News:

Long overdue maintenance happening. See post in the top forum.

Main Menu

President Trump- The Implications

Started by Conan71, November 09, 2016, 10:24:31 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

erfalf

Quote from: Townsend on December 18, 2017, 11:54:10 AM
And then rules were past for Net Neutrality that removed the fear and we were all able to move on to something else...until now.

You are exaggerating. or misunderstanding what NN does. But whatever. NN good, no NN bad. I get it. It's just that I don't believe that the bad is 50 bazillion times worse than the reality of 2 years ago.
"Trust but Verify." - The Gipper

swake



swake

Quote from: erfalf on December 18, 2017, 02:55:25 PM
Yet they were all resolved without Net Neutrality.

Yeah, but since the ISP were trying so much shady crap, wouldn't it be good to have a clear cut set of rules that lets the ISPs clearly know what is and isn't allowed?

That was NN.

And it is now gone.

TeeDub

Hopefully we look back on network neutrality and say "whew, much ado about nothing."

In the meantime, as long as you can change providers, you have at least some recourse.

erfalf

Quote from: swake on December 18, 2017, 03:24:20 PM
Yeah, but since the ISP were trying so much shady crap, wouldn't it be good to have a clear cut set of rules that lets the ISPs clearly know what is and isn't allowed?

That was NN.

And it is now gone.


We could eliminate many traffic fatalities by having a government agent in every vehicle. That doesn't mean we should.
"Trust but Verify." - The Gipper

swake

Quote from: erfalf on December 18, 2017, 04:16:42 PM
We could eliminate many traffic fatalities by having a government agent in every vehicle. That doesn't mean we should.

Having clear and fair rules on internet content access from ISPs is equal to having a government agent in every car to enforce traffic laws?


erfalf

Quote from: swake on December 18, 2017, 04:27:04 PM
Having clear and fair rules on internet content access from ISPs is equal to having a government agent in every car to enforce traffic laws?



It means we have the tools to do what NN purports to do already. Adding another regulatory body is just busy work and unnecessary.
"Trust but Verify." - The Gipper

BKDotCom

Quote from: erfalf on December 18, 2017, 04:35:29 PM
Adding another regulatory body is just busy work and unnecessary.

The FCC already exists... "The Federal Communications Commission regulates interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and U.S. territories."

erfalf

Quote from: BKDotCom on December 18, 2017, 04:38:08 PM
The FCC already exists... "The Federal Communications Commission regulates interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and U.S. territories."

Poor choice of words. We don't need new rules, when the old ones worked just fine. Or at least they appear to work for all the hypotheticals I hear.
"Trust but Verify." - The Gipper

swake

Quote from: erfalf on December 18, 2017, 04:47:48 PM
Poor choice of words. We don't need new rules, when the old ones worked just fine. Or at least they appear to work for all the hypotheticals I hear.

The old rules did work ok, not great. But they were overturned in a court case in 2014 brought by Verizon specifically to allow those behaviors. The court said the rules were inconsistent and overturned them leading the 2015 NN rule that was just overturned. All those bad behaviors are now allowed.

heironymouspasparagus

Quote from: erfalf on December 18, 2017, 04:47:48 PM
Poor choice of words. We don't need new rules, when the old ones worked just fine. Or at least they appear to work for all the hypotheticals I hear.


Your advocacy of clogging the courts with even more lawsuits is admirable...to a lawyer.   While defined regulations won't eliminate all litigation, it was/would be reduced, leaving the court for more important things like determining whether Oklahoma laws are unconstitutional or not...lol.  Like any of them aren't.

"So he brandished a gun, never shot anyone or anything right?"  --TeeDub, 17 Feb 2018.

I don't share my thoughts because I think it will change the minds of people who think differently.  I share my thoughts to show the people who already think like me that they are not alone.

patric

Tweet first and get the facts later.

President Trump said Monday's Amtrak derailment in Washington state shows the need for increased infrastructure investments. He tweeted: "Seven trillion dollars spent in the Middle East while our roads, bridges, tunnels, railways (and more) crumble! Not for long!" But the tracks where the accident occurred were actually brand new.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/amtrak-derailment-washington-critics-warned-high-speed-route-dangerous/

Yes, the same Trump who cut AMTRAK's funding in the latest budget (as well as Obama-era safety requirements).
"Tulsa will lay off police and firemen before we will cut back on unnecessarily wasteful streetlights."  -- March 18, 2009 TulsaNow Forum

BKDotCom


heironymouspasparagus


Gonna break out a bottle of champagne tonight and celebrate another $1.5 trillion in national debt !!   And most importantly, huge tax cuts for the richest!!

But at least it wasn't Hillary...!


"So he brandished a gun, never shot anyone or anything right?"  --TeeDub, 17 Feb 2018.

I don't share my thoughts because I think it will change the minds of people who think differently.  I share my thoughts to show the people who already think like me that they are not alone.