Infidels

[Townsend]

Susan Rice is out.

CNBC tweet:  Ambassador Susan Rice withdraws name from consideration for U.S. Secretary of State.

Edited to add:

EXCLUSIVE: Susan Rice drops out of running for secretary of state; Saddened by partisan politics

http://rockcenter.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12/13/15888883-exclusive-susan-rice-drops-out-of-running-for-secretary-of-state-saddened-by-partisan-politics?chromedomain=nbcpolitics

Embattled U.N. envoy Susan Rice is dropping out of the running to be the next secretary of state after months of criticism over her Benghazi comments, she told NBC News on Thursday.

"If nominated, I am now convinced that the confirmation process would be lengthy, disruptive and costly – to you and to our most pressing national and international priorities," Rice wrote in a letter to President Obama, saying she's saddened by the partisan politics surrounding her prospects.

"That trade-off is simply not worth it to our country...Therefore, I respectfully request that you no longer consider my candidacy at this time," she wrote in the letter obtained by NBC News.

Brian Williams will have an exclusive interview with Rice on tonight's "Rock Center With Brian Williams" at 10p/9c.

Rice had been viewed as one of the front-runners to replace Hillary Clinton as the nation's top foreign policy official.

She has been under intense fire from Republicans for initially characterizing the Sept. 11 assault on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, as a spur-of-the-moment response to a crude anti-Muslim film.

"What happened in Benghazi was in fact initially a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired hours before in Cairo, almost a copycat of the demonstrations against our facility in Cairo, which were prompted, of course, by the video," Rice said on NBC's "Meet the Press" five days after the attack.

"Opportunistic extremist elements came to the consulate as this was unfolding. They came with heavy weapons, which unfortunately are readily available in post-revolutionary Libya, and it escalated into a much more violent episode."

As more details emerged suggesting it was a premeditated terrorist action, GOP critics accused Rice of misleading the public at the height of the presidential campaign.

She countered that she went with the best information available about the attack, in which Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed.

"I relied solely and squarely on the information provided to me by the intelligence community. I made clear that the information was preliminary and that our investigations would give us the definitive answers," she said on Nov. 21 at the United Nations.

By then, Obama had already expressed strong support for Rice, warning Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.) to stop slamming her and vowing to block her confirmation.

"They should go after me," he said at his first press conference after his re-election.

And last week, Clinton praised Rice as a "stalwart colleague" who had done a "good job" at the U.N.

Despite a series of closed-door meeting with Capitol Hill lawmakers to drum up support, Rice continued to face questions from senators key to her confirmation.

After a Nov. 28 sitdown with Rice, Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) said she couldn't yet endorse the veteran diplomat and raised a new point of concern: her role in protecting American embassies in Kenya and Nairobi that were bombed by terrorists in 1998.

Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) suggested Rice was seen as too much of an Obama loyalist and the GOP preferred "someone of independence."

In her letter to Obama, Rice took aim at her GOP critics.

"The position of secretary of state should never be politicized," she wrote, adding, "I'm saddened that we have reached this point, even before you have decided whom to nominate. We cannot afford such an irresponsible distraction from the most pressing issues facing the American people."

Her withdrawal leaves Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) as a possible candidate for the job, and Republicans have said he would have a smoother run.

"I think John Kerry would be an excellent appointment and would be easily confirmed by his colleagues," Collins said last month.

Rice, 48, has been the United States' permanent representative to the United Nations since 2009, after serving as a senior advisor to the Obama campaign , working at the Brookings Institution and holding other diplomatic and national security positions dating back to 19

It cut off at the end.

[Teatownclown]

Red Herring.... Sacrificial lamb?

[Conan71]

Red Herring.... Sacrificial lamb?

No, she just needs to HTFU.  Since when has partisan politics not been a part of presidential appointments.

[Gaspar]

Red Herring.... Sacrificial lamb?

Exactly!  It's been John Kerry all along.  President Obama needs someone with the right metal.

. . . or at least willing to throw the right medals.

[Gaspar]

We're sending troops to Turkey now, and sending 3,000 back to Iraq.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/14/world/meast/syria-civil-war/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/12/09/277127/3000-us-troops-secretly-return-to-iraq/

[guido911]

Anything to avoid testifying on Benghazi...

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_CLINTON?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-12-15-12-28-49

[heironymouspasparagus]

We're sending troops to Turkey now, and sending 3,000 back to Iraq.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/14/world/meast/syria-civil-war/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/12/09/277127/3000-us-troops-secretly-return-to-iraq/

Just loving it, aren't you.  Wrong thing to do 10 years ago, wrong thing to do now.  Fits perfectly with your RWRE (MurdochRoveBush) guy's world view.  Wonder how many more of our kids are gonna get killed this go round?

[Teatownclown]

[heironymouspasparagus]

Have we forgotten the 900,000 innocent civilians killed in Iraq during the US intervention??  How many children were in that sum?

[Gaspar]

What a disgusting way to be political!

[Gaspar]

Over a year later, MSNBC decides to start covering Benghazi and demands answers!

Somebody needs to ask Chris Matthews, what difference it makes?

[heironymouspasparagus]

Over a year later, MSNBC decides to start covering Benghazi and demands answers!


Somebody needs to ask Chris Matthews, what difference it makes?

Maybe in a few more years, they and Fox will start to demand answers about the 30+ killed at embassies during Bush's regime....

No?...I thought not...

[Hoss]

Maybe in a few more years, they and Fox will start to demand answers about the 30+ killed at embassies during Bush's regime....

No?...I thought not...

The silence is deafening, isn't it.

[Gaspar]

Maybe in a few more years, they and Fox will start to demand answers about the 30+ killed at embassies during Bush's regime....

No?...I thought not...

Yes, and i'm sure those uncoordinated individual attacks were also blamed on an internet video so that president Bush could attend a campaign fundraising event in Vegas the next day without looking bad for abandoning his post in the midst of a terrorist attack on 9/11.  Exactly the same!

Also funny, how we can blow up a goat herder and his family in a remote mountain region of Afghanistan for terrorist "ties", but we can't arrest the terrorists who attacked our embassy on video tape, and who's names and whereabouts we have intimate knowledge of.  That's the questions that folks like Chris Matthews are just now beginning to ask.  The administration cannot suppress the truth forever, especially when their own media myrmidons begin to feel betrayed.

I'm willing to bet we had an arms operation out of that embassy, and if that had come to light, the international implications would have created significant obstacles in an election year.     Instead, they were reduced to bumps in the road.

[heironymouspasparagus]

Yes, and i'm sure those uncoordinated individual attacks were also blamed on an internet video so that president Bush could attend a campaign fundraising event in Vegas the next day without looking bad for abandoning his post in the midst of a terrorist attack on 9/11.  Exactly the same!

Also funny, how we can blow up a goat herder and his family in a remote mountain region of Afghanistan for terrorist "ties", but we can't arrest the terrorists who attacked our embassy on video tape, and who's names and whereabouts we have intimate knowledge of.  That's the questions that folks like Chris Matthews are just now beginning to ask.  The administration cannot suppress the truth forever, especially when their own media myrmidons begin to feel betrayed.

I'm willing to bet we had an arms operation out of that embassy, and if that had come to light, the international implications would have created significant obstacles in an election year.     Instead, they were reduced to bumps in the road.

So the silence is quite all right with you, then... Much better, you're right!  Even you can't really be so delusional as to believe your own propaganda....uncoordinated individuals...right....that's all any of these activities have been.  Uncoordinated individuals.  There is no worldwide terrorist agenda.  These are not the droids you are looking for...

Not completely sure, but weren't you one of the supporters of the Libyan Imperialistic Voyeuristic Adventure?  That effort we made to take out the stable, if distasteful existing regime...and replace them with the people from eastern Libya who have been leaving the country for years to head east so they could go kill our kids in Iraq and Afghanistan??

It is a whole like walking up to a mad dog, messing with it in some fashion, and then expressing surprise, if not downright dismay when it bites you.  Makes one wonder who the real "mad" being is....