Democrat Party Seems Divided

[guido911]

Democrats fall in love with their candidates and republicans fall in line with theirs.

[Emphasis]. Is anyone else kinda creeped out by this?

[TheArtist]

[Emphasis]. Is anyone else kinda creeped out by this?

I am creeped out by both.  And also creeped out by anyone else who isn't creeped out by both lol.

[AquaMan]

I'm creeped out by people who use the words Democrat Party instead of the Democratic Party. They don't refer to Republicans as the Republic Party. Its a hangover froma respect for a former president who didn't speak the language too well.

[RecycleMichael]

[Emphasis]. Is anyone else kinda creeped out by this?

That is my point. We shouldn't worship politicians nor should we automatically support every stance they take.

Equally, we shouldn't expect a candidate for office support each stance their party takes.

[guido911]

Axelrod vs. Hillary?

http://hotair.com/archives/2014/08/12/axelrod-hits-back-at-hillary-when-we-say-dont-do-stupid-stuff-we-mean-stuff-like-occupying-iraq/

[Townsend]

Axelrod vs. Hillary?

http://hotair.com/archives/2014/08/12/axelrod-hits-back-at-hillary-when-we-say-dont-do-stupid-stuff-we-mean-stuff-like-occupying-iraq/

Go ahead everybody...click it

[AquaMan]

Boring smile. That's doesn't make much of a case for division in the party, just politics intruding into common sense conversation, but I think when you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail, and of course we all want to be the hammer, not the nail.

[guido911]

I'm trying to find a Daily Kos or Think Progress link criticizing Obama or showing division. But gee, for some reason there isn't one. I wonder why? Anyway, here is more Hillary v. Obama.

The former secretary of state, and probable candidate for president, outlines her foreign-policy doctrine. She says this about President Obama's: "Great nations need organizing principles, and 'Don't do stupid stuff' is not an organizing principle."

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/08/hillary-clinton-failure-to-help-syrian-rebels-led-to-the-rise-of-isis/375832/

[Hoss]

I'm trying to find a Daily Kos or Think Progress link criticizing Obama or showing division. But gee, for some reason there isn't one. I wonder why? Anyway, here is more Hillary v. Obama.


http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/08/hillary-clinton-failure-to-help-syrian-rebels-led-to-the-rise-of-isis/375832/

Maybe the same reason Fox News didn't really report on the final outcome of the Benghazi 'scandal'?

[AquaMan]

Conspiracies no doubt. No one dares criticize a sitting president, right?

[guido911]

Conspiracies no doubt. No one dares criticize a sitting president, right?

Better not criticize this president. It's racist, and you would be just beggin' for an audit.

[RecycleMichael]

I'm trying to find a Daily Kos or Think Progress link

Glad to see you have expanded your horizons. Keep reading. You can change.

[AquaMan]

Better not criticize this president. It's racist, and you would be just beggin' for an audit.

Hmm. Just like criticizing the last president during conflict was what......unpatriotic and may lead to getting on the no fly list. So, those who criticize are either unpatriotic or racist. Got it.

[heironymouspasparagus]

Better not criticize this president. It's racist, and you would be just beggin' for an audit.

It's not the criticism that is racist - it's all the other stuff going on around that IS racist.

[Red Arrow]

Hmm. Just like criticizing the last president during conflict was what......unpatriotic and may lead to getting on the no fly list. So, those who criticize are either unpatriotic or racist. Got it.

It's about time you "got it".

After 2016 it will be sexist.