News:

Long overdue maintenance happening. See post in the top forum.

Main Menu

COBURN MUST RESIGN!

Started by FOTD, October 02, 2009, 11:56:00 AM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3 4 5
User actions

Conan71

#30
October 05, 2009, 04:33:18 PM
Quote from: RecycleMichael on October 05, 2009, 04:21:33 PM
Almost every republican I know has been bashing Dewey Bartlett. Bash someone new.

Yeah, well just about every Dimocrat bashes Harry Reid too, not much of an accomplishment.  Does it help that I'm a Mayor Taylor spooner?

"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan

RecycleMichael

#31
October 05, 2009, 04:34:11 PM
You could be a good democrat...come on over!
Power is nothing till you use it.

okiebybirth

#32
October 06, 2009, 01:42:36 AM
Quote from: Conan71 on October 05, 2009, 09:27:31 AM
You know:

A) Nothing about the law if you think this was a bribe
B) Nothing about me and obviously don't read the forum much if you think I'm a homophobe.  Rachel Maddow is a charicature of a serious journalist. 

Tom Coburn wasn't representing the state of Oklahoma in this matter.  If anything it sounds like he was acting in his capacity as a friend and room mate, not a legislator.  Legislators do have private lives.  I assure you, if I sensed there was anything illegal about Coburn's actions, I'd be all over it.

If you don't like Coburn, why are you wasting bandwidth over it.  Vote to fire him in Nov. 2010 if you think he's such a doosh.

Conan, I'm not assuming you are a homophobe, I'm saying your characterization of Rachel Maddow was homophobic.  Calling Rachel a agnostic lesbian as a way to dismiss her opinion and attack her is out of line, that's my point.

Conan71

#33
October 06, 2009, 10:39:48 AM Last Edit: October 06, 2009, 10:41:25 AM by Conan71
Quote from: okiebybirth on October 06, 2009, 01:42:36 AM
Conan, I'm not assuming you are a homophobe, I'm saying your characterization of Rachel Maddow was homophobic.  Calling Rachel a agnostic lesbian as a way to dismiss her opinion and attack her is out of line, that's my point.

Follow the line of banter FOTD and I usually have and you will get the gist of what was going on with that comment.  I really don't care two whits about her sexual or religious preference.  FOTD posts her videos almost as if it's scholarly work, she's a commentator, not a journalist.  Just like Limbaugh, just like Hannity, just like Olbermann or Matthews.  Sorry if it offended you in any way, I'm just an angry protestant white man. ;)
"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan

sgrizzle

#34
October 06, 2009, 10:47:28 AM
Quote from: okiebybirth on October 06, 2009, 01:42:36 AM
Calling Rachel a agnostic lesbian as a way to dismiss her opinion and attack her is out of line, that's my point.

If she is an agnostic lesbian then calling her such is no worse than calling out "the religious right."

FOTD

#35
October 06, 2009, 12:02:31 PM
She's much more credible than your sources. And she's got a journalism background.

Don't attack me just because Rachel Maddow comes up with the truthful real news stories instead of hate monger inept foreign owned tv entertainment tyranny. You're just upset over the  lack of power thingy, CoCo puff.

Here, Rachel calling out Inhofe on rouge foreign power....he's a traitor. You will not find this in any Oklahoma News Agencies!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/vp/33185390#33185390
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/33185390#33185390

The republicans are nothing less than anarchists and are doing everything in their small squaller of power to stab our leader in the back. Incredible you would go after the credible journalists. Please tell us, where and when did Rachel Maddow misrepresent the facts?



Rachel is not undermining America's leaders.

Conan71

#36
October 06, 2009, 01:23:05 PM
Quote from: FOTD on October 06, 2009, 12:02:31 PM
She's much more credible than your sources. And she's got a journalism background.

Don't attack me just because Rachel Maddow comes up with the truthful real news stories instead of hate monger inept foreign owned tv entertainment tyranny. You're just upset over the  lack of power thingy, CoCo puff.

Here, Rachel calling out Inhofe on rouge foreign power....he's a traitor. You will not find this in any Oklahoma News Agencies!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/vp/33185390#33185390
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/33185390#33185390

The republicans are nothing less than anarchists and are doing everything in their small squaller of power to stab our leader in the back. Incredible you would go after the credible journalists. Please tell us, where and when did Rachel Maddow misrepresent the facts?



Rachel is not undermining America's leaders.

Maddow goes after tabloid political journalism.  "Christian Mafia"?  "C-Street Gang"?

Real credible stuff there, Puff The Magic Dragon.
"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan

FOTD

#37
October 06, 2009, 02:25:03 PM
Quote from: Conan71 on October 06, 2009, 01:23:05 PM
Maddow goes after tabloid political journalism.  "Christian Mafia"?  "C-Street Gang"?

Real credible stuff there, Puff The Magic Dragon.

They are....why do you refuse to acknowledge the truth?

jamesrage

#38
October 06, 2009, 02:35:06 PM
Quote from: Hoss on October 05, 2009, 08:23:20 AM
Wow, that's rich.

How about 'birthers'?  That's the pinnacle of desparation right there.

And before Obama is was "Bush lied for oil","Bush lied to get us in Iraq", "Bush went Awol", "Bush stole the elections", "Bush is a dictator", "Bush is a idiot", "Bush masterminded 9-11" or had something to do with it" or some other conspiracy nut loons. Boths sides have their loons.
___________________________________________________________________________
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those

jamesrage

#39
October 06, 2009, 02:39:35 PM Last Edit: October 06, 2009, 02:52:15 PM by jamesrage
Quote from: FOTD on October 05, 2009, 12:45:15 PM
Rager! You got it! Maddow blasts TulsaWorld!




Mr. Coburn our Deacon, holier than thou, Senaturd brokers cheaper payoff rates for Senaturds to their misstress' families...and then lies about it....Coburns a lying prick. CoCo, quit defending the indefensible....





  Maddow is a left wing koolaid drinking loon running around trying to claim opposition to Obama is based on racism, not because they oppose Obama politically. I wonder how anyone with a brain can take her serious.
___________________________________________________________________________
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those

Conan71

#40
October 06, 2009, 02:42:46 PM
Quote from: FOTD on October 06, 2009, 02:25:03 PM
They are....why do you refuse to acknowledge the truth?

Our administration and Congress are racking up massive, massive deficits with huge paybacks to campaign donors and supporters and people like Maddow are worried about some Christian legislators?  Give me a bucking break!  Talk about obfuscating to get our eyes off the man behind the curtain.
"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan

FOTD

#41
October 06, 2009, 02:47:33 PM
Quote from: Conan71 on October 06, 2009, 02:42:46 PM
Our administration and Congress are racking up massive, massive deficits with huge paybacks to campaign donors and supporters and people like Maddow are worried about some Christian legislators?  Give me a frakking break!  Talk about obfuscating to get our eyes off the man behind the curtain.

Print more money...it's the only way out of the trickley downer syndrome we are in.....

Who gives a rats a$$ about deficits....CoCo, you need to worry about the unemployeds.

Conan71

#42
October 06, 2009, 03:00:47 PM
Quote from: FOTD on October 06, 2009, 02:47:33 PM
Print more money...it's the only way out of the trickley downer syndrome we are in.....

Who gives a rats a$$ about deficits....CoCo, you need to worry about the unemployeds.

What's unemployment got to do with a bunch of Christian Senators?  Yet another example of a real issue which is being buried by tabloid political journalism.

"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan

FOTD

#43
October 06, 2009, 05:54:19 PM Last Edit: October 06, 2009, 05:59:45 PM by FOTD
Quote from: Conan71 on October 06, 2009, 03:00:47 PM
What's unemployment got to do with a bunch of Christian Senators?  Yet another example of a real issue which is being buried by tabloid political journalism.



You really don't understand that these "family value" politicians use that positioning to represent the corporations...and not the people who gave them their power. The unemployed and underclass sure aren't represnted by the christian mafia nor the c streeters....that's for sure. But they carry the banner for anti government measures through reducing the deficits they created in the first place. Funny how their policies always place the company before the people.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3 4 5
User actions