsa. Either own where you live or move to midtown.

Big Jamoke-spewing laugh.  Thank you Carlton, I agree!


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: Breadburner on November 28, 2015, 10:47:35 am
I will allow a little East of Yale Between 15th and 51st.....


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: Tulsa Zephyr on November 28, 2015, 03:11:54 pm
On a similar note, I saw a Tulsa World article about an event which occurred at 71st and Peoria, which TW called "west Tulsa"...


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: Conan71 on November 28, 2015, 09:30:58 pm
On a similar note, I saw a Tulsa World article about an event which occurred at 71st and Peoria, which TW called "west Tulsa"...

It’s in Council District 2, might account for some of the confusion.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: BKDotCom on November 29, 2015, 10:58:04 pm
Tulsa's a big boring grid... let's just go with it.

I live in D-4 (think bingo or battleship)


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: cannon_fodder on November 30, 2015, 08:35:29 am
East of Yale is not  Midtown. Definitely not the portion south of 15th. South of 15th the houses are known for their mid-century modern styling, large single story floor plans, and were sold as "suburban style living" back in the day. It was constructed to be an alternative to midtown.

Even between Yale and Harvard, calling it midtown is a bit of a stretch. There are pockets that certainly are midtown (between I-244 and 15th, for example) but many areas that are not (between 36th and 41st). I live near 31st and Harvard, but comparing that "midtown" to Maple Ridge or 21st and Lewis...  I'd say the classic midtown ends at Harvard and ends at 41st as the southern most edge. "Expanded" midtown ends at Yale and ends at 51st. I refuse to call anything south of 51st midtown. East of Yale is very dubious, Sheridan gets ridiculous.

"South Midtown" to me means Brookside.  ;D


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: rebound on November 30, 2015, 10:04:21 am
East of Yale is not  Midtown. Definitely not the portion south of 15th. South of 15th the houses are known for their mid-century modern styling, large single story floor plans, and were sold as "suburban style living" back in the day. It was constructed to be an alternative to midtown.

Even between Yale and Harvard, calling it midtown is a bit of a stretch. There are pockets that certainly are midtown (between I-244 and 15th, for example) but many areas that are not (between 36th and 41st). I live near 31st and Harvard, but comparing that "midtown" to Maple Ridge or 21st and Lewis...  I'd say the classic midtown ends at Harvard and ends at 41st as the southern most edge. "Expanded" midtown ends at Yale and ends at 51st. I refuse to call anything south of 51st midtown. East of Yale is very dubious, Sheridan gets ridiculous.

"South Midtown" to me means Brookside.  ;D

Everything above, and particularly this: "I'd say the classic midtown ends at Harvard and ends at 41st as the southern most edge".

When we were looking at areas to move into last year, we looked hard at all the various areas. (and there are a lot of great ones, each with their own character)  But finally, we decided we wanted to live in "old midtown" (our name), which to us was inside the 41st and Harvard boundary.  While there are similar pockets outside these limits, this seems like the line where classic midtown ends.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: AquaMan on November 30, 2015, 11:02:32 am
I can't tell what makes you guys so sure of what and where the "real" midtown is but I will note that you are using period of time and architecture as the main criteria. That makes your designations arguable. You can find mixtures of style and age all over town in pockets as the city grew in spastic spurts.

When those areas around 41st & Harvard and 51st and Yale were developed they were considered east and south. In the late fifties, 51st and Yale was the edge of town and the only expressways available were I-44 and the "Bee-line". It took a lot of time to go from downtown to 51st and Harvard to visit Southern Hills. Now, you can get anywhere in town in about 15 minutes or less using one of the expressways surrounding the city, I-44, I-244, 51/64, 169, Creek and 75. The grid system for neighborhoods ended about the time Ranch Acres and Southern Hills began.

Its easier to determine "old Tulsa" by those two criteria. It seems to me, midtown is anything inside that circle of expressways. That area offers lots of different styles and ages.

It is what you want it to be I guess.



Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: carltonplace on November 30, 2015, 04:06:21 pm
I can't tell what makes you guys so sure of what and where the "real" midtown is but I will note that you are using period of time and architecture as the main criteria. That makes your designations arguable. You can find mixtures of style and age all over town in pockets as the city grew in spastic spurts.

When those areas around 41st & Harvard and 51st and Yale were developed they were considered east and south. In the late fifties, 51st and Yale was the edge of town and the only expressways available were I-44 and the "Bee-line". It took a lot of time to go from downtown to 51st and Harvard to visit Southern Hills. Now, you can get anywhere in town in about 15 minutes or less using one of the expressways surrounding the city, I-44, I-244, 51/64, 169, Creek and 75. The grid system for neighborhoods ended about the time Ranch Acres and Southern Hills began.

Its easier to determine "old Tulsa" by those two criteria. It seems to me, midtown is anything inside that circle of expressways. That area offers lots of different styles and ages.

It is what you want it to be I guess.



I'd agree with your boundaries (though I feel that 169 is east Tulsa), and I agree that the boundaries are somewhat fungible. But calling 81st St "South Midtown" is a reach. It's clearly an attempt to attach their part of town to an area that they perceive is somehow cooler then where they choose to live.
There's no need to borrow perceived hipness...assign a name to your area and then make it cool on its own merit. This is a very pretty part of town with its wide boulevards and mature trees and rolling hills and large homes on large lots.

Why not "Southtown" or "Eighty-above" or "Big@$$houseville".


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: TulsaGoldenHurriCAN on November 30, 2015, 04:42:29 pm
My neighborhood is called Southside. It includes Lee school at 21st and Cincinnati. It was developed around 1910. So am I living in old South Tulsa?

In terms of the pre-automobile (for the most part) and when Utica Square was considered a "suburban" shopping mall, yes that was old old South Tulsa. After the automobile became ubiquitous, the definition rightly changed as tulsa expanded.

For decades now, the definition of midtown refers to the older areas of Tulsa, as many on here mention, from Riverside to Yale and from I244 south to near 41st/51st.

Furthermore, there is a huge difference between the pre-40's and post-40's neighborhoods where development, architecture and walkability all took a nose-dive. I strongly prefer the pre-40's neighborhoods (Maple Ridge, Florence Park, Terwilliger, Swan Lake) as opposed to the later neighborhoods, mostly south and east, which really aren't well known by name for a reason.

Real estate prices in those old neighborhoods reflect the demand for the classic style and limited supply compared to neighborhoods around, say, 31st and Harvard or 41st and Yale. Anyone calling 61st "south midtown" knows about the prestige of midtown and the cost, but can't afford to live there. Probably young people who grew up in far south Tulsa who think they need 3000 square feet for 2 people.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: AquaMan on November 30, 2015, 05:59:07 pm
All the homes in this area had driveways and separate garages meant for model T's. I also see occasional concrete posts with eyehooks to tie up horses and wagons. My home has servants quarters too. Presumptuous for the size of the home but deemed necessary by the builder. Cars were pretty ubiquitous when most of the area was developed though. Owen Park, and near northside developments often had no driveways and were serviced by alleys.

It would be hard to not classify Ranch Acres or Bolewood as anything but midtown though. Even though it has no sidewalks, curvy roads and not pedestrian oriented at all. Still, a lovely midtown neighborhood.

I agree its silly to call areas south of I-44 "south- midtown" but that's likely originated and driven by Realtors hoping to cash in on perceived trends, not homeowners. Anything east of Memorial is still east Tulsa to me. But I understand its a relative thing. To those living at 81st and Harvard who have visited gated communities at 101st and Yale, it seems more "south midtown" than south. To those who have looked at Wagoner county, 129th seems midtown. That's why I prefer to use development names or nearby landmarks. Shadow Mountain, Silver Chase, Woodland Hills, etc.

Inside the expressways almost works. 169 is too far east. Between the river and 75 is obviously West Tulsa. But its close.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: Conan71 on November 30, 2015, 10:11:11 pm
Lowe’s calls their store at 15th & Yale their “Midtown” Location.  I always considered my Lortondale house at 27th & Yale as midtown and have thought of my home in Wedgwood as the same.  I suppose my current house is in one of those transitional areas where midtown starts to become east Tulsa, though when I think of east Tulsa I think of parts east of Sheridan.  I’ve heard the Farm Shopping center described as midtown before.

“Midtown” seems to be one of those terms that is in the the lexicon of the beholder.  :-*


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: SXSW on November 30, 2015, 11:01:08 pm
Midtown = (N) Downtown/I-244, (S) I-44, (E) Sheridan, (W) the Arkansas River

Honestly the best name for south Tulsa between I-44 and the Creek is Uptown.  Downtown > Midtown > Uptown 
It even reflects the topography of that area.  :P

Growing up we called the area south of the Creek "Deep South Tulsa"


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: Tulsasaurus Rex on December 01, 2015, 04:43:22 am
Uptown is the area between SoBo (18th & Boston) and the IDL.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: TulsaGoldenHurriCAN on December 01, 2015, 10:21:16 am
Cars were pretty ubiquitous when most of the area was developed though.

Not compared to post-WWII. In the early 20's (When most of the original midtown neighborhoods were developed), there were 86 vehicles per 1,000 population and most families did not own one and that shaped the concentration of those early development drastically (lot size, road shape, side walks, etc).

After the 40s, most families owned a car and there were 600+ vehicles per 1,000 population. Suddenly lot sizes increased, roads got wider, side walks were not standard and developments sprawled. Now there are over 800 cars per 1,000 population.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_vehicle#United_States (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_vehicle#United_States)


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: carltonplace on December 01, 2015, 10:30:57 am
Uptown is the area between SoBo (18th & Boston) and the IDL.

^^ Truth.
U
P
TULSA
O
W
N


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: TulsaGoldenHurriCAN on December 01, 2015, 10:34:24 am
Midtown = (N) Downtown/I-244, (S) I-44, (E) Sheridan, (W) the Arkansas River

Honestly the best name for south Tulsa between I-44 and the Creek is Uptown.  Downtown > Midtown > Uptown 
It even reflects the topography of that area.  :P

Growing up we called the area south of the Creek "Deep South Tulsa"


No, uptown is the area south of downtown, around Utica square/Riverside between ~15th and 31st. In almost every city, uptown refers to the same type of area near downtown.

There is already a name for between I-44 and the Creek: South Tulsa. South of there could become deep south Tulsa or far South Tulsa, but you can't just change an unofficial name that was given by the citizens and has been there for decades.

It would be like North Tulsa deciding, "we don't like that name! We are going to start calling it South Owasso or Upper Downtown!" It just wouldn't work.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: Tulsasaurus Rex on December 01, 2015, 02:52:56 pm
You can't just change an unofficial name that was given by the citizens and has been there for decades.

It would be like North Tulsa deciding, "we don't like that name! We are going to start calling it South Owasso or Upper Downtown!" It just wouldn't work.

It happens all the time. Didn't they do that with the Rose District in Broken Arrow? NoMa (North of Massachusetts Avenue) in DC was invented out of whole cloth a few years ago and now everyone uses it. Sometimes it's realtors, sometimes it's business improvement districts, sometimes it's the internet. But it happens and sometimes they stick.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: TulsaGoldenHurriCAN on December 01, 2015, 03:31:01 pm
It happens all the time. Didn't they do that with the Rose District in Broken Arrow? NoMa (North of Massachusetts Avenue) in DC was invented out of whole cloth a few years ago and now everyone uses it. Sometimes it's realtors, sometimes it's business improvement districts, sometimes it's the internet. But it happens and sometimes they stick.

I said that in reference to an area the size of south Tulsa from I44 to creek turnpike which makes up a huge portion of Tulsa. There is not enough solidarity in that large of an area to do something like that. That's why I used north Tulsa as an example: People won't suddenly start calling it Upper Downtown or Upper Midtown just because a few people would prefer that.

Plus I said "you can't just change an unofficial name that was given by the citizens and has been there for decades". Those examples you listed are giving new names to unnamed places. If anything, parts of south Tulsa should do that if they have enough of a uniqueness to warrant it, not reuse labels from existing areas in town.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: Tulsasaurus Rex on December 01, 2015, 03:52:18 pm
Those examples you listed are giving new names to unnamed places. If anything, parts of south Tulsa should do that if they have enough of a uniqueness to warrant it, not reuse labels from existing areas in town.

You're right about the size and lack of cohesion, you're right that many parts of South Tulsa should come up with some marketing names. But not every place that gets a new name was previously unnamed. NoMa was Swampoodle until a few years ago.  I can see why they changed it...


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: charky on December 01, 2015, 04:49:23 pm
I tell people that I live in Lower Midtown,  51st and Yale is the closest major intersection. They all just laugh. 

Ha ha...I like that and will use it. My nearly 60 year old Holiday Hills home certainly doesn't feel south Tulsa


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: saintnicster on December 02, 2015, 10:16:14 am
I said that in reference to an area the size of south Tulsa from I44 to creek turnpike which makes up a huge portion of Tulsa. There is not enough solidarity in that large of an area to do something like that. That's why I used north Tulsa as an example: People won't suddenly start calling it Upper Downtown or Upper Midtown just because a few people would prefer that.

Plus I said "you can't just change an unofficial name that was given by the citizens and has been there for decades". Those examples you listed are giving new names to unnamed places. If anything, parts of south Tulsa should do that if they have enough of a uniqueness to warrant it, not reuse labels from existing areas in town.
Stop trying to make Fetch happen.  It's not going to happen!


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: Townsend on December 02, 2015, 12:51:01 pm
Stop trying to make Fetch happen.  It's not going to happen!

Boo you whore...I used that line just the other day.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: Townsend on December 03, 2015, 12:41:30 pm
I refer to Far South Tulsa as District 8. 

While apparently not the most attractive of the districts in Panem, Tulsa's 8 has the longest life expectancy.

"Don't hate the 8"

Anyway...Go 8!

(http://mediad.publicbroadcasting.net/p/kwgs/files/styles/x_large/public/201512/close_health_gaps_map.jpg)


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: Townsend on December 03, 2015, 12:46:31 pm
On that same note, "South Midtown" could be referred to as "the 9th", or Nines, Niner, D9, the Dry Ninth ward...

http://maps.cityoftulsa.org/citycouncil/ (http://maps.cityoftulsa.org/citycouncil/)



Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: PonderInc on December 03, 2015, 01:31:48 pm
I consider myself a midtown/downtown person who currently lives in the far southeast burbs at 41st and Harvard.

(I suppose this is a bit like being a trans person who's trapped in the wrong body....)

Back when I was a "real" midtown person, the only reason I traveled this far south was to visit my folks and to eat at India Palace, which is so good I overlook the fact that you need a visa and passport to go there.

Years ago, people used to talk about how the fairgrounds was the geographic center of Tulsa.  Even though it was in the middle, it was never considered the epicenter of "midtown."

I think of "midtown" as near downtown to the south and east, and I do factor in architecture and the existence of an actual street grid (or something that could pass as a street grid, at least).  My definition is more art than science, it makes no sense, and it has a bias that excludes north and west of downtown.  Hmmm...


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: patric on December 03, 2015, 01:53:02 pm
On that same note, "South Midtown" could be referred to as "the 9th", or Nines, Niner, D9, the Dry Ninth ward...

http://maps.cityoftulsa.org/citycouncil/ (http://maps.cityoftulsa.org/citycouncil/)


...except for those who were in the 9th district one day and woke up in the 4th district the next.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: Townsend on December 03, 2015, 02:57:10 pm

(I suppose this is a bit like being a trans person who's trapped in the wrong body....)


Conan?


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: TulsaGoldenHurriCAN on December 03, 2015, 03:04:12 pm
White City??!!

That’s just racist!

Before I found out the origins, I thought the same thing. It was named after the White City dairy farm which was there before they closed it and sold the land to develop. The name was referring to the color of all the buildings and silos. It was founded by the same guy who founded ONEOK.

http://www.tulsagal.net/2010/11/historic-neighborhoods-white-city.html (http://www.tulsagal.net/2010/11/historic-neighborhoods-white-city.html)


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: Conan71 on December 04, 2015, 08:35:05 am
Conan?

(https://images.rapgenius.com/eaf5e81cfeebc6e734a11fb0b5aefc5b.620x930x1.jpg)


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: SXSW on December 04, 2015, 10:34:34 am
Uptown is the area between SoBo (18th & Boston) and the IDL.

Which doesn't make sense.  Why would uptown be between downtown and midtown?  That neighborhood is Riverview with just the part along Boston considered by some as Sobo/South Boston.

I'm not advocating changing south Tulsa's name just stating what would make the most sense if applying NYC logic to downtown-midtown-uptown naming conventions.  OKC has fairly recently renamed the area directly north of its downtown to midtown roughly around 13th St (which is a much smaller area than midtown in Tulsa) and then the commercial corridor along 23rd is uptown.  That make sense if not slightly contrived.  But uptown in Riverview is dumb.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: SXSW on December 04, 2015, 10:39:18 am
Back when I was a "real" midtown person, the only reason I traveled this far south was to visit my folks and to eat at India Palace, which is so good I overlook the fact that you need a visa and passport to go there.

Ha I'm the same way.  Why doesn't midtown have any good Indian food?  I also like Ri Le (wish they still had their Harvard location) and White Lion Pub.  And an occasional visit to Super Target on 71st.  Otherwise I rarely cross I-44.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: Townsend on December 04, 2015, 12:50:59 pm
Which doesn't make sense.  Why would uptown be between downtown and midtown?  That neighborhood is Riverview with just the part along Boston considered by some as Sobo/South Boston.

I'm not advocating changing south Tulsa's name just stating what would make the most sense if applying NYC logic to downtown-midtown-uptown naming conventions.  OKC has fairly recently renamed the area directly north of its downtown to midtown roughly around 13th St (which is a much smaller area than midtown in Tulsa) and then the commercial corridor along 23rd is uptown.  That make sense if not slightly contrived.  But uptown in Riverview is dumb.

Any area is named whatever enough people are willing to call it.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: brettakins on December 10, 2015, 07:24:23 am
(http://i1265.photobucket.com/albums/jj517/Brettakins/Tulsa%20Neighborhood_zpse6lgxfn6.png?t=1449667432)


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: Tulsasaurus Rex on December 10, 2015, 12:18:44 pm
West of Downtown is real, East of Downtown isn't. Even if that exists immediately outside the IDL, no one would describe locations all the way out to Memorial by the fact they are east of Downtown. Most of that area is Midtown.

Otherwise, pretty good map. I might fidget with the area where Midtown, South Tulsa, and East Tulsa converge, but that's marginal.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: SXSW on December 13, 2015, 03:38:40 pm
Did you create that map?  Please send to the Tulsa World.  But I agree "east of downtown" doesn't make sense.  You could possibly extend downtown's eastern boundary to Peoria but keeping it confined to the IDL seems to be pretty standard.  And just lump the area west of downtown with northwest.

Memorial is a good dividing line between midtown and east IMO, though some will disagree.  The line between east and south at 51st also makes sense since areas south of there adjacent to BA east of 169 are more south Tulsa than east.

One area that could be broken up is West Tulsa.  There is a pretty distinctive difference between the Tulsa Hills area and old Red Fork and 41st & Union.  This didn't exist 10 years ago but does now and will continue.  I would call everything south of I-44 Southwest Tulsa and keep the rest West Tulsa.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: AquaMan on December 13, 2015, 04:05:15 pm
I would agree with that except the area west of downtown does seem to make sense. I drive the two areas regularly and though they were once a contiguous neighborhood they are now separated by the expressway. Since that separation they have evolved differently.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: patric on December 13, 2015, 04:56:52 pm
Always thought of Sheridan as an east-west divider, but its probably more of a jagged edge.

Looks like Tulsa World art.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: DowntownDan on December 14, 2015, 10:26:04 am
I think the highways are a natural divides so I think the map is about accurate, except that the "east of downtown" doesn't make much sense to me.  I understand that there are some areas just outside the IDL that feel more like downtown than midtown, but gray areas around the boundaries are inevitable and were not talking real borders here.  And there's no way it extends to Memorial.  To me everything south of 244 and between the IDL and Memorial is midtown.


Title: Re: South Midtown?
Post by: joiei on December 14, 2015, 10:36:28 am
w.imdb.com/title/tt0089360/?ref_=vi_tt_t_tt_ov_vi]w[url]w.imdb.com/title/tt0089360/?ref_=vi_tt_t_tt_ov_vi (http://w[url)[/url]