A grassroots organization focused on the intelligent and sustainable development, preservation and revitalization of Tulsa.
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 05, 2024, 05:19:26 pm
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: St. John's rezoning and Utica Corridor  (Read 6148 times)
Tulsasaurus Rex
Civic Leader
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 301


« on: January 10, 2016, 11:49:01 am »

Preserve Midtown told me "St. John's and the surrounding residents have been working together to create the Utica Corridor Master Plan. St. John's is getting ready to rezone its' campus from the old PUD designation to the new MX-I designation. They have invited their neighborhoods to a meeting to discuss this rezoning."

Does anyone know that practical implications that's going to bring? What's actually going to change about St. John's campus? Do they own some land around there besides that which the medical buildings sit on?

A related question: There are several large, empty lots on the northwest corner of 21st and Utica. What's up with that? Seems like that's crying out to be developed. A hotel could make since. Lots of people come from out of town to visit relatives in the hospital. Utica Square probably wouldn't mind having more customers sleeping across the street.
Logged
dbacksfan 2.0
City Father
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1912


« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2016, 12:05:26 pm »

That's one lot IIRC, it was the former location for Helmerich & Payne's office building. I think back in 2007 or 2008 there was a discussion here about building a hotel on that lot just like you suggested.
Logged
SXSW
City Father
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4887


WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2016, 01:05:57 pm »

AFAIK Helmerich & Payne still owns that lot where their building used to be.  I don't know about the land to the west but that entire site from St Louis to Utica is a great infill opportunity next to St John/Utica Square.  A Hotel has been rumored there but I don't think there are any solid plans in place. 

The views from any kind of tower there would be awesome.  If you want a nice skyline view go to the top of the parking garage next to the office building right there.
Logged

 
Tulsasaurus Rex
Civic Leader
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 301


« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2016, 04:25:04 pm »

Anyone know how rezoning St. John's campus will actually change anything?
Logged
PonderInc
City Dweller
City Father
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2460


« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2016, 04:28:28 pm »

What's confusing is that there's no such thing as MXI zoning.  There's MX1, 2 or 3, and there's IMX.

MX1 is Mixed Use "neighborhood" - the lowest intensity of the new mixed-use zoning districts.  It corresponds to what most of us think of when we picture historic main streets.  Small scale, residential, retail and dining, built up to the street.  In the new code, Mixed-Use districts have 3 possible "intensities" (1-neighborhood,2-community,3-regional); 4 possible "character" designations (pedestrian, urban, variable, or flexible); and 5 possible height designations (max heights of 35,45, 55, 65 or unlimited).  

IMX is the old Institutional Mixed Use that was introduced in the zoning code a while back, prior to the recent update.  It still exists and my guess is that this is what they meant.  Maybe Lou confused himself when filling out the application?  

I haven't focused that much time on the IMX district, but it appears to have some good rules compared to some of the other zoning options. (Not as desirable as MX-1, but oh well.)

Right now, I can't find a separate application for the re-zoning, just an application for the abandonment.  I guess this would happen concurrently?  So it does matter if they mean MX1 or IMX.  Those are two very different things.  But since the IMX was basically created for use around medical facilities, I'm assuming this is what's intended.

Logged
Conan71
Recovering Republican
T-Town Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 29334



« Reply #5 on: January 11, 2016, 05:52:44 pm »

AFAIK Helmerich & Payne still owns that lot where their building used to be.  I don't know about the land to the west but that entire site from St Louis to Utica is a great infill opportunity next to St John/Utica Square.  A Hotel has been rumored there but I don't think there are any solid plans in place. 

The views from any kind of tower there would be awesome.  If you want a nice skyline view go to the top of the parking garage next to the office building right there.

The Helmerichs could donate er cheap sell that land for the new REI and the city can leave their namesake park alone  Shocked
Logged

"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first” -Ronald Reagan
dbacksfan 2.0
City Father
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1912


« Reply #6 on: January 11, 2016, 08:55:26 pm »

The Helmerichs could donate er cheap sell that land for the new REI and the city can leave their namesake park alone  Shocked

Always the optimist, that's probably one of the best land swap deals I have heard in a while. Save the park, upscale outdoor  sports business across from Utica Square, still close to River Parks, nice setting away from South Tulsa mess..........

Good thinking!
Logged
Conan71
Recovering Republican
T-Town Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 29334



« Reply #7 on: January 11, 2016, 10:28:52 pm »

Always the optimist, that's probably one of the best land swap deals I have heard in a while. Save the park, upscale outdoor  sports business across from Utica Square, still close to River Parks, nice setting away from South Tulsa mess..........

Good thinking!

That would be a great location...or the old Miss Jacksons.
Logged

"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first” -Ronald Reagan
Breadburner
City Father
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4444


WWW
« Reply #8 on: January 11, 2016, 10:32:45 pm »

Zippin the lip....
Logged

 
Conan71
Recovering Republican
T-Town Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 29334



« Reply #9 on: January 11, 2016, 10:42:14 pm »

Zippin the lip....

Jono could make that happen
Logged

"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first” -Ronald Reagan
Tulsasaurus Rex
Civic Leader
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 301


« Reply #10 on: January 21, 2016, 08:13:41 am »

Quote
This article explains a whole lotta nothing

That's exactly what I was thinking. They kept the neighbors in the loop and now have permission to do something, but not other things, but don't have any plans to do anything.



« Last Edit: January 21, 2016, 12:47:09 pm by Moderator » Logged
PonderInc
City Dweller
City Father
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2460


« Reply #11 on: January 21, 2016, 11:06:48 am »

As a continuing part of PlaniTulsa, the city is now taking small area planning more seriously.  In the old days, you'd come up with a plan, it would be approved, and then it would sit on the shelf and be ignored by everyone. Developers would cry that they'd never heard of the decade-long planning process, and then they'd do whatever the heck they wanted.

Since PlaniTulsa, the city has gotten a lot better at handling small area planning.  It's more inclusive and more structured.  There's a more formal framework for how it's done.  And, miracle of miracles... even the Planning Commission seems to be paying more attention to them.

The Utica Midtown Corridor Small Area Plan was one of the first to be completed after PlaniTulsa.  It has a north section (the area around Hilcrest) and a south section (the area around St. John).  The plan was developed with lots of input from all stakeholders, including the hospitals, big boy developers/property owners, neighbors and small business owners.  As a result, everyone was heard, and everyone had to give a little, but they seem to have come to a pretty good agreement.

So now there's a plan that sets out the kinds of development people want to see.  It also includes expectations for where growth will occur and how to handle the transitions between intensive hospital / medical facilities and residential properties.  And it shows how human-scaled mixed-use, streetscaping, lighting, landscaping, etc play a role in that.  One of the major benefits may be that developers participated in the process, so they can't claim to be ignorant of what this stuff means or what is expected. (If I recall correctly, it was Bumgarner and St. John who really initiated the process, which isn't a bad thing, since the neighbors showed up in force, too.) 

Here's the link to the Utica Midtown Corridor Plan: https://www.cityoftulsa.org/media/359206/Utica_Midtown_Corridor_SAP_small.pdf

The re-zoning to IMX helps create uniformity and predictability.  This is better than having a bunch of random, outdated PUDs cobbled together.

Having said all of this, I was not involved personally in the Utica plan.  I'm sure that a neighborhood resident may have a different interpretation than the above.  But I would assume that if Chip showed up to speak in favor of the re-zoning plan, that means the neighbors are OK with it.  He's not afraid to speak up when he feels the neighbors are being screwed.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

 
  Hosted by TulsaConnect and Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
 

Mission

 

"TulsaNow's Mission is to help Tulsa become the most vibrant, diverse, sustainable and prosperous city of our size. We achieve this by focusing on the development of Tulsa's distinctive identity and economic growth around a dynamic, urban core, complemented by a constellation of livable, thriving communities."
more...

 

Contact

 

2210 S Main St.
Tulsa, OK 74114
(918) 409-2669
info@tulsanow.org