News:

Long overdue maintenance happening. See post in the top forum.

Main Menu

Actual Federal IncomeTax Rates History

Started by RecycleMichael, September 19, 2011, 02:14:14 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

RecycleMichael

http://www.taxfoundation.org/files/fed_individual_rate_history-june2010.pdf

2010 top rate (over $373,650 for married filing jointly) 35%

2009 top rate (over $372,950 and start of Obama Presidency 35%
2001 top rate (over $297,350 and start of Bush Presidency) 39.6%
1993 top rate (over $250,000 and start of Clinton Presidency 39.6%
1989 top rate (over $155,320 and start of Bush Presidency 28%
1981 top rate (over $215,400 and start of Reagan Presidency 70%
1977 top rate (over $203,200 and start of Carter Presidency 70%
1964 to 1976 top rate (over $200,000) 70%
1954 to 1963 top rate (over $400,000) 91%

The economy was chugging along fine during the 50s, 60s, and 70s with income tax rates on the wealthy very high. Please make the argument that a less than a four percent tax hike on the top tax bracket is going to ruin the economy.
Power is nothing till you use it.

Conan71

Quote from: RecycleMichael on September 19, 2011, 02:14:14 PM
http://www.taxfoundation.org/files/fed_individual_rate_history-june2010.pdf

2010 top rate (over $373,650 for married filing jointly) 35%

2009 top rate (over $372,950 and start of Obama Presidency 35%
2001 top rate (over $297,350 and start of Bush Presidency) 39.6%
1993 top rate (over $250,000 and start of Clinton Presidency 39.6%
1989 top rate (over $155,320 and start of Bush Presidency 28%
1981 top rate (over $215,400 and start of Reagan Presidency 70%
1977 top rate (over $203,200 and start of Carter Presidency 70%
1964 to 1976 top rate (over $200,000) 70%
1954 to 1963 top rate (over $400,000) 91%

The economy was chugging along fine during the 50s, 60s, and 70s with income tax rates on the wealthy very high. Please make the argument that a less than a four percent tax hike on the top tax bracket is going to ruin the economy.

It's already ruined.  There.
"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan

heironymouspasparagus

They can't because it won't.  It will actually help a lot because the people who are looking at our fiscal crap will be reassured and the economy will stabilize and do well.  The problem with that is it is directly opposite what the 1%ers want.  They will never be hurt by anything the economy does anyway, so mostly don't really care about dislocation for the rest of us.  What is critical is to put the squeeze on the 99% so they will vote for the next tea bagger they want to put up in front of you.  So they can get more tax cuts, preferential treatment, etc.



"So he brandished a gun, never shot anyone or anything right?"  --TeeDub, 17 Feb 2018.

I don't share my thoughts because I think it will change the minds of people who think differently.  I share my thoughts to show the people who already think like me that they are not alone.

Ed W

Michael, it's well established that reality has a liberal bias.  Besides, whatever facts are presented and however interesting they may be, those facts are irrelevant.
Ed

May you live in interesting times.