Bipartisan Group Heads to OU!

[FOTD]

Will this change the face of American politics or end up being just another think tanker?

Bipartisan Group Eyes Independent Bid
First, Main Candidates Urged To Plan 'Unity' Government

By David S. Broder
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, December 30, 2007; Page A04
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/29/AR2007122901476.html?hpid=topnews
New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, a potential independent candidate for president, has scheduled a meeting next week with a dozen leading Democrats and Republicans, who will join him in challenging the major-party contenders to spell out their plans for forming a "government of national unity" to end the gridlock in Washington.

Those who will be at the Jan. 7 session at the University of Oklahoma say that if the likely nominees of the two parties do not pledge to "go beyond tokenism" in building an administration that seeks national consensus, they will be prepared to back Bloomberg or someone else in a third-party campaign for president.

Conveners of the meeting include such prominent Democrats as former senators Sam Nunn (Ga.), Charles S. Robb (Va.) and David L. Boren (Okla.), and former presidential candidate Gary Hart. Republican organizers include Sen. Chuck Hagel (Neb.), former party chairman Bill Brock, former senator John Danforth (Mo.) and former New Jersey governor Christine Todd Whitman.

Boren, who will host the meeting at the university, where he is president, said: "It is not a gathering to urge any one person to run for president or to say there necessarily ought to be an independent option. But if we don't see a refocusing of the campaign on a bipartisan approach, I would feel I would want to encourage an independent candidacy."

The list of acceptances suggests that the group could muster the financial and political firepower to make the threat of such a candidacy real. Others who have indicated that they plan to attend the one-day session include William S. Cohen, a former Republican senator from Maine and defense secretary in the Clinton administration; Alan Dixon, a former Democratic senator from Illinois; Bob Graham, a former Democratic senator from Florida; Jim Leach, a former Republican congressman from Iowa; Susan Eisenhower, a political consultant and granddaughter of former president Dwight D. Eisenhower; David Abshire, president of the Center for the Study of the Presidency; and Edward Perkins, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.

Bloomberg, a former Democrat who was elected mayor of New York as a Republican, left the GOP this past summer to become an independent. While disclaiming any plan to run for president in 2008, he has continued to fuel speculation by traveling widely and speaking out on both domestic and international issues. The mayor, a billionaire many times over, presumably could self-finance even a late-starting candidacy.

"As mayor, he has seen far too often how hyperpartisanship in Washington has gotten in the way of making progress on a host of issues," said Bloomberg's press secretary, Stu Loeser. "He looks forward to sitting down and discussing this with other leaders."

Until plans for this meeting were disclosed, the most concrete public move toward any kind of independent candidacy was by Unity08, a group planning an online nominating convention to pick either an independent candidate or a ticket combining a Republican and a Democrat. The sponsors, an eclectic mix of consultants who have worked for candidates including Jimmy Carter (D) and Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), have not aligned with a specific prospect.

Now, some people with high-level political and governmental credentials are moving to put muscle behind the effort. A letter from Nunn and Boren sent to those attending the Jan. 7 session said that "our political system is, at the least, badly bent and many are concluding that it is broken at a time where America must lead boldly at home and abroad. Partisan polarization is preventing us from uniting to meet the challenges that we must face if we are to prevent further erosion in America's power of leadership and example."

At the session, Boren said, participants will try to draft a statement on such issues as the need to "rebuild and reconfigure our military forces," nuclear proliferation and terrorism, and restoring U.S. credibility in the world.

"Today, we are a house divided," the letter said. "We believe that the next president must be able to call for a unity of effort by choosing the best talent available -- without regard to political party -- to help lead our nation."

Boren said he and Nunn, who often collaborated when they headed the Senate Intelligence and Armed Services committees, respectively, issued invitations to other moderates with whom they had served, and found that almost everyone was willing to come.

"Our hope is that the candidates will respond with their own specific ideas about how to pull the country together, not just aim at getting out their own polarized base," Boren said. "But we will have a couple months before the nominees will be known, and we can judge in that time what their response will be."

Boren said the meeting is being announced in advance of Thursday's Iowa caucuses "because we don't want anyone to think this was a response to any particular candidate or candidates." He said the nation needs a "government of national unity" to overcome its partisan divisions in a time of national challenge he likened to that faced by Great Britain during World War II.

"Electing a president based solely on the platform or promises of one party is not adequate for this time," Boren said. "Until you end the polarization and have bipartisanship, nothing else matters, because one party simply will block the other from acting."

Danforth said he remains a Republican but finds little cause for optimism among the current GOP candidates. "My party is appealing to a real meanness," he said in an interview, "and an irresponsible sense of machismo in foreign policy. I hope it will be less extreme, but I'm an American before I'm a Republican." Danforth has also written critically about the impact of religious conservatives on the Republican Party.

Cohen said his emphasis will be on the issues rather than on a candidacy, adding that he and Nunn will co-sponsor a series of "dialogues" on key topics, aiming to build planks for a possible consensus platform for the next president.

"The important goal all of us share," Cohen said, "is to get government back to the center."

Nunn, for his part, described Bloomberg as "an enormously capable man" but said: "I've made no decision who I'm going to support. Most of us hope to shape the Republican or Democratic side's response, but who knows where this is going to go? I think the country's at the tipping point, and it's going to take a lot more understanding by the electorate for anybody to be able to lead."

[FOTD]

Will IOWA become meaningless? In Iowa, the first choice maybe the candidate who persuades the most people to make him or HER their second Choice.

Living-room deals may decide winner
LYNN SWEET | Democratic candidates could strike agreements with rivals to support each other for second-choice balloting Thursday

January 1, 2008
BY LYNN SWEET Sun-Times Columnist
DES MOINES, Iowa -- After almost a year of manic focus on Democrats John Edwards, Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton, the Iowa caucus outcome Thursday may depend on the front-runners' allies cutting deals with the backers of Joe Biden, Chris Dodd, Bill Richardson and Dennis Kucinich.

That's because in many precincts, it will take two rounds of voting to determine how many delegates each contender will earn.

The front-runners, in the closing days of the campaign, are pleading not only to be the first pick of voters -- but also to be the second choice if a person's favorite is knocked out in the first round.

Obama on the stump has been quite explicit lately: ''If you're already committed to someone else, please make me your second choice."

Biden may be the main beneficiary of this convoluted two-bites-at-the-apple system, where personal and political relationships of the people at a neighborhood caucus come into play, as well as the skill of a precinct captain working back channels.

Another factor is this: Die-hard Clinton, Obama and Edwards backers would rather back second-tier contenders in second-round voting than each other.

"We know we will have three candidates who will not help each other," said Biden spokesman Larry Rasky on Monday, referring to the front-runners. " . . . They are competing for first."

Biden may even come in fourth -- which for him would be a tremendous victory and be his ticket to admission to the New Hampshire Democratic debate on Saturday, limited to leading contenders.

"There is a lot of fluidity in this race right now," said David Plouffe, Obama's campaign manager, on Monday morning.

"A lot of undecideds, a lot of people looking for a second-choice candidate," Plouffe said.

Since electability looms as a big factor in both voting rounds, Plouffe and the campaigns of Edwards, Biden and Richardson all issued memos about their general election potential on Monday.

A quick primer on the Iowa Democratic caucus (the Republicans just have a straight vote):

There is no secret ballot box in a caucus, no absentee voting. Everything is done out in the open, so people will know who is for whom.

There are 1,781 precinct caucuses called to order at 6:30 p.m. Thursday. While there will be some exceptions in the smaller precincts, a "viability threshold" will have to first be determined by people physically moving around to stand in sections of a room for their candidate.

If a candidate fails to meet a threshold -- in most cases 15 percent -- they are considered non-viable

After 30 minutes or so of wheeling and dealing, there is a re-alignment with several strategic options. Using Biden as an example, it could unfold this way:

• • Biden is found non-viable in a precinct and supporters re-align to help a front-runner

• • A front-runner, in return, in another precinct, would send surplus backers over to Biden to make him viable and eligible to pick up a delegate. Better Biden than someone else.

• • Non-viables can join with non-viables. Biden and Dodd backers, for example, could make a deal to help each other.

blogs.suntimes.com/sweet
http://www.suntimes.com/news/sweet/721463,CST-NWS-sweet01.article

Bring on the aristocrat party!?