News:

Long overdue maintenance happening. See post in the top forum.

Main Menu

Why I will never shop at a Home Depot again.

Started by jamesrage, June 08, 2007, 12:39:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

jamesrage

I would think something like this would have only happened in a really liberal place.I do not think stopping shoplifters should be a firing offense at any place.I guess I will only shop at other hardware and home improvement stores from now on.

http://www.koco.com/news/13441545/detail.html
Man Says Home Depot Fired Workers For Catching Thieves

MIDWEST CITY, Okla. -- A former Home Depot employee said the company fired him and three other workers because they helped police catch several suspected shoplifters in May.

Midwest City police said the men helped officers catch suspected shoplifters as they tried to run from a store with lawn equipment.

An internal memo from Home Depot outlines that associates cannot accuse, detain, chase or call the police on any customer for shoplifting. However, one of the fired employees said the company is selective in enforcing that policy.

___________________________________________________________________________
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those

cannon_fodder

I saw that.  Most stores have loss policies that are a joke.  Employees know many of the shoplifters by name (if not their real name, they at least have nicknames for them and recognize them).  They know who they are, they know what they are doing, and they know how they are doing it.  Yet they are not allowed to stop them.

This problem grows when a store has two or more locations in a metro.  Steal from one and return at the other store.  Get a gift card if you must - and then ebay the gift card for near face value.

Store employees have a shopkeepers privilege to detain someone they suspect of theft for a reasonable period of time.  In a mall or at a home depot it would not take long for security to come and help out and quickly get the police involved.  Instead, they let jackasses steal and make up the loss by charging the rest of us more.
- - - - - - - - -
I crush grooves.

tim huntzinger

THE Home Depot, y'mean.  Well, THE Home Depot has rules, and if employees break the rules . . . But why the rule to begin with? Because some vicious SOB is bound to choke a shoplifter to death and place the Co. in far worse financial condition than if'n the cracklehead and been able to git away.

Conan71

Tim, I think that's exactly the point.  They'd rather take the merchandise loss instead of an employee being hurt, or a shoplifter suing them for being beat-up by an employee jacked-up on adrenaline.

Anyone remember the young store clerk shot and killed at the Albertson's at 41st & Peoria when he chased a guy out who'd pinched a 12 pack of beer?  When was that, about 5-7 years ago?  His life was worth more than $8 worth of beer.
"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan

bugo

quote:
Originally posted by Conan71

Anyone remember the young store clerk shot and killed at the Albertson's at 41st & Peoria when he chased a guy out who'd pinched a 12 pack of beer?  When was that, about 5-7 years ago?  His life was worth more than $8 worth of beer.



Someone stole a 12 pack of 3.2 beer?  That is sad.

Ibanez

quote:
Originally posted by Conan71

Tim, I think that's exactly the point.  They'd rather take the merchandise loss instead of an employee being hurt, or a shoplifter suing them for being beat-up by an employee jacked-up on adrenaline.

Anyone remember the young store clerk shot and killed at the Albertson's at 41st & Peoria when he chased a guy out who'd pinched a 12 pack of beer?  When was that, about 5-7 years ago?  His life was worth more than $8 worth of beer.



Not really. A thief is a thief is a thief no matter the amount of $ or merchandise they steal. To me the life of a thief is worthless.

Conan71

quote:
Originally posted by wavoka

quote:
Originally posted by Conan71

Tim, I think that's exactly the point.  They'd rather take the merchandise loss instead of an employee being hurt, or a shoplifter suing them for being beat-up by an employee jacked-up on adrenaline.

Anyone remember the young store clerk shot and killed at the Albertson's at 41st & Peoria when he chased a guy out who'd pinched a 12 pack of beer?  When was that, about 5-7 years ago?  His life was worth more than $8 worth of beer.



Not really. A thief is a thief is a thief no matter the amount of $ or merchandise they steal. To me the life of a thief is worthless.



Unfortunately, it wasn't the thief that was killed, it was the clerk.
"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan

cannon_fodder

You're right Tim, that is why the policy is in place.  I suppose the company made the financial decision to avoid the situation you described.  I do not know what policy could avoid the danger, but its too bad we have to pay for the crimes committed by there idiots.

The more widespread this knowledge becomes, the more the problem will grow.  Without fear of getting caught can you imagine? [:(!]
- - - - - - - - -
I crush grooves.

jamesrage

quote:
Originally posted by Conan71

Tim, I think that's exactly the point.  They'd rather take the merchandise loss instead of an employee being hurt, or a shoplifter suing them for being beat-up by an employee jacked-up on adrenaline.

Anyone remember the young store clerk shot and killed at the Albertson's at 41st & Peoria when he chased a guy out who'd pinched a 12 pack of beer?  When was that, about 5-7 years ago?  His life was worth more than $8 worth of beer.



One could argue that it is a safety issue and lawsuit issue but, how do they explain the employees can not accuse shoplifters of stealing nor can they call the cops on shoplifters?

___________________________________________________________________________
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those

sgrizzle

You can't accuse them of shoplifting for the lawsuit angle as well. Calling the police on someone is the same as accusing them.

It's better to let people run off with stuff than to face a lawsuit.

MichaelC

Only really big companies can get away with that.  Try stealing something from Midtown Hardware, see if they let you run away with it.  It's not just a lawsuit issue, it's also a publicity issue.  

On the other hand, Walmart wants it's employees to kill shoplifters.  Might say something about the clientel.  Go figure.

Conan71

quote:
Originally posted by MichaelC

Only really big companies can get away with that.  Try stealing something from Midtown Hardware, see if they let you run away with it.  It's not just a lawsuit issue, it's also a publicity issue.  

On the other hand, Walmart wants it's employees to kill shoplifters.  Might say something about the clientel.  Go figure.



Trying to say you might get a free demo of a sledge hammer if you try to rip-off Midtown?
"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan