Libya

[Conan71]

I do not deny going after some folks in here. What gets me is the unwillingness of others going after their own because of ideology/love fest/group grope.

[guido911]

I was reading a bit on Obama's speech last night and came across (no Beavis/Butthead laugh) this article from the AP which provides an angle I had not considered re: handing control of the Libya mission to NATO.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42314188/ns/politics-white_house/

[nathanm]

I do not deny going after some folks in here. What gets me is the unwillingness of others going after their own because of ideology/love fest.

I don't know about you, but if I commented on every single bit of what I see as stupid or illogical thinking on this forum, there wouldn't be enough hours in the day. Sometimes you gotta pick your battles. I try to keep to my policy of joining in any circle jerks regardless of party affiliation, thanks.

[guido911]

Yes, guido, your complaints about other posters are righteous and moral. A shining beacon, not unlike the bat signal, to your fellow travelers. But when other people comment about your behavior, that's a baaaad, baaaad thing. You're being silenced! Silenced, I say!

Fight the man, brother!

All right Nate, you asked for it:

[nathanm]

All right Nate, you asked for it:

I'M MEEEELLLLLTTTTTIIIIINNNGGGGG!!!!1!!!one

_{Can we please reorder the days of the week now?}

[Townsend]

Hey T, was it you that got all wee wee'd up and bolted from this forum a while back? I cannot remember.

Got tired of listening to your personal attacks.

I got over it.

Sounds like you've put on your skirt and can't handle any disagreements.

[Cats Cats Cats]

Got tired of listening to your personal attacks.

I got over it.

Sounds like you've put on your skirt and can't handle any disagreements.

Townsend we don't need these sexist remarks on the board.  His wife makes more money than him.

[Townsend]

Townsend we don't need these sexist remarks on the board.  His wife makes more money than him.

Bygones

[Gaspar]

I was reading a bit on Obama's speech last night and came across (no Beavis/Butthead laugh) this article from the AP which provides an angle I had not considered re: handing control of the Libya mission to NATO.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42314188/ns/politics-white_house/

It's called "Spinning Hats."  

On Wednesday the mission will be turned over to a Canadian three-star general, Charles Bouchard.  Bouchard will answer to Admiral Locklear, United States Navy, and Supreme NATO Commander Admiral James G. Stavridis, United States Navy, both of whom answer to President Obama as their Commander in Chief.  

We are still in charge, but we get to spread around the blame for anything that goes wrong.  

[Conan71]

We are still in charge, but we get to spread around the blame for anything that goes wrong.  

President Bush should have been that smart.

[guido911]

Got tired of listening to your personal attacks.

I got over it.

Sounds like you've put on your skirt and can't handle any disagreements.

That's rich. You tuck tail and run from this forum and you got the nads to accuse me of wearing a skirt?

[Gaspar]

President Bush should have been that smart.

He wasn't.

[Gaspar]

That's rich. You tuck tail and run from this forum and you got the nads to accuse me of wearing a skirt?

I think you would look absolutely dashing in a skirt. 

[Conan71]

I think you would look absolutely dashing in a skirt. 

Better than a Rottweiler?

[Gaspar]

Better than a Rottweiler?

At least as good!