A grassroots organization focused on the intelligent and sustainable development, preservation and revitalization of Tulsa.
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 29, 2024, 03:36:03 am
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: South Tulsa Bridge Update  (Read 69147 times)
HDPokeFan
Guest
« Reply #45 on: August 27, 2009, 08:24:39 pm »

Although I don't want any homes torn down and hopefully that won't have to be done, the homes you mentioned were built after INCOG came up with the plan with the toll bridge.  Almost all of the homes built on Yale were built well before INCOG came up with that idea.

From 81st to 91st on Yale is one lane.  Only about half of 91st to 101st is multiple lanes.  So significant improvements and an incredible amount of money will need to be spent.  Why should Tulsa widen all the way to 121st when there is absolutely no need to?  Very little financial benefit for Tulsa with a very high cost. 

This is one issue I have to commend our city leaders.  All City Councilors and the Mayor unanimously to stop the bridge. 
Logged
Red Arrow
T-Town Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 10941


WWW
« Reply #46 on: August 27, 2009, 10:03:13 pm »

Although I don't want any homes torn down and hopefully that won't have to be done, the homes you mentioned were built after INCOG came up with the plan with the toll bridge.  Almost all of the homes built on Yale were built well before INCOG came up with that idea.  The space east to west across the Yale from property fence to property fence south of the turnpike is already wide enough for 4 lanes, or more.  So it appears that Yale has been planned to be more than two lanes for quite a while.  I agree over the hill between 81st and 91st is an obstacle.

From 81st to 91st on Yale is one lane in each direction, most of the mile.  Only about half of 91st to 101st is multiple lanes. Like I said, from the turnpike to 91st. So significant improvements and an incredible amount of money will need to be spent.  Why should Tulsa widen all the way to 121st when there is absolutely no need to? We disagree here.  It' the same as not widening Memorial south of Woodland Hills when it was built in the mid 70s.  Very little financial benefit for Tulsa (I disagree.) with a very high cost.  I am in favor of the Toll Bridge (read Bixby, Glenpool, and Jenks residents) paying for the majority of those improvements.  Otherwise, Tulsa will eventually pay for all the improvements.  They will come. Maybe not for 10 to 15 years, but they will come.

This is one issue I have to commend our city leaders.  All City Councilors and the Mayor unanimously to stop the bridge.  The opportunity may or may not have already existed to make the bridge pay for improvements to Yale and Delaware.  Tulsa needs to make that happen.
Logged

 
Red Arrow
T-Town Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 10941


WWW
« Reply #47 on: August 29, 2009, 10:48:54 pm »

I drove over the Yale Hill (between 81st and 91st) today to refresh my memory.  The intersections at both 81st and 91st along Yale have been widened, leaving about 3/4 mile to be widened over the hill.  The property fence lines over the hill make it obvious that Yale is planned to be at least 4 lanes, two in each direction.  I won't make any claims about it being inexpensive.
Logged

 
TurismoDreamin
Civic Leader
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 206


« Reply #48 on: September 03, 2009, 07:58:59 pm »

Just wanted to bring this to an update.

This was in the paper today:
http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?subjectid=11&articleid=20090903_11_0_TheSou572024
Logged

SXSW
City Father
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4887


WWW
« Reply #49 on: September 04, 2009, 07:46:22 am »

I drove over the Yale Hill (between 81st and 91st) today to refresh my memory.  The intersections at both 81st and 91st along Yale have been widened, leaving about 3/4 mile to be widened over the hill.  The property fence lines over the hill make it obvious that Yale is planned to be at least 4 lanes, two in each direction.  I won't make any claims about it being inexpensive.

That would be a difficult project as the grade is fairly steep on that stretch of Yale.  It would 'complete' Yale though as a major 4 lane corridor through Tulsa from Pine to 121st and (if the bridge is built) across the river.
Logged

 
Red Arrow
T-Town Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 10941


WWW
« Reply #50 on: September 04, 2009, 11:41:56 am »

That would be a difficult project as the grade is fairly steep on that stretch of Yale.  It would 'complete' Yale though as a major 4 lane corridor through Tulsa from Pine to 121st and (if the bridge is built) across the river.

You've lived in the flat lands too long.  Smiley
Logged

 
TheArtist
T-Town Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 6804



WWW
« Reply #51 on: September 04, 2009, 12:47:14 pm »

You've lived in the flat lands too long.  Smiley

But its a HUGE! MOUNTAIN! that will require incredible feats of engineering.  Tongue
Logged

"When you only have two pennies left in the world, buy a loaf of bread with one, and a lily with the other."-Chinese proverb. "Arts a staple. Like bread or wine or a warm coat in winter. Those who think it is a luxury have only a fragment of a mind. Mans spirit grows hungry for art in the same way h
SXSW
City Father
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4887


WWW
« Reply #52 on: September 04, 2009, 02:42:06 pm »

But its a HUGE! MOUNTAIN! that will require incredible feats of engineering.  Tongue

Why don't we just build a tunnel?   Wink
Logged

 
Bat Bat
Activist
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 59


Holy haberdashery, Batman!


« Reply #53 on: September 04, 2009, 02:48:48 pm »

Or a gondola lift.
Logged
Red Arrow
T-Town Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 10941


WWW
« Reply #54 on: September 04, 2009, 05:53:57 pm »

Why don't we just build a tunnel?   Wink

Except for the mega $, that would be a nice idea.  It would also solve the grade problem for a (real) trolley.  I won't hold my breath.

Logged

 
Red Arrow
T-Town Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 10941


WWW
« Reply #55 on: September 04, 2009, 05:55:30 pm »

Or a gondola lift.


That might make a nice pedestrian attraction.  Get above the trees and you should have a good view.  I won't hold my breath on this one either.
Logged

 
Townsend
T-Town Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 12195



« Reply #56 on: October 29, 2012, 11:26:00 am »

Cousins Park project put on hold for bridge talks

http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?subjectid=11&articleid=20121029_16_A1_CUTLIN228279

Quote
Design work on Grace K. Cousins Park in south Tulsa has been put on hold to give city officials time to consider how a Bixby proposal for a toll bridge across the Arkansas River would affect the project.

The proposed bridge would land just south of the park, at about 124th Street, and include an extension of South Delaware Avenue through Cousins Park to 121st Street.

"It is a disappointment, and it is not what the family intended as an honor to Grace Cousins," John Shivel said. "It would potentially destroy the value to the citizens of the possible park."

Shivel, whose deceased wife, Vicki Cousins Shivel, spent the last days of her life working to see the park constructed in honor of her mother, said city officials never notified him about the bridge project and its potential effect on the park.

"No conversation whatsoever," Shivel said.

As recently as mid-July, city officials were speaking glowingly of the proposed park and even attended a fundraising kickoff sponsored by Park Friends Inc.

Among those at the fundraiser was Dale McNamara, Tulsa Park and Recreation Board chairwoman, who said Wednesday that the board has been kept in the dark about the bridge discussions.

"There is nothing I hate more than surprises," McNamara said.

"And this change in plans is totally new, and I am at a mystery as to why we have not heard from the mayor's office."

Park and Recreation Director Lucy Dolman said the department halted the design work in late July after Tulsa City Councilor Phil Lakin and Bixby city officials presented a schematic rendering showing the proposed location of the bridge.



Dolman said her department did not notify the park board or the Cousins family because the issue is still being examined.

As part of that process, the city is creating a rendering that will show several proposed locations for the road through the park.

"The idea would be, when you get the information, you can decide what is the best-case scenario, or do we have to do something else?" Dolman said. "We are flexible; we are adaptable."


Bixby Mayor Ray Bowen has said his city would propose spending its $11.3 million share of Vision2 funds on helping to build a bridge somewhere on the river, if voters approve the initiative Nov. 6.

Bixby City Manager Doug Enevoldsen described the schematic presented to Tulsa officials in July as "a very preliminary concept for discussion purposes ... it is not set in concrete."

Enevoldsen said the proposal was created in consultation with numerous stakeholders, including those who have previously opposed construction of a south Tulsa bridge.

The proposed bridge would not be privately owned, would not back up traffic along Yale Avenue and would come with the needed infrastructure to accommodate additional traffic on the Tulsa side of the bridge - all conditions that opponents of previous bridge proposals have demanded will be met, Enevoldsen said.

"We envision this having public ownership, possibly with partnership with the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority," Enevoldsen said.

He said he expects that Tulsa County could be a partner in the project but that there are no plans now to request funding from any municipalities.

The bridge as currently proposed would land in Jenks on the west side of the Arkansas River.

Tulsa Mayor Dewey Bartlett said discussions with the city of Bixby about a possible south Tulsa bridge have been just that - discussions and that no decisions have been made.

"This has been going on for 10, 20 years," Bartlett said. "It is just a continuation of that.

"I think what people are trying to do is come up with an idea or a concept of providing a bridge across the Arkansas River that is acceptable to the powers that be."

Bartlett said the city never intended to keep anyone in the dark about the proposed bridge or its potential impact on Cousins Park.

"There has to be a significant amount of communication between a variety of departments in the city," Bartlett said.

"Everybody has to communicate well and come to some agreement on what we should do before we get too involved in drawing up plans because things change."

Charles Cousins conceived of the park in the late 1970s or early '80s as a tribute to his wife, Grace Cousins.

The Cousins family donated 10 acres at the southwest corner of 121st and Yale to the city Park and Recreation Department in 1998, with the stipulation that it remain a conservation area and that the family be involved in its design.

A few years ago, the city bought 35 more acres bounded by 121st Street, Yale Avenue and the Arkansas River for $950,000 with the intention of eventually turning the entire site into a park.

As currently proposed, Cousins Park would be a combination nature center, nature preserve and pioneer park operated with assistance from the Oxley Nature Center Association.

Conceptual designs call for the construction of a farm house, barn, corral, orchard and a schoolhouse that could be used for conducting classes.

The city has committed $244,375 for Phase I of the project, which was scheduled to begin construction by July 2012.

The additional $2.2 million to complete the final three phases was to be raised through private donations.

Logged
sgrizzle
Kung Fu Treachery
T-Town Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 16038


Inconceivable!


WWW
« Reply #57 on: October 29, 2012, 12:51:17 pm »

Two things scare me about this
1. That this is how Bixby wants to utilize Vision2 money
2. The design

A cloverleaf? Telling people you're not going to drastically increase traffic in the area, but then give it a cloverleaf?

It's own access road through city property?

Also, no tie whatsoever to Yale?
Logged
carltonplace
Historic Artifact
City Father
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4587



WWW
« Reply #58 on: October 29, 2012, 12:56:55 pm »

Two things scare me about this
1. That this is how Bixby wants to utilize Vision2 money
2. The design

A cloverleaf? Telling people you're not going to drastically increase traffic in the area, but then give it a cloverleaf?

It's own access road through city property?

Also, no tie whatsoever to Yale?

not quite a "conservation area" if there is a roadway running through it.
Logged
RecycleMichael
truth teller
T-Town Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 12913


« Reply #59 on: October 29, 2012, 01:23:26 pm »

I would think a bridge running straight north and south and connecting to Delaware would be cheaper than what they are trying to do.

Look at the map and draw the red line straight north.

Yes, it would make for a longer bridge. 
Logged

Power is nothing till you use it.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

 
  Hosted by TulsaConnect and Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
 

Mission

 

"TulsaNow's Mission is to help Tulsa become the most vibrant, diverse, sustainable and prosperous city of our size. We achieve this by focusing on the development of Tulsa's distinctive identity and economic growth around a dynamic, urban core, complemented by a constellation of livable, thriving communities."
more...

 

Contact

 

2210 S Main St.
Tulsa, OK 74114
(918) 409-2669
info@tulsanow.org