News:

Long overdue maintenance happening. See post in the top forum.

Main Menu

McCain v. Hillary and McCain v. Obama

Started by RecycleMichael, March 27, 2008, 11:17:39 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

RecycleMichael

You mean NationalJournal.com?

The same group that has a story on their website titled Obama's "hope bong" is packed with change...

Real fair and balanced coverage there.

I posted the ratings of eight of the most conservative groups in Washington and you post an online newspaper writing stories worthy of the Weekly World News?  

They might as well say Obama is Bat Boy.
Power is nothing till you use it.

iplaw

quote:
Originally posted by RecycleMichael

You mean NationalJournal.com?

The same group that has a story on their website titled Obama's "hope bong" is packed with change...

Real fair and balanced coverage there.

I posted the ratings of eight of the most conservative groups in Washington and you post an online newspaper writing stories worthy of the Weekly World News?  

They might as well say Obama is Bat Boy.

I think you're confused.  There aren't any stories with that headline anywhere on the website, not even in the archives.

I think you're probably mis-remembering where you read that.  The "hope bong" was a Colbert creation.

National journal has been the standard for non-partisan political rankings for well over 30 years.  To rank them among the likes of "WWN" shows you're completely unfamiliar with them.

shadows

McCain/Rice? V Hillary/? Or McCain/Rice? V Obama/?  They have not removed the tarps off the big guns yet.  

Predict that the republican party will remain in control of the White House after the smoke from the big guns clear.  
Today we stand in ecstasy and view that we build today'
Tomorrow we will enter into the plea to have it torn away.

FOTD

Rice won't cut it. She's an utter failure. Many died on her watch. The country went broke.

I hope they do put her on the ticket.
She'd just further facilitate the neccesary defeat and makeover of our current government....I can see her in a debate now, "I can't answer that for National Security reasons."