Tulsa Today Mayoral Notes

[David Arnett]

For your consideration and comment www.TulsaToday.com has posted an election review titled, "Upcoming election fundamentals."  We will, in the near future, allow comments on stories within the site, but until that time, we do enjoy reading Tulsa Now as one of many sites that track the pulse of our community.  We will not answer here and know that some will use this opportunity for yet another personal attack, but we love you-all anyway and we will read what you say. 

[Townsend]

Not the most inviting way to start a dialog.

[rwarn17588]

Translation: "It's all your fault that I was caught on TulsaNow lifting wholesale sections of Wikipedia without proper attribution, and I'm still p*ssed."

[RecycleMichael]

Not the most inviting way to start a dialog.

No kidding. I read it as, "I am promoting my website using your website, but I don't want to actually let anybody else talk to me."

[Conan71]

Translation: "It's all your fault that I was caught on TulsaNow lifting wholesale sections of Wikipedia without proper attribution, and I'm still p*ssed."

Just tell me where to mail the check, you're this month's winner.

[MDepr2007]

Gosh , that story reads like he is trying to get a job at the Tulsa World. He does fit in with most of the posters here though. Hmmm maybe he is FOTD 

[Conan71]

Sounds like Mudschlock is Arnett's guy: (from Tulsatoday)

"Chris Medlock – Republican.  Strange as it may sound, this Republican candidate is following Obama's style, but from the right of the political spectrum – a campaign of insult and glittering generalities.  Medlock is a proven serial liar.  He is a demagogue using insubstantial twisted thought to demonize people and issues to the detriment of civic problem solving.  He did so repeatedly when briefly elected to the City Council.  The conspiracy fantasies he promoted (school mates conspire in corruption, the BOK Center will never be built, etc.) while, again briefly, hosting a local radio talk show were, at best, stupid and damaging to listeners new in their interest in public policy. 

Medlock's attempt at a political career began as Liberal Democrat, then pro-abortion Republican, now he is on the right tip of the right wing.  He is an ambition extremist looking for a constituency.  Despite his pointless press releases, private polling suggests Medlock will earn less than 10 percent of the vote.  http://www.medlockformayor.com"

[cannon_fodder]

Well, all other things aside, thanks for posting a link to your thoughts and information on the Mayoral candidates.  I hope you engage in discussions on the issue here as well as in your own domain.  As much as people may disagree with you and mock you for plagiarizing Wikipedia, I'm sure you have some incite to add.

[David Arnett]

Thank you for demonstrating the level of conversation on public issues available in this forum.  This was a test and the results helpful as considerations are underway for Tulsa Today to add additional methods of interaction and discussion.  We were having an internal debate and your responses settled the question.

For the record:
1.)  The Tulsa World doesn't have enough money for me to work for them.  I already earn more hourly than they pay top management.

2.) The charge of "plagiarizing" is false as moderators on this forum or any attorney would know.  Also, if that is the best false charge my opponents can bring – pretty weak.

3.) Yes, I did post here to see if any traffic would flow from this source and our traffic tracker did not find a significant increase.

4.) Recycle Michael – Contributions from both City and County budgets allow you to sit on this forum during working hours and many folk question why?

5.) Conan71 – I am a Christian - not perfect (or even close), but forgiven.  The tag line on your nickname is offensive.  If the point is to offend and drive Christians away, congratulations you win.

6.) No serious discussion occurred here within a news cycle. 

7.) I wish all who post here the best, but ... bye.

[guido911]

Translation: "It's all your fault that I was caught on TulsaNow lifting wholesale sections of Wikipedia without proper attribution, and I'm still p*ssed."

Why does this guy believe he is important? Seriously.

[Townsend]

I've only met him once and he seemed pretty normal but I guess my impression was wrong.

He appears to be a worthless jawbone.

[Conan71]

5.) Conan71 – I am a Christian - not perfect (or even close), but forgiven.  The tag line on your nickname is offensive.  If the point is to offend and drive Christians away, congratulations you win.

YESSSSS!!!!  I finally won something!!!!

For those of you who were not previously aware, you have just seen a classic and typical hissy fit by the only Tulsan with a worse case of megalomania then Chris Mudschlock.

Dave, you know what they say:  "If you've got to tell people you're a Christian..."

[rwarn17588]

I'm sure you have some incite to add.

Unintentionally hilarious typo of the week.

[TURobY]

Thank you for demonstrating the level of conversation on public issues available in this forum.  This was a test and the results helpful as considerations are underway for Tulsa Today to add additional methods of interaction and discussion.  We were having an internal debate and your responses settled the question.

For the record:
1.)  The Tulsa World doesn't have enough money for me to work for them.  I already earn more hourly than they pay top management.

2.) The charge of "plagiarizing" is false as moderators on this forum or any attorney would know.  Also, if that is the best false charge my opponents can bring – pretty weak.

3.) Yes, I did post here to see if any traffic would flow from this source and our traffic tracker did not find a significant increase.

4.) Recycle Michael – Contributions from both City and County budgets allow you to sit on this forum during working hours and many folk question why?

5.) Conan71 – I am a Christian - not perfect (or even close), but forgiven.  The tag line on your nickname is offensive.  If the point is to offend and drive Christians away, congratulations you win.

6.) No serious discussion occurred here within a news cycle. 

7.) I wish all who post here the best, but ... bye.

What?

[rwarn17588]

2.) The charge of "plagiarizing" is false as moderators on this forum or any attorney would know.  Also, if that is the best false charge my opponents can bring – pretty weak.

I didn't bring up the word "plagiarizing." You did.