Breaking News

[altruismsuffers]

New footage released by the BBC has a reporter speaking about the collapse of WTC 7 20 minutes before it happened.  The official story says that building 7 fell unexpectedly due to raging fires which weakened the steel.  Why did BBC have prior knowledge of this "suprise" collapse?

::FULL STORY AND VIDEO HERE::



Maybe because it was not a suprise at all and it was a well planned demolition?

Learn what is really happening in your world at TulsaTruth.org

[sgrizzle]

I still tend to go with the idea that since the building suffered sever debris damage (see page 24) that the debris damages caused the collapse. It also looks to me like the building feel to the south. News crews filmed it from the north, and since it didn't fall to east or west, it would appear to fall straight down.

As to an error in reporting, I clearly remember the "middle eastern men" blowing up the federal building in OKC.

[iplaw]

Never forget....You seem to forget that I stomp you every time you bring this stuff up.  For the last time....  




GO AWAY








Moderators, please lock this thread.

[tim huntzinger]

quote:Originally posted by sgrizzle


As to an error in reporting, I clearly remember the "middle eastern men" blowing up the federal building in OKC.

The evidence is so overwhelming that Nichols and McVeigh were aided by Islamists I am glad you brought this up.  More on this thread.

The intelligence apparatus knew that something was going to happen on '911,' my belief is that they thought it was going to be a 'simple' hijacking, not a martydom op.

[iplaw]

Oh boy.


Dueling nutcases.







For the love of all that's holy, please lock this thread.....

[tim huntzinger]

Free market: do not read, do not respond.

[Conan71]

[tim huntzinger]

That is a poor response to the story.  At least ya'll are not dumping on womyn or the mentally disabled.

My response to the BBC snafu is that authoritays had already determined that seven would fall because of the damage it had sustained.  That information did the loop and the next thing that happens is that the editors at BBC que'ed up the tag line.  Every news agency wanted to be in front of the curve and the BBC jumped the gun. IMO this is similar to the 'news' that the miners in WVA were 'alive.'

[Conan71]

quote:Originally posted by iplaw

Oh boy.


Dueling nutcases.







For the love of all that's holy, please lock this thread.....

If you notice, "altruismsuffers" fills the header area for the user name.  I believe the full name is "altruismsuffers from paranoia".

[iplaw]

[iplaw]

[iplaw]

quote:Originally posted by tim huntzinger

That is a poor response to the story.  At least ya'll are not dumping on womyn or the mentally disabled.

My response to the BBC snafu is that authoritays had already determined that seven would fall because of the damage it had sustained.  That information did the loop and the next thing that happens is that the editors at BBC que'ed up the tag line.  Every news agency wanted to be in front of the curve and the BBC jumped the gun. IMO this is similar to the 'news' that the miners in WVA were 'alive.'

Aox.  Do yourself a favor and go back and re-read the threads we've already discussed this bullflop in.  Altruism has already had his donkey handed to him several times before.

[tim huntzinger]

Nope, not Aox here.  So who is seeing conspiracies, you think your opponents are sneakin' 'round changin' names and everything.  What a joke.  Sheesh, who is paranoid, someone who puts his name behind his convictions or someone who creeps around with a nom-de-plum insulting people?

[guido911]

Here is the obligatory AFDB:

http://zapatopi.net/afdb/

[tim huntzinger]

Here is the BBC's response to the furor.

Here is Alex Jones' 'analysis.'.

I DO NOT BELIEVE THE GUBMINT - EITHER THROUGH OMMISSION OR DIRECT ACTION - IS RESPONSIBLE FOR '911.'