News:

Long overdue maintenance happening. See post in the top forum.

Main Menu

Attention Whore's on Display

Started by guido911, May 14, 2009, 06:22:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

guido911

Here is Code Pink at it again, this time in Israel protesting its treatment of those poor, innocent palestinians. Funny moment:  One Code Pinker gets clobbered:



I also read today that former president, and attention whore in his own right, Jimmuh Carter was almost in tears over the destruction in Gaza (or somewhere) by those mean ol' Jews.
Someone get Hoss a pacifier.

tim huntzinger

Quote from: guido911 on June 16, 2009, 07:46:55 PM
Here is Code Pink at it again, this time in Israel protesting its treatment of those poor, innocent palestinians. Funny moment:  One Code Pinker gets clobbered:



I also read today that former president, and attention whore in his own right, Jimmuh Carter was almost in tears over the destruction in Gaza (or somewhere) by those mean ol' Jews.

What is wrong with you? You just do not get it.  Funny? A non-violent protester gets abused by heavily armed NWO troops and you applaud, even laugh? Yet when an OHP-NWO troop abuses a paramedic we should be SHOCKED?  Further, your filthy monicker is now being used agains women - and yet no one objects.  Whores.  Despicable, vile terms leveled against conscientious protesters.  And will it be funny when 'Tea Party' protesters are ruffed up? Or those stupid, disgusting 'pro-lifers' get their arms broken and maced in the face for daring to carry a sign?

WAKE UP! I disagree with Carter an overwhelming majority of the time but I figger as a former president he has earned his soapbox.  What did you do to earn the right to disparage these people in such despicable terms? Oh.

As angry as I am at you for using such venomous language, I would never applaud your abuse at the hands of the Pretorian Guard or their trainees.

PepePeru

Quote from: Know Nothing on June 18, 2009, 08:49:37 AM
What is wrong with you? You just do not get it.  Funny? A non-violent protester gets abused by heavily armed NWO troops and you applaud, even laugh? Yet when an OHP-NWO troop abuses a paramedic we should be SHOCKED?  Further, your filthy monicker is now being used agains women - and yet no one objects.  Whores.  Despicable, vile terms leveled against conscientious protesters.  And will it be funny when 'Tea Party' protesters are ruffed up? Or those stupid, disgusting 'pro-lifers' get their arms broken and maced in the face for daring to carry a sign?

WAKE UP! I disagree with Carter an overwhelming majority of the time but I figger as a former president he has earned his soapbox.  What did you do to earn the right to disparage these people in such despicable terms? Oh.

As angry as I am at you for using such venomous language, I would never applaud your abuse at the hands of the Pretorian Guard or their trainees.


the self-aggrandizing guido911 alleged military service gives him a super-sized helping of freedom that you should be denied.
I never imagined that cleaning a toilet could ever garner so much self satisfaction from someone.

guido911

A non-violent protester? These folks are in Israel and some moronic protesters are in that country comparing the plight of the palestenians to the Holocaust? Whatever. And know nothing, I could care less whether you are angry at me about anything. Take that anger along with president peanut farmer and stick it somewhere.

I love it when Code Pink get pwned. These f&ckers protested outside Walter Reed where our soldiers were recovering from combat injuries.

Someone get Hoss a pacifier.

tim huntzinger

Quote from: guido911 on June 18, 2009, 09:42:33 AM
A non-violent protester? These folks are in Israel and some moronic protesters are in that country comparing the plight of the palestenians to the Holocaust? Whatever. And know nothing, I could care less whether you are angry at me about anything. Take that anger along with president peanut farmer and stick it somewhere.

I love it when Code Pink get pwned. These f&ckers protested outside Walter Reed where our soldiers were recovering from combat injuries.



Nicely done!  That really responds to the gist of my point.  I will stick my viewpoint somewhere:  calling people who stand up for their beliefs despicable names is a sign of real sickness, IMO.  You really just do not get it, or you do get it and are so brainwashed and/or willfully ignorant that you do not care how vile the things you say are.  And through this, I still hold out hope for you and do not condemn you.

The Police State is the Police State is the Police State.  'Pro-life' means more than being anti-abortion.  A former POTUS is entitled to his soap-box - whether I agree or not.  I do not know what the Code Pinkers were saying outside of WR, may have been something as despicable as what you say.  Maybe they were protesting the conditions inside of that snake-pit.  Maybe they were calling for end to the Occupation of Iraq so that more soldiers were not maimed and traumatized by this Council on Foreign Relations' adventure.

And just so you know: when the anti-war protesters were at 21st/Yale before the Invasion, I counter-protested.  I have come a long way in my understanding.  How about you? Do you understand that 1.3 million Iraqis died in this adventure? Do you not know that the USA is now the world's largest drug dealer by allowing heroin and high-grade pot to be grown and harvested in Afghanistan - and yet we spend BILLIONS flying choppers around our nation looking for patches of dope and raiding it like the growers were Al-queda?

But no, you are more concerned calling people filthy, vile names.  How sad!

guido911

Quote from: Know Nothing on June 18, 2009, 09:57:46 AM

And just so you know: when the anti-war protesters were at 21st/Yale before the Invasion, I counter-protested.  I have come a long way in my understanding.  How about you? Do you understand that 1.3 million Iraqis died in this adventure? Do you not know that the USA is now the world's largest drug dealer by allowing heroin and high-grade pot to be grown and harvested in Afghanistan - and yet we spend BILLIONS flying choppers around our nation looking for patches of dope and raiding it like the growers were Al-queda?


Wow, what a load of BS that is. The USA are drug dealers because we allegedly "allow" another sovereign country to grow pot? 1.3M Iraqi's have died? Where did you get that information? The same unfiltered news source as aox?



Take you opinions and mindless, rambling sanctimony somewhere else.

Someone get Hoss a pacifier.

tim huntzinger

Quote from: guido911 on June 18, 2009, 10:46:20 AM
Wow, what a load of BS that is. The USA are drug dealers because we allegedly "allow" another sovereign country to grow pot? 1.3M Iraqi's have died? Where did you get that information? The same unfiltered news source as aox?



Take you opinions and mindless, rambling sanctimony somewhere else.



Same foolish responses.  What a shame.  Still no morality that guides the G-dawg.  Just hate.

guido911

Still waiting for that source on 1.3M Iraqis killed and a response to my pointing out your bogus U.S. largest drug dealer charge. /crickets.
Someone get Hoss a pacifier.

tim huntzinger

Quote from: guido911 on June 18, 2009, 11:38:07 AM
Still waiting for that source on 1.3M Iraqis killed and a response to my pointing out your bogus U.S. largest drug dealer charge. /crickets.

John Tirman, Executive Director of MIT's Center for International Studies.  Here: http://web.mit.edu/humancostiraq/

Do you understand that the Department of Defense is training its officers that protests are 'low level terrorism'?  Is that funny to you?  The US Northern Command is preparing for Martial Law.  Your rights are being hijacked and you laugh.  You one funny guy.

If you want to argue that the world's second-poorest nation has the ability to successfully wage a drug war against itself when that has not worked in America despite trillions of dollars and decades of trying - uh, okay.  The world's most powerful army is in control of that territory, not the Afghan military.

What was the gist of Code Pink's Walter Reed protests? Oh.  'Bring them home.'  What monsters!








guido911

Quote from: Know Nothing on June 19, 2009, 07:18:51 AM
John Tirman, Executive Director of MIT's Center for International Studies.  Here: http://web.mit.edu/humancostiraq/

Do you understand that the Department of Defense is training its officers that protests are 'low level terrorism'?  Is that funny to you?  The US Northern Command is preparing for Martial Law.  Your rights are being hijacked and you laugh.  You one funny guy.

If you want to argue that the world's second-poorest nation has the ability to successfully wage a drug war against itself when that has not worked in America despite trillions of dollars and decades of trying - uh, okay.  The world's most powerful army is in control of that territory, not the Afghan military.

What was the gist of Code Pink's Walter Reed protests? Oh.  'Bring them home.'  What monsters!


Getting past your BS hyperbole is getting harder every day.


As for Code Pink, who care what the "gist" was or their goals; this is what their signs read:

"Maimed for Lies" and "Enlist here and die for Halliburton."

How nice for our wounded heroes having that waived at them. Here are other gems from these dumba$$es:





And please tell me this is not true and photoshopped:



Even Bawney Fwank got after Code Pink:



Someone get Hoss a pacifier.

tim huntzinger

Quote from: guido911 on June 19, 2009, 12:41:58 PM
Getting past your BS hyperbole is getting harder every day.


As for Code Pink, who care what the "gist" was or their goals; this is what their signs read:

"Maimed for Lies" and "Enlist here and die for Halliburton."

How nice for our wounded heroes having that waived at them. Here are other gems from these dumba$$es:







And please tell me this is not true and photoshopped:



Even Bawney Fwank got after Code Pink:





No doubt about it, those are reprehensible sentiments but there is no proof those were taken at Walter Reed.  Was Condi being shamed at Walter Reed, too?

Yup. 1.3 million.  Funny how that just breezed by you.  And from an MIT egghead comes that fact!  And we all KNOW that ANYONE from MIT is automatically smarter and more erudite and above any and all reproach.  People from MIT are endowed with godlike intellects and are able to become experts automatically with just a breezy examination of any and allllllll issues!  So worship the MIT study, bow to it, it is all seeing and all-knowing!  Ha ha ha!

Yup.  Protesters are on the first step of terrorism.  Do you want to dispute that or are yew abel tu guugle that?

guido911

1.3M? Your source, The Nation :D, stated 800K-1.3M.
Claims of "victory" and the human cost in the Bush years

A new analysis of the total fatalities in the Iraq war during the presidency of George W. Bush demonstrates that the likely number is between 800,000 and 1.3 million. The analysis appears in The Nation (Feb. 16, 2009)[/font]

Nothing like a 500,000 dead disparity to give credibility to your big, bad MIT source.

As for the pics, I stated what their signs said at Walter Reed you ignorant bozo. The other signs were from other Code Pink events. Eff Code Pink and those that give them a platform or justify their conduct

As for terrorists, who cares about government hyperbole/labeling. I was at the tea parties and a counter protest of the greatest attention whore, Cindy Sheehan. If I'm a terrorist because of that, who freakin cares.

You are boring me to no end. Arguing with you is like arguing with my three year old (except he occasionally wins).
Someone get Hoss a pacifier.

we vs us

The "We Support The Murder of American Troops" photo is 'shopped, probably by these guys, who thoughtfully left their watermark. 

Also, "We support our troops when they shoot their officers" wasn't Code Pink either.  According to rightie mag FrontPage, "You can see the creator of the banner in the photograph; he's the one on the right wearing the black ski-mask . . .  [he] places himself on the political spectrum as a "class-war anarchist," and member of a 25-strong Bay Area collective named "Class War."

In other words, thanks for the Two Minute Hate, there, Guido.

tim huntzinger

Yup. Right there. 1.3 M, and from one of them MIT brainaics.  And that is not including the 500K BABIES who died because of the feckless UN sanctions.  Babieeeeeeees Guido, newwwwwwwboooooorrrrrns. Ewwwwwwww.  So there is premise to say 1.3, and you think lowering that to 600K is a victory for righteousness?  Baaaaabeeees.

And again no response from 'Mr 1st Amendment' about the MILITARY classifying protests as stage one terrorists.  This dude claims he joined the Army to scrub toilets for free speech and when presented with the fact that free speech is being flushed down the toidy hole BY THE MILITARY he worships he shrugs.

Did you take those pics at Walter Reed yourself? How do you know where they were taken? Was Barney at Walter Reed? Was Condi?  C'mon now.  Think it through.  You can do it.

You teaching that little kid of yours to call people names, laugh when women are hurt by men, and to grovel at the feet of the State? I hope not.

tim huntzinger

Quote from: we vs us on June 19, 2009, 07:26:23 PM
The "We Support The Murder of American Troops" photo is 'shopped, probably by these guys, who thoughtfully left their watermark. 

Also, "We support our troops when they shoot their officers" wasn't Code Pink either.  According to rightie mag FrontPage, "You can see the creator of the banner in the photograph; he's the one on the right wearing the black ski-mask . . .  [he] places himself on the political spectrum as a "class-war anarchist," and member of a 25-strong Bay Area collective named "Class War."

In other words, thanks for the Two Minute Hate, there, Guido.

Thanks for pointing that out.  That sign is so obviously shopped.  Guess it shows some latent bias on my part that I missed that.  I am learning.