News:

Long overdue maintenance happening. See post in the top forum.

Main Menu

I am Iron Man !

Started by DolfanBob, April 29, 2010, 11:58:39 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

DolfanBob

Just bought my Iron Man 2 IMAX 3-D tickets.
Are any of you guys or gals going to see this one ?
If so are you going to see it 2-D or 3-D ?
Changing opinions one mistake at a time.

custosnox

Quote from: DolfanBob on April 29, 2010, 11:58:39 AM
Just bought my Iron Man 2 IMAX 3-D tickets.
Are any of you guys or gals going to see this one ?
If so are you going to see it 2-D or 3-D ?

Oh, wait, what? This is going to be in IMAX 3D?  I never noticed an advertisment on that.  Okay, change of plans... now where did I put that stack of money?

sgrizzle

I recently heard some information on the big 3-D movie boom. Bue to the $12+ ticket price there is a big push for studio to put movies out in 3-D. However, many times you get duped by "not real 3-d"

Avatar was filmed in 3-D meaning every live action shot was filmed with two cameras and every CG shot was rendered from two different angles. Other films like Clash of the Titans and Iron Man are "converted to 3-d" which means that they are not the same quality. The process, in layman's terms, involves using video editing tools to "cut out around" the foreground objects (Robert Downey Jr for example) and then shifting him slightly to one side to create the image your other eye sees. Alice in Wonderland was partially filmed in 2-D which I guess makes it only half cheating.

I plan on only paying the big money for things filmed in 3-D, not in pretend ones.

So while I'm hyped for Iron Man 2, regular screen for me I guess.
(P.S. Stay until after the credits to see a very important handtool)

custosnox

Quote from: sgrizzle on April 29, 2010, 12:59:45 PM
I recently heard some information on the big 3-D movie boom. Bue to the $12+ ticket price there is a big push for studio to put movies out in 3-D. However, many times you get duped by "not real 3-d"

Avatar was filmed in 3-D meaning every live action shot was filmed with two cameras and every CG shot was rendered from two different angles. Other films like Clash of the Titans and Iron Man are "converted to 3-d" which means that they are not the same quality. The process, in layman's terms, involves using video editing tools to "cut out around" the foreground objects (Robert Downey Jr for example) and then shifting him slightly to one side to create the image your other eye sees. Alice in Wonderland was partially filmed in 2-D which I guess makes it only half cheating.

I plan on only paying the big money for things filmed in 3-D, not in pretend ones.

So while I'm hyped for Iron Man 2, regular screen for me I guess.
(P.S. Stay until after the credits to see a very important handtool)

I don't even see a 3-d option for this one.  I had momentarily forgotten about the conversion stuff going on in my excitement.  I watched How to Train a Dragon in 3D (Not IMAX) and thought it was great.  I won't be seeing this that way, since it apparantly really reduces the experiance when it is converted. 

I am taking my son to see this as a belated birthday present (only three months late but he thinks it's worth the wait).  Thanks for the after credit tip, I'm not sure if I woudl have thought to stay with as little as I go to the theater anymore.  Since caps shield was in the first, I'm going to guess that this one has to be of godly porportions.

DolfanBob

Thanks for the info sgrizzle. At the IMAX Tulsa web site they are doing the advanced ticket sales, and you can get 2-D tickets and also 3-D tickets.
You may be right about this being a movie converted to 3-D because the ticket price is 11 dollars as compared to the rate increase to 13 dollars after Avatar.
I still want to see this as big a screen as I can get.
Changing opinions one mistake at a time.

sgrizzle

#5
Quote from: custosnox on April 29, 2010, 01:05:04 PM
Thanks for the after credit tip, I'm not sure if I woudl have thought to stay with as little as I go to the theater anymore.  Since caps shield was in the first, I'm going to guess that this one has to be of godly porportions.

Actually Nick Fury was the after credits scene on Iron Man 1. The shield was in there though. Captain America also appeared in the Hulk movie, but the scene was cut. And of course the fate of Professor Xavier after the credits in X-Men 3.

You are correct on the new one though, sir.

custosnox

Quote from: sgrizzle on April 29, 2010, 02:11:47 PM
Actually Nick Fury was the after credits scene on Iron Man 1. The shield was in there though. Captain America also appeared in the Hulk movie, but the scene was cut. And of course the fate of Professor Xavier after the credits in X-Men 3.

You are correct on the new one though, sir.

Yeah, didn't mean for it to come across as the shield being after the credits.  And yeah, I went out and bought the hulk movie so that I could find the scene, and, of course, the only hulk movie out when I got mine did not have deleted scenes.  It took me a few times of watching X3 before seeing the after the credit part.

godboko71

I liked Iron Man, not sure I will see Iron Man to in theaters though still on the fence. Its been awhile since I have been to our Imax, do we have the real imax or the crapped down version?
Thank you,
Robert Town

custosnox

Quote from: godboko71 on April 29, 2010, 03:23:22 PM
I liked Iron Man, not sure I will see Iron Man to in theaters though still on the fence. Its been awhile since I have been to our Imax, do we have the real imax or the crapped down version?

I can't imagine what we have as being a crapped down version.  I've never been to another one, but I'm pretty sure this is the real deal

sgrizzle

Quote from: godboko71 on April 29, 2010, 03:23:22 PM
I liked Iron Man, not sure I will see Iron Man to in theaters though still on the fence. Its been awhile since I have been to our Imax, do we have the real imax or the crapped down version?

There is no such thing as a "crapped down version" If it doesn't meet IMAX specs, you're not allowed to sue the name.

I think our screen is something like 35' x 50'

swake

Quote from: sgrizzle on April 29, 2010, 08:56:34 PM
There is no such thing as a "crapped down version" If it doesn't meet IMAX specs, you're not allowed to sue the name.

I think our screen is something like 35' x 50'

No, there is a crapped down version. IMAX has let AMC install IMAX projectors in existing theaters without the large format screen.

It's what they have in OKC. Cinemark's theater here is the real deal.


http://azizisbored.tumblr.com/post/106587114/reblog-the-love-out-of-this-warning-amc-theaters-are


sgrizzle

Quote from: swake on April 30, 2010, 09:25:39 AM
No, there is a crapped down version. IMAX has let AMC install IMAX projectors in existing theaters without the large format screen.

It's what they have in OKC. Cinemark's theater here is the real deal.


http://azizisbored.tumblr.com/post/106587114/reblog-the-love-out-of-this-warning-amc-theaters-are



Found a link listing ours as 53' x 75'

Nice to know IMAX completely sold out.

DolfanBob

Has anyone beat me to seeing it yet ?
One reviewer gives it 2 1/2 out of 4 stars.
Changing opinions one mistake at a time.

Rico

I have seen "Iron Man"




Only in Virtual Reality form.. Birmingham AL.

custosnox

I'll be going Sunday.  Lastnight they were having a double header with IronMan 1 showing, then right aftewards, at midnight, they were showing IronMan2