Obama's October Surprise

[Friendly Bear]

Word is the Obama's October Surprise against the McCain-Palin ticket will be huge sympathy vote for the late President Jimmy Carter.

His Cook County Democrat Political Machine has decided that the popular (with Democrats) former President will be euthanized on October 29.  

Rosalyn hasn't been informed, yet.

Barack has a great sermon already written for the Presidential Eulogy.

They will forget to invite Senator McCain.

Sorry, bureaucratic snafu.

R.I.P.

[xx(]

[Cubs]

Well, not that I believe it, but it wouldn't work. Carter was one of the worst Presidents ever.

[Friendly Bear]

quote:Originally posted by Cubs

Well, not that I believe it, but it wouldn't work. Carter was one of the worst Presidents ever.

Okay.  

They move to Plan B:

They euthanize HILLARY Oct. 29.

That brings out her voters to cast a Remembrance Vote in her memory.  

For Obama.

Bill will find a new legion of grieving bimbos to comfort him.

What you call a Win-Win.

[]

[Gaspar]

quote:Originally posted by Cubs

Well, not that I believe it, but it wouldn't work. Carter was one of the worst Presidents ever.

No, he actually was THE worst ever, but he did teach us a lot about economics by demonstrating what happens when you raise taxes on small businesses.

He also taught us a great deal about energy independence.  We are still paying for his policies today.

He is on a pedestal that I don't think anyone can touch for a while unless we choose someone who wants to follow the same "just wear a sweater", or "just air up your tires" policies.

But we're not that stupid.

[Friendly Bear]

quote:Originally posted by Gaspar

quote:Originally posted by Cubs

Well, not that I believe it, but it wouldn't work. Carter was one of the worst Presidents ever.

No, he actually was THE worst ever, but he did teach us a lot about economics by demonstrating what happens when you raise taxes on small businesses.

He also taught us a great deal about energy independence.  We are still paying for his policies today.

He is on a pedestal that I don't think anyone can touch for a while unless we choose someone who wants to follow the same "just wear a sweater", or "just air up your tires" policies.

But we're not that stupid.

A significant percentage of the voters don't even remember the Carter Administration. They were born or became adults on or after 1980.  

[Teatownclown]

Republicans bracing for 'October surprise' as Gloria Allred 'prepares for Romney revelation'

By Daily Mail Reporter
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2220526/Republicans-bracing-October-surprise-Gloria-Allred-prepares-Romney-revelation.html
Republicans are bracing themselves for Gloria Allred to make a potentially damaging revelation about Mitt Romney, just weeks before the election.

The pro-President Obama lawyer is rumoured to be preparing for her so-called 'October surprise' in which she will strike the Republican presidential hopeful's chances by unearthing some sort of secret or scandal.


Ms Allred has refused to comment on the rumours, which first surfaced in a tweet by the Drudge Report's Matt Drudge on Thursday.

'Here she comes. Hearing Gloria Allred out there again, about to make a move. After all, it's her time of the campaign. Team O at the ready!!' Mr Drudge wrote on Twitter.


According to RadarOnline.com, Ms Allred launched a last minute strike on GOP Meg Whitman's campaign for governor of California by representing a disgruntled former housekeeper.


In the pivotal moments of the campaign, the lawyer wheeled out Nicky Diaz who alleged that she was fired by the Whitman family because she was an illegal immigrant.


Whitman went on to lose the election to Democrat Jerry Brown.


Ms Allred refused to confirm or deny the rumors regarding Governor Romney.

From Gweed's toilet paper: http://www.drudge.com/news/162219/gloria-allred-planning-october-surprise

A Mexican maid with a Romney love child? I doubt it....but what?

[guido911]

Drudge retort?

[Teatownclown]

Drudge retort?

You're a bubble head, but grasp onto this: United States, Iran agree to one-on-one nuclear talks : New York Times
                                           http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/20/us-usa-iran-nuclear-idUSBRE89J0GD20121020

                      (Reuters) - The United States and Iran have agreed for the first time to one-on-one negotiations on Iran's nuclear program, the New York Times reported on Saturday, citing Obama administration officials.

Iranian officials have insisted the talks not begin until after the November 6 U.S. election because they want to know which U.S. president they will be negotiating with, a senior administration official told the Times.

The Times said the agreement was the result of secret exchanges between American and Iranian officials that date almost to the beginning of President Barack Obama's term in 2009.

The White House declined to comment on the Times report when contacted by Reuters.

The United States and other Western powers have charged that Iran's nuclear program is aimed at developing nuclear weapons, but Tehran insists the program is for peaceful purposes. Israel has said it would use military force to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power.

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has attacked Obama for failing to curb Iran's nuclear ambitions. The two candidates will meet on Monday in their final debate, which will focus on foreign policy.

The U.S.-Iranian agreement had been reached with senior Iranian officials who report to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, an unnamed administration official told the Times.

(Reporting by Todd Eastham, editing By Paul Simao)

[heironymouspasparagus]

Well, not that I believe it, but it wouldn't work. Carter was one of the worst Presidents ever.

Says the guest who slept through the two Baby Bush terms....



Yeah, I know it's old but it is still valid.

[Conan71]

You're a bubble head, but grasp onto this: United States, Iran agree to one-on-one nuclear talks : New York Times
                                           http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/20/us-usa-iran-nuclear-idUSBRE89J0GD20121020

                      (Reuters) - The United States and Iran have agreed for the first time to one-on-one negotiations on Iran's nuclear program, the New York Times reported on Saturday, citing Obama administration officials.

Iranian officials have insisted the talks not begin until after the November 6 U.S. election because they want to know which U.S. president they will be negotiating with, a senior administration official told the Times.

The Times said the agreement was the result of secret exchanges between American and Iranian officials that date almost to the beginning of President Barack Obama's term in 2009.

The White House declined to comment on the Times report when contacted by Reuters.

The United States and other Western powers have charged that Iran's nuclear program is aimed at developing nuclear weapons, but Tehran insists the program is for peaceful purposes. Israel has said it would use military force to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power.

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has attacked Obama for failing to curb Iran's nuclear ambitions. The two candidates will meet on Monday in their final debate, which will focus on foreign policy.

The U.S.-Iranian agreement had been reached with senior Iranian officials who report to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, an unnamed administration official told the Times.

(Reporting by Todd Eastham, editing By Paul Simao)

Obvious Axelrod leak.  We knew this was coming.  Not enough to save Obama's sinking campaign, clown.

[Hoss]

Obvious Axelrod leak.  We knew this was coming.  Not enough to save Obama's sinking campaign, clown.

Then I guess it's a race to see who's campaign sinks faster.  My bet is on the robot.

[heironymouspasparagus]

Obvious Axelrod leak.  We knew this was coming.  Not enough to save Obama's sinking campaign, clown.

I originally thought that the next 'debate' would be just as valuable cancelled as not.  May not be that way.  Obama's got a couple of positives to talk about - successfully unleashing the "hounds of he$$" * on Bin Laden, and getting us out of Iraq.  

Mitt with Ryan at his back brings us the promise of yet another unnecessary war.  (This is ALL about inciting Armageddon in our time, since the radical religious extremists are trying so hard to "push" God's hand in this - since they obviously know the real meaning of scripture better than He does.)

This could almost be interesting.


** Meaning, of course, those Warrior Angels, like my nephew, that do that kind of work to try to protect us and keep all that carp over there instead of here.  And I appreciate that more than I can express to them.

[Teatownclown]

Short the Robot, Hoss! http://www.intrade.com/v4/markets/contract/?contractId=743475

Iran, like U.S., denies plan for one-on-one nuclear talks
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-rt-us-iran-nuclear-usabre89k05n-20121021,0,3369893.story


disinformation and purposeful omission work great when it's your side controlling the discussion....  

[Teatownclown]

Obvious Axelrod leak.  We knew this was coming.  Not enough to save Obama's sinking campaign, clown.

DOLT ALERT! http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/10/21/1054801/graham-iran-talking-over/ Lindsey Graham is a Gready Obstructionist Pig.
War Monger Graham should know the difference between enriching uranium and making a weapon. Ughh, I hate it when these guys play on America's ignorunt class....

[nathanm]

Obvious Axelrod leak.  We knew this was coming.  Not enough to save Obama's sinking campaign, clown.

Bizarrely, the White House denied the report. And you've got a bit of wishful thinking going on there.