Infidels

[erfalf]

You've shown true talent for this.

I learn from the best. 

[nathanm]

Show me evidence that the Whitehouse made that claim. 

I already referenced the Washington Post. Google News is over there.

[Gaspar]

I already referenced the Washington Post. Google News is over there.

There is not a single report, interview, or broadcast from last week to the effect that the Administration suspected this was a planned terrorist attack.

Not one.

[nathanm]

There is not a single report, interview, or broadcast from last week to the effect that the Administration suspected this was a planned terrorist attack.

Not one.

You are either misinformed or lying.

[Townsend]

There is not a single report, interview, or broadcast from last week to the effect that the Administration suspected this was a planned terrorist attack.

Not one.

You guys think this fits under rule 38?  199?

[Gaspar]

You are either misinformed or lying.

I posted the links.  I will eat crow if you can post a link confirming the contrary.

At this point I'm probably just straining my finger joints, huh?

[nathanm]

I posted the links.  I will eat crow if you can post a link confirming the contrary.

I already led you to water. Do you want me to drink for you, too? Using simple search terms on Google News and using the date range feature, it took about 30 seconds to find that which you seek. I'll give you a chance to look for yourself and retract your statement.

[erfalf]

I believe the official position on the matter changed only yesterday. I could be wrong. But I also know plenty in the administration including Obama himself were still towing the video line as of yesterday.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/benghazi-attack-called-terrorist/2012/09/19/90e74b52-0290-11e2-9b24-ff730c7f6312_story.html

[nathanm]

I believe the official position on the matter changed only yesterday.

That's completely irrelevant. Gaspar claimed that "[t]here is not a single report, interview, or broadcast from last week to the effect that the Administration suspected this was a planned terrorist attack." That is factually incorrect, and all it would have taken to disabuse himself of that notion was about 30 seconds on the Googles.

[erfalf]

That's completely irrelevant. Gaspar claimed that "[t]here is not a single report, interview, or broadcast from last week to the effect that the Administration suspected this was a planned terrorist attack." That is factually incorrect, and all it would have taken to disabuse himself of that notion was about 30 seconds on the Googles.

I think the times said spacifically that

for the first time Wednesday acknowledged that last week's assault on the U.S. Consulate in Libya was a "terrorist attack,"

How does that contradict Gas?

[Gaspar]

I think the times said spacifically that
How does that contradict Gas?

erfalf, at this point you are wasting time.  Nate is playing parce and quip.  It'll go on all day.

[nathanm]

How does that contradict Gas?

It doesn't. Of course, I didn't say it did, so I'm not sure what your point is. My point is that Gaspar is choosing to ignore reality in favor of some incoherent right wing narrative that's completely irrelevant anyway.

[nathanm]

Nate is playing parce and quip.

First off, the word is parse. Secondly, I'm not playing anything. This is serious business. If people believe and continue to repeat lies we can't have a rational and coherent discussion about where our country is, where it's headed, and what we can do about it. You may not see that as something worth doing, but I do. So keep deflecting from the fact you said something that is factually untrue if you feel you must, that's not even the point, so long as you stop repeating the lie.

[erfalf]

First off, the word is parse. Secondly, I'm not playing anything. This is serious business. If people believe and continue to repeat lies we can't have a rational and coherent discussion about where our country is, where it's headed, and what we can do about it. You may not see that as something worth doing, but I do. So keep deflecting from the fact you said something that is factually untrue if you feel you must, that's not even the point, so long as you stop repeating the lie.

I'm all turned around. What did Gas lie or mis-represent?

[Conan71]

First off, the word is parse. Secondly, I'm not playing anything. This is serious business. If people believe and continue to repeat lies we can't have a rational and coherent discussion about where our country is, where it's headed, and what we can do about it. You may not see that as something worth doing, but I do. So keep deflecting from the fact you said something that is factually untrue if you feel you must, that's not even the point, so long as you stop repeating the lie.

Then just post a damn link to prove your point instead of playing internet bully.