Keating 5 ring a bell?

[Conan71]

quote:Originally posted by waterboy

quote:Originally posted by thetysonwynn

I simply did not misspell anything. I refuse to look at any evidence you might show me that might indicate that I did. Further, if I look at the evidence, I refuse to accept it, regardless of how overwhelming it is.

Pretty untenable isn't it? That is precisely what some of you here are doing in regards to the Keating 5 incident.

I did not quote Miss Coulter, as I know she causes something akin to Bush derangement syndrome with some of you. I did, however, quote the Democrat counsel who investigated him and said, in short, there was nothing there. Further, even if it was gleaned from an Ann Coulter column, truth does not magically morph into fiction because you don't like the person quoting it.

You can choose to continue to believe he was guilty with all your heart. It does not make him guilty.

I was making a point, and if you want to call that a lie, you are welcome to do so. There's no use debating with people who are not reasonable; I'm through. Which, I believe, is what you wanted. Merry Christmas.

Relax. No one wants you to leave. Least not me. I lived through the S&L fiasco and recently refreshed my memory by reading some old articles. I didn't say he was guilty of anything. From what I can tell it was exactly as I posted above. He hung out with some bad guys who used him and almost got him in trouble. He was not found guilty of a crime but as the feds noted, some used some really bad judgement. It was by his own admission a mistake to do so.

Bad judgement. Kind of like mentioning Coulter in literate circles.[]

Probably as much a "feh" issue as Obama/Rezko.

McCain would not still be in the Senate if he were complicit in that affair.