News:

Long overdue maintenance happening. See post in the top forum.

Main Menu

Medlock and someone else's e-mails

Started by RecycleMichael, July 30, 2007, 10:22:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Gold

quote:
Originally posted by iplaw

quote:
He mentioned on-air that any emails from a certain period can be requested via Freedom of Info Act. In his sick mind, then, he wrote his own approval.
Let me get you a towel to wipe up the drool...Medlock was reitterating what Rees had already mentioned in an earlier interview.  It's a case of CYA at this point.  Until Rees mentioned it, I don't think Medlock ever used it as an excuse...in fact, I don't think Medlock was forward looking enough to even devise an excuse like that.

I get that you hate this guy, and that's okay, but please keep the tinfoil hat type comments to minimum.



I'm pretty sure Medlock's supporters (Michael Delgiorno, for the love) have the monopoly on tinfoil hats in this town.  I'm glad there were enough people left in town to see through Medlock and stop before he did any additional damage.

Gold

quote:
Originally posted by iplaw

quote:
He mentioned on-air that any emails from a certain period can be requested via Freedom of Info Act. In his sick mind, then, he wrote his own approval.
Let me get you a towel to wipe up the drool...Medlock was reitterating what Rees had already mentioned in an earlier interview.  It's a case of CYA at this point.  Until Rees mentioned it, I don't think Medlock ever used it as an excuse...in fact, I don't think Medlock was forward looking enough to even devise an excuse like that.

I get that you hate this guy, and that's okay, but please keep the tinfoil hat type comments to minimum.



Pretty sure that Medlock's supporters cornered the tinfoil hat market a long time ago.  I'm just glad Tulsa's voters figured out how ridiculous he was and stopped him.

shadows

In the best interest to the citizens of Tulsa, all councilors e-mails, sent over the public furnished resources, should be open for the public viewing as restricting them could be construed as a violation the same as the telephone conference phase of the of the open meetings act.

If such distribution is sent to the required number, as defined in the act, then this should be looked into whereas such e-mailing among council members possibly would include discussions on decisions that is to be brought before the council.
Today we stand in ecstasy and view that we build today'
Tomorrow we will enter into the plea to have it torn away.