Obama Celebrates 160th Round of Golf

[RecycleMichael]

I love how guido posts from a blogger and you guys all believe it.

[guido911]

I love how guido posts from a blogger and you guys all believe it.

Here is other links to help undo RM's knotted knickers...

http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2011/12/17/carney-dodges-questions-michelles-hawaii-flight/

http://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/194549-michelle-obama-crashes-at-oprahs-hawaii-pad

If you have something to the contrary, post it, although it is hardly THAT important. I will continue to laugh at the hypocrisy of ol Barry blasting away at the thoughtlessness of some about the poor while he and Moochelle party it up in Hawaii. I mean, I know that is okay with you, but it's still laughably hypocritical.

[RecycleMichael]

You seem obsessed with Michele Obama's schedule.

You obviously Googled and learned that she crashed at Oprah's place when her husband had to get back to work.

Please explain how you posting about this doesn't make you look creepy.

[Hoss]

You seem obsessed with Michele Obama's schedule.

You obviously Googled and learned that she crashed at Oprah's place when her husband had to get back to work.

Please explain how you posting about this doesn't make you look creepy.

He doesn't really have to post like that to appear creepy.  It just kinda happens for him.

[guido911]

You seem obsessed with Michele Obama's schedule.

You obviously Googled and learned that she crashed at Oprah's place when her husband had to get back to work.

Please explain how you posting about this doesn't make you look creepy.

Well, uh, I guess since it was, uh, important enough to get asked about at a presser today, uhh. I guess that's why. And apparently it means something since you are all wet about it. And Hoss joined in. Now THAT's not creepy at all.

[RecycleMichael]

So if a single member of the press asks a single question, you think it is your duty to post about it?

Your sense of responsibility just dwarfs reality.

Tell me again why you are obsessed with this first lady? Did you track the press questions of other wives of presidents? Were you following Nancy Reagan when she was getting political advice from an astrologer?

[guido911]

I can't believe the National Excrement hasn't picked up on that story yet: "Despondent Michelle, hungry for affection, turns to pool boy in Hawaii!"

Something close.

http://downtrend.com/jrc410/not-only-are-conservatives-fed-upwith-obama-new-report-indicates-michelle-wants-divorce/

[Conan71]

Something close.

http://downtrend.com/jrc410/not-only-are-conservatives-fed-upwith-obama-new-report-indicates-michelle-wants-divorce/

Hah hah!  MC and I were at the store this afternoon, I saw that cover and she couldn't figure out why there was a yellow stream running out of the legs of my capris as I snickered uncontrollably.

[guido911]

Hah hah!  MC and I were at the store this afternoon, I saw that cover and she couldn't figure out why there was a yellow stream running out of the legs of my capris as I snickered uncontrollably.

Uh-Oh

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/rumours-of-marriage-problems-threaten-to-overshadow-michelle-obamas-50th-birthday/story-fnb64oi6-1226800021887#

This is how BJ Clinton getting a Lewinski began...

[guido911]

Hmmm.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2541580/Is-Obama-marriage-rocks-Ugly-fights-selfie-Even-Presidential-affair-Astonishing-claims-emerge.html

[RecycleMichael]

Hmmm.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2541580/Is-Obama-marriage-rocks-Ugly-fights-selfie-Even-Presidential-affair-Astonishing-claims-emerge.html

You constantly attack "news sources" that others cite on this forum. If you ever do it again, it will prove you to be a hypocrite.

From your "source" page on wikipedia..."the editorial stance of which broadly reflects that of the Daily Mail, being to the right wing of mainstream British politics and typically supporting the UK Conservative Party.[8] MailOnline articles tend to be dominated by pictures rather than long-form journalism.[2] A major component of the website is its entertainment news, often featuring celebrities such as Kim Kardashian[9] or members of the British Royal Family such as the Duchess of Cambridge.[10] It is estimated that 25% of the traffic received by the website is purely to access the entertainment and gossip stories.[11]

The reporter who wrote this story...the story he wrote three days before this was how Amazon is assembling an army of robots. 

First you quote a blogger about this "story" then to backup your obsession with the personal life of Michelle Obama, you posted that.

You need forget her. She doesn't know you exist.

[guido911]

You constantly attack "news sources" that others cite on this forum. If you ever do it again, it will prove you to be a hypocrite.

From your "source" page on wikipedia..."the editorial stance of which broadly reflects that of the Daily Mail, being to the right wing of mainstream British politics and typically supporting the UK Conservative Party.[8] MailOnline articles tend to be dominated by pictures rather than long-form journalism.[2] A major component of the website is its entertainment news, often featuring celebrities such as Kim Kardashian[9] or members of the British Royal Family such as the Duchess of Cambridge.[10] It is estimated that 25% of the traffic received by the website is purely to access the entertainment and gossip stories.[11]

The reporter who wrote this story...the story he wrote three days before this was how Amazon is assembling an army of robots. 

First you quote a blogger about this "story" then to backup your obsession with the personal life of Michelle Obama, you posted that.

You need forget her. She doesn't know you exist.

Unwad the panties RM, I am just having fun.

[RecycleMichael]

I am not upset in any way.

Your obsession with posting about Michelle Obama is just a little creepy. I am just trying to warn you. It is because I care. 

[dbacksfan 2.0]

Hmmm.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2541580/Is-Obama-marriage-rocks-Ugly-fights-selfie-Even-Presidential-affair-Astonishing-claims-emerge.html

So, do you use The Daily Mail as a source when preparing your briefs for court? Or do you use The Enquirer?

[guido911]

So, do you use The Daily Mail as a source when preparing your briefs for court? Or do you use The Enquirer?

Why do you ask? Think you can do a better job than me? Because that I checked this was a public internet forum and not a court room. Even still, I wonder if ol' Johnny Edwards (who is a lawyer) made such an observation like you before the Enquirer tore him a new one.

All that, OR  I could be following a line of jokes from a previous page in this thread started by another poster. Swing and a miss...