State Government at it again - Evolution

[RecycleMichael]

What do you have against apes?

You sir, are Apist.  I won't justify any further response to a man like you.

[Conan71]

Now he's just screwing with you Michael

Good one Shadows!

[shadows]

What do you have against apes?

You sir, are Apist.  I won't justify any further response to a man like you.

......
I do not have a vendetta against the hairless ape.  I see them, hear them, read their comment, analyze their opinion and try to arrive at a equable conclusion. 

[TheArtist]

    Apparently Shadows does live in some other "reality" or world that I have neither seen nor heard of.   What are these "hairless apes" he speaks of?  Sometimes I have heard the ill informed say that Darwin said, man evolved from apes.  He never did.  He said that man and apes evolved from a common ancestor.  One must wonder about the veracity of someones arguments on a subject when they can't even seem to get the most basic tenets right.

[shadows]

   Apparently Shadows does live in some other "reality" or world that I have neither seen nor heard of.   What are these "hairless apes" he speaks of?  Sometimes I have heard the ill informed say that Darwin said, man evolved from apes.  He never did.  He said that man and apes evolved from a common ancestor.  One must wonder about the veracity of someones arguments on a subject when they can't even seem to get the most basic tenets right.

Check "Darwin, The Descent of Man, and Human Evolution"

[Townsend]

Check "Darwin, The Descent of Man, and Human Evolution"

That's an article written by someone other than Darwin.

[TheArtist]

  Thomas Huxley posited that "man descended from apes" or "evolved from within apes"   Darwin did not, and did not write that in "The Descent of Man" either.  

[shadows]

That's an article written by someone other than Darwin.

..
True; it points out Darwin's did associate evolution of man from the ape and the loss of hair first by the female.   Read the whole article. 

The question in debate is "should such a scientific proven study be taught in public schools when the church believes there is merit in it".

[Townsend]

..
True; it points out Darwin's did associate evolution of man from the ape and the loss of hair first by the female.   Read the whole article. 

The question in debate is "should such a scientific proven study be taught in public schools when the church believes there is merit in it".

You must be reading a different article than I did.

Please post a link to the article.

[TheArtist]

..
True; it points out Darwin's did associate evolution of man from the ape and the loss of hair first by the female.   Read the whole article. 

The question in debate is "should such a scientific proven study be taught in public schools when the church believes there is merit in it".

What study?

Why should it matter what the group is, church or not?  Is belief and simple merit all thats required? We would have an infinity of "items" to teach if that were the standard.

[shadows]

You must be reading a different article than I did.

Please post a link to the article.

.,,
Click in your search engine “Darwin’s Theory” and you can follow it with at least six hours of reading.

[Townsend]

.
Click in your search engine "Darwin's Theory" and you can follow it with at least six hours of reading.

I'd like to see the article you've got though.  Which one, specifically, are you reading to post that Darwin stated what you say he stated?

[shadows]

I'd like to see the article you've got though.  Which one, specifically, are you reading to post that Darwin stated what you say he stated?

..
Among the white pages that have been written (1,770,000 articles published with a large percentage published on internet) it is beyond the capacity of the human mind to remember which one's but I think it was by the search engine that selected the articles.

If you read them you will arrive at the conclusion that the ape involved from man who grew hair over his body as he moved out of Africa to the colder climates.

On the question Darwin's Theory created by years of world studdies would it not be proper to call it a study?

     

[Red Arrow]

If you read them you will arrive at the conclusion that the ape involved from man who grew hair over his body as he moved out of Africa to the colder climates.

Which totally explains why the hairy apes are mostly found in Africa (warm) and naked apes are found in colder climates.  The mankind that grew hair stayed in the colder climates lost most of their hair and had to rely on clothes and cultivate food while the hairy apes moved back to Africa and dined on easy to get food.  I'm not sure which was more intelligent.

[shadows]

Which totally explains why the hairy apes are mostly found in Africa (warm) and naked apes are found in colder climates.  The mankind that grew hair stayed in the colder climates lost most of their hair and had to rely on clothes and cultivate food while the hairy apes moved back to Africa and dined on easy to get food.  I'm not sure which was more intelligent.

...


You got it right man.  I stood on the remains of the ice age under the volcano ash  at Brants (?) NM.  I am sure if one reads Africa  history they have had an ice age also.  Evolution spans centuries.   If we are confused just think how confused the ape is having to re-grow hair to evolve.