News:

Long overdue maintenance happening. See post in the top forum.

Main Menu

Sex offender status

Started by NellieBly, February 26, 2007, 12:13:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Chicken Little

#1
February 26, 2007, 01:54:23 PM
Lucky is right about this one.  Public urination needs to be separated from the real sex crimes.  We need to worry about high-risk offenders.

sgrizzle

#2
February 26, 2007, 01:56:49 PM
Agreed.

jamesrage

#3
March 01, 2007, 02:39:38 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Chicken Little

Lucky is right about this one.  Public urination needs to be separated from the real sex crimes.  We need to worry about high-risk offenders.




What do you define as high risk?I define rapist,child molesters/rapist, those who attempt sex to have sex with children as high risk and those who seek to sexual harm children in any other way as high risk.
___________________________________________________________________________
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those

Chicken Little

#4
March 01, 2007, 10:50:53 PM
quote:
Originally posted by jamesrage

quote:
Originally posted by Chicken Little

Lucky is right about this one.  Public urination needs to be separated from the real sex crimes.  We need to worry about high-risk offenders.




What do you define as high risk?I define rapist,child molesters/rapist, those who attempt sex to have sex with children as high risk and those who seek to sexual harm children in any other way as high risk.
A drunk who gets caught peeing on a bush can be placed on the sex offender list.  Keeping track of these guys steals resources that should be dedicated to tracking high-risk offenders.  This is a stupid rule that needs to change.

My definition of "high-risk" is the same as yours, and Lucky's for that matter.
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions