Who Said It?

[Conan71]

Who said this?

"...Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.

I want to explain why I have decided, with the unanimous recommendation of my national security team, to use force in Iraq; why we have acted now; and what we aim to accomplish..."

"...Other countries possess weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles. With Saddam, there is one big difference: He has used them. Not once, but repeatedly. Unleashing chemical weapons against Iranian troops during a decade-long war. Not only against soldiers, but against civilians, firing Scud missiles at the citizens of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Iran. And not only against a foreign enemy, but even against his own people, gassing Kurdish civilians in Northern Iraq.

The international community had little doubt then, and I have no doubt today, that left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will use these terrible weapons again."

Who said this?

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001.

It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security."

[guido911]

But but but...Bush lied

[iplaw]

Was it possibly someone who was FOR the war before they were AGAINST it...well, that doesn't narrow it down if we're talking about a democrat.  Could it possibly be someone who saw their hopes for the Whitehouse flushed down the crapper when Rudy announced today?

No war for oil! No war for oil!  How many Lives per Gallon?

[guido911]

On the subject of Rudy:

http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/98858.aspx

[Conan71]

Not gonna say yet, waiting for more to weigh in.

[iplaw]

I still think it's mangina...

[mdunn]

Larry the cable guy????Did he say those things??

[aoxamaxoa]

In light of who is baiting us here, I will guess Hillary!

[mdunn]

Yea thats the ticket!!!!

[Conan71]

Quote 1:

William Jefferson Clinton, Dec. 1998

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html

Quote 2:

Hillary Rodham Clinton, Oct. 2002

http://clinton.senate.gov/speeches/iraq_101002.html

[aoxamaxoa]

You're so predictable.

[iplaw]

I knew Mangina was one of those quotes...she's an idiot.  You'd think she would have had enough foresight not to make those comments knowing she was going to be running for office in '08.  Waffles anyone?

[Conan71]

It just begs the question, did the Clinton administration fabricate intelligence or was he a dupe as well?

Bush had the same intelligence gathering at his disposal as Clinton.  The whole: "Bush lied" sounds pretty fallacious now doesn't it?  Had there been a Democrat in the White House and Democrats were in control of congress, I don't believe you would have been hearing "Gore lied" out of Capitol Hill.

A Democrat could have just as easily under-estimated the insurgency to follow after removing Hussein from power.  The world is a better place without Saddam, just ask the Clintons.

[iplaw]

Did anyone see that Mangina and Obama are already running from debates?  I guess they've realized that there's only so many times you can change your story in front of the American people before they realize you're a moron.



Mangina's Chicken and Waffles...

[nsugrad_05]

quote:Originally posted by Conan71

Who said this?

"...Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.

I want to explain why I have decided, with the unanimous recommendation of my national security team, to use force in Iraq; why we have acted now; and what we aim to accomplish..."

"...Other countries possess weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles. With Saddam, there is one big difference: He has used them. Not once, but repeatedly. Unleashing chemical weapons against Iranian troops during a decade-long war. Not only against soldiers, but against civilians, firing Scud missiles at the citizens of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Iran. And not only against a foreign enemy, but even against his own people, gassing Kurdish civilians in Northern Iraq.

The international community had little doubt then, and I have no doubt today, that left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will use these terrible weapons again."

Who said this?

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001.

It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security."

Nice job Conan, I see we have learned the Hannity game. Isnt that quaint. The Clintons did not get us into this mess, George Bush did. So the CLinton's had the same apparently flawed intelligence. How is this new info?