This Will Not Please the Troofers

[sgrizzle]

quote:Originally posted by altruismsuffers

Do you really think that the Main Stream Media is that far behind and incompetent?

YES

Now, what were we talking about?

[Conan71]

It's one thing to ask questions.  It's entirely another to spew dip-**** Star Trek theories about how it happened.

[altruismsuffers]

quote:Originally posted by Conan71

It's one thing to ask questions.  It's entirely another to spew dip-**** Star Trek theories about how it happened.

 Why do you all keep talking about "crazy theories"  Go dig and see if you can find a post in which I propose some "crazy theory"

Hell, Both Kean and Hamilton have twice stated publicly, once in their 2006 book, Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission, and again in the January 2, 2008, New York Times, that there are inaccuracies in their report and unanswered--or mis-answered--questions.
Why were the 9/11 tapes destroyed?

[cannon_fodder]

Am I mistaken or have you not argued in the past that:

1) The government conspired to commit or aid these attacks

2) A missile shot down Flight 97

3) The WTC was brought down with demolition

4) No plane hit the pentagon, it was a missile

If not, then what IS your argument? If vague notions of "why were tapes destroyed" are the end questions you want answered then it really doesn't matter.  If you want to know why they were destroyed because you suspect the above... then the burden of proof is yours and the answer STILL doesnt matter.

Stop defending and tell us what your getting at.

[altruismsuffers]

quote:Originally posted by cannon_fodder

Am I mistaken or have you not argued in the past that:

1) The government conspired to commit or aid these attacks

2) A missile shot down Flight 97

3) The WTC was brought down with demolition

4) No plane hit the pentagon, it was a missile

If not, then what IS your argument? If vague notions of "why were tapes destroyed" are the end questions you want answered then it really doesn't matter.  If you want to know why they were destroyed because you suspect the above... then the burden of proof is yours and the answer STILL doesnt matter.

Stop defending and tell us what your getting at.

I have not argued this as fact, I have argued about the EVIDENCE that suggests some of these things.  

Your point 1.) You first have to realize some of the huge gaps between what really happened and the official story before you can understand this idea, so place this last on the list.  

Your point 2.) Donald Rumsfeld says the plane over Pennsylvania was shot down

Your point 3.)  What does the evidence suggest?  Eyewitness and Meida accounts of bombs at WTC complex
9/11 Commission BARS 503 first responders  You have to watch both of these too see where I am coming from and this is just a piece of the evidence, if you don't watch them DO NOT criticize my ideas.  

Your Point 4.) Show me evidence that a plane hit the pentagon.  Does any real evidence exist or just the "scraps" they told you were proof?

[buckeye]

Is this a way to get back at the world for canceling "The Lone Gunman"?

[Breadburner]

[EDITED]

[altruismsuffers]

quote:Originally posted by Breadburner

[EDITED]

[UNCOOL]

[Derailed]

quote:Originally posted by altruismsuffers

quote:Originally posted by Conan71

It's one thing to ask questions.  It's entirely another to spew dip-**** Star Trek theories about how it happened.

 Why do you all keep talking about "crazy theories"  Go dig and see if you can find a post in which I propose some "crazy theory"

Hell, Both Kean and Hamilton have twice stated publicly, once in their 2006 book, Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission, and again in the January 2, 2008, New York Times, that there are inaccuracies in their report and unanswered--or mis-answered--questions.
Why were the 9/11 tapes destroyed?

[EDITED]

the 9/11 Commission report is not a perfect report - they never are.  Did the CIA prevent some top secret stuff from coming out - well probably.  

Kean and Hamilton wrote a book about the commission seem to have a motive - its called money!  They want to sell more books.

When our nation turns against itself, we are in real trouble.

Our nation is likely in the fight of our lives from a creeping Islamic global rule.  

Let's argue if that's real or not.

[guido911]

quote:Originally posted by Derailed

quote:Originally posted by altruismsuffers

quote:Originally posted by Conan71

It's one thing to ask questions.  It's entirely another to spew dip-**** Star Trek theories about how it happened.

 Why do you all keep talking about "crazy theories"  Go dig and see if you can find a post in which I propose some "crazy theory"

Hell, Both Kean and Hamilton have twice stated publicly, once in their 2006 book, Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission, and again in the January 2, 2008, New York Times, that there are inaccuracies in their report and unanswered--or mis-answered--questions.
Why were the 9/11 tapes destroyed?

[EDITED]

You needed ALT to post [EDITED] to get some insight into this guy? Read some of his posts or, better yet, look at the whooping he took from IP on this issue several months ago. Better yet, look at his website.

Anyone have a link to that newscast/infomercial he appears in?

[altruismsuffers]

quote:Originally posted by altruismsuffers

quote:Originally posted by Breadburner

[EDITED]

[UNCOOL]

I assure you this was COOL.

Derailed:  "creeping Islamic global rule"  Are you serious?  Have you been listening to too much Bruce Delay?  We have a military budget  that is bigger then the rest of the world's combined and you think that a few nuts who blow themselves up is "creeping Islamic global rule"?   Do you live in the closet because you're afraid the boogie man is gonna get ya?

Hell if you were around a few decades ago you would be preaching about the "creeping communist global rule"

Or wait, if you lived in germany it would have been the "creeping Jewish global rule"

Why don't you wake up and smell the lies buddy this whole FAKE enemy thing has gone on too many times for you to keep falling for it.

[swake]

quote:Originally posted by altruismsuffers

quote:Originally posted by altruismsuffers

quote:Originally posted by Breadburner

[EDITED]

[UNCOOL]

I assure you this was COOL.

Derailed:  "creeping Islamic global rule"  Are you serious?  Have you been listening to too much Bruce Delay?  We have a military budget  that is bigger then the rest of the world's combined and you think that a few nuts who blow themselves up is "creeping Islamic global rule"?   Do you live in the closet because you're afraid the boogie man is gonna get ya?

Hell if you were around a few decades ago you would be preaching about the "creeping communist global rule"

Or wait, if you lived in germany it would have been the "creeping Jewish global rule"

Why don't you wake up and smell the lies buddy this whole FAKE enemy thing has gone on too many times for you to keep falling for it.

Why don't you google "asymmetrical warfare" and find out if we have anything to be worried about, and while you are at it, try to figure out how we lost Vietnam with such an advantage in military spending. Hell, research WW-I and the crusades.

[altruismsuffers]

Swake I don't really understand what asymmetrical warfare has to do with what I said.

[swake]

quote:Originally posted by altruismsuffers

Swake I don't really understand what  has to do with what I said.

You have your head in the sand if you can't connect "asymmetrical warfare" with "We have a military budget that is bigger then the rest of the world's combined and you think that a few nuts who blow themselves up is "creeping Islamic global rule"

It is the goal of a segment of the Islamic would to remake the world their way, they fight without morals and using any means. We are certainly in an "asymmetrical war" and the more we hit back with the sledgehammer of our might the more the shattered pieces left by our strikes become sharp and dangerous.

We are in a very serious conflict and our strength, and stupidity, is being used against us.