How to Protect Yourself From Obamacare

[TulsaRufnex]

Obama should stay on the teleprompter.

Really?   Teleprompter?  Individual mandate?  

[nathanm]

Depending on how you interpret it

How do you interpret this?

With respect to health care, I'm actually -- continue to be confident that the Supreme Court will uphold the law. And the reason is because, in accordance with precedent out there, it's constitutional. That's not just my opinion, by the way; that's the opinion of legal experts across the ideological spectrum, including two very conservative appellate court justices that said this wasn't even a close case.

[Hoss]

Really?   Teleprompter?  Individual mandate?  

remember you're replying to Gaspar North...

[Conan71]

He's still obsessed with Reagan, I see.  I wonder if there's a photo of The Gipper on his dart board or bottom of his toilet.

[Gaspar]

Oh SNAP!  Holder just recognized the duty of the Supreme Court to exercise judicial review.  "Courts have final say."

I wonder if this means President Obama will move to dissolve the Supreme Court by imperial decree?

[nathanm]

Oh SNAP!  Holder just recognized the duty of the Supreme Court to exercise judicial review.  "Courts have final say."

Is your incessant need to parrot the most idiotic winger talking points you can find genetic, or is it socialization?

[Hoss]

Oh SNAP!  Holder just recognized the duty of the Supreme Court to exercise judicial review.  "Courts have final say."

I wonder if this means President Obama will move to dissolve the Supreme Court by imperial decree?

For the judiciary, resisting this temptation is particularly important, because it's the only branch that is unelected and whose officers serve for life. Unfortunately, some judges give in to temptation and make law instead of interpreting. Such judicial lawlessness is a threat to our democracy -- and it needs to stop. (Applause.)

Who said this?

How about:

http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2007/11/20071115-14.html

So this President isn't the only one to criticize the SCOTUS.

[Gaspar]

Is your incessant need to parrot the most idiotic winger talking points you can find genetic, or is it socialization?

Probably a bit of nature and nurture.  Perhaps I enjoy getting you all pinch-faced.
Have a sense of humor Nate.  I like to pick a bit of fun at narcissists and President Obama offers constant fodder.

[Teatownclown]

  Good one, Nate. ("I need a new keyboard as I laughed so hard the carrot juice spewing from my nose stucked it up" )

Correct me if I am wrong, but hasn't a certain mean streak of people been critical of Roe vs. Wade for many years? What's wrong with a President acting in the same manner? The right side of the court's been illegitimate since Bush v. Gore. Don't forget Corporations are people. Tell grandma to watch the speed limit or the police get to see her vagina.


A few more Republican Supreme Court appointments and we might as well welcome Big Brother to our homes.

Alito (62) - George "W" Bush
Roberts (57) - George "W" Bush
Thomas (63) - George H.W. Bush
Kennedy (75) - Reagan
Scalia (76) - Reagan


The High Court's Supremely Unethical Activists

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_high_courts_supremely_unethical_activists_20120404/?ln

[Gaspar]

Good one, Nate. ("I need a new keyboard as I laughed so hard the carrot juice spewing from my nose stucked it up" )

Correct me if I am wrong, but hasn't a certain mean streak of people been critical of Roe vs. Wade for many years? What's wrong with a President acting in the same manner? The right side of the court's been illegitimate since Bush v. Gore. Don't forget Corporations are people. Tell grandma to watch the speed limit or the police get to see her vagina.


A few more Republican Supreme Court appointments and we might as well welcome Big Brother to our homes.

Alito (62) - George "W" Bush
Roberts (57) - George "W" Bush
Thomas (63) - George H.W. Bush
Kennedy (75) - Reagan
Scalia (76) - Reagan


The High Court's Supremely Unethical Activists

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_high_courts_supremely_unethical_activists_20120404/?ln

So the SC really should be dissolved?

[Teatownclown]

So the SC really should be dissolved?

Skip to my Lou, Gassie. I never said that. But it's so typical these days to take something someone states and twist it, manipulate it for selfish intent. It's the rightie way of dealing with thought pattern.

[Teatownclown]

Here's some material for a new thread about how POTUS Obama dislikes old greazy white guys who refuse women the right to belong to a men's club....I can hear it coming.

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-believes-women-admitted-augusta-160833503--spt.html

[erfalf]

How do you interpret this?

I interpreted in the way he said it. He started by saying there was no precedent therefore they had no business meddling with laws passed by congress. Course, if that was the case, why would we have them anyways.

If this were passed by a state, there would be no problem in regards to the constitution. But with the federal government, it is a problem. Never has commerce been regulated in such a way, ie before it has actually occurred. Like I've said before, in my opinion it would be perfectly legal for them to dictate what kind of insurance people buy if they buy it.

[erfalf]

remember you're replying to Gaspar North...

Regardless of Obama's intelligence, you have got to admit he is a poor public speaker without a prompter. I haven't heard so many ums and ohs since elementary school speech class. And my teacher hated it then too.

[Gaspar]

Here's some material for a new thread about how POTUS Obama dislikes old greazy white guys who refuse women the right to belong to a men's club....I can hear it coming.

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-believes-women-admitted-augusta-160833503--spt.html

Besides Melody Barnes, has President Obama allowed women to join his foursome?

I remember Clinton always used to prefer women in his threesomes.