City TIA investigation - GP shareholders revealed

[sendoff]

Phase 1:

http://www.tulsacouncil.org/AirportInvestigation.htm
http://www.tulsacouncil.org/airport.pdf

Large Great Plains Common Stock Shareholders
Berlin, Steven - 890,478 shares
Johnson, David A. - 940,478 shares
Knight, John H. - 1,310,000 shares
McCorkell, Donald L. - 915,478 shares
Swartz Ashland L.P. - 1,070,000 shares
Turnbo, Steven W. - 491,703 shares

Large Great Plains Preferred Stock Shareholders
World Publishing Company - 233,333 shares

The Tulsa World holds over 52% of the preferred stock and was the largest single investor in actual dollars (51.1%).

[Preferred Stock: Capital stock having priority over a corporation's common stock in the distribution of dividends and often of assets.]

[I should note that the largest single investor was not a shareholder: the great citizens of the State of Oklahoma. $20M in tax credits.]

[MDepr2007]

Why do replies vanish?

I see MichaelC is the name as the last post but it's not here?

http://www.tulsanow.net/forum/search.asp?mode=DoIt&MEMBER_ID=439

ok I just covered it but look at the other post with no replies but has a different name as last reply then the one who started it.
Don't get pissy to me for asking and why reply if no answer to give[]

[tim huntzinger]

By the Almighty, you must be a Tulsan!  Who cares? All this is water under the bridge, forgive and forget, let it GO, man!  What kind of freak goes digging up a post from years ago to check out the accuracy?  Tin foil hat alert! Those kinds of shennanigans will NEVER EVER be repeated EVER AGAIN.  Tulsans learned from all that and could NEVER be tricked by the daily newspaper and a cabal of jerk-offs like the assembled list ever again.  Only idiot Tulsans care about stupid crap, like the past, or the truth, or holding white-collar criminals (IMHO) accountable, or those who manipulate the public trust.  Sheesh.

[swake]

quote:Originally posted by MDepr2007

Why do replies vanish?

I see MichaelC is the name as the last post but it's not here?

http://www.tulsanow.net/forum/search.asp?mode=DoIt&MEMBER_ID=439

ok I just covered it but look at the other post with no replies but has a different name as last reply then the one who started it.
Don't get pissy to me for asking and why reply if no answer to give[]

It's because the thread you revived is four years old. It seems that original posts starting threads hang around longer than the replies. Nothing sinister, you've just jumped in years after the discussion on this ended.