Sarah Palin on Jerry Springer?

[iplaw]

Don't worry.  BO will fix the jobs problem driving down the DOW today.  He's going to ensure that more people lose their jobs by hiking taxes on the businesses that employ them... []

[pmcalk]

If she doesn't make it to Jerry Springer, there is always the National Enquirer:

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/09/03/politics/fromtheroad/entry4413030.shtml

Not that I care about whether she had an affair or not, or even believe the National Enquirer, but I am sure this won't help her image.

[Rico]

quote:Originally posted by iplaw

Don't worry.  BO will fix the jobs problem driving down the DOW today.  He's going to ensure that more people lose their jobs by hiking taxes on the businesses that employ them... []

He could always start a war and create a labor shortage... Don'tcha think?

Maybe that would offset the tax problem...

I would have to ask someone familiar with "the math" to be sure.

[Gaspar]

quote:Originally posted by iraqniphobia

quote:Originally posted by Friendly Bear

quote:Originally posted by iraqniphobia

The fact that people think someone who was a sports reporter, became mayor of a town of 8000, and governor of one of the least populated states for less than two years is somehow more experienced than someone who graduated from Columbia, Harvard, was president of the Harvard Law Review, and 12 years in public service is down right baffling.

You left out Palin being President of the PTA, and two terms on the City Council.

She defeated an incumbent Good-Old Boy's GOP Governor, then defeated a previous Democrat Governor.

Obama defeated a GOP STAND-IN Alan Keyes, after Mr. Ryan couldn't take the slime of a California Democrat Judge UNSEALING a sealed divorce file.

In order to slime him.  He admitted in a deposition that he wanted to SLEEP WITH his wife, Actress Jeri "Juggs" Ryan.

That's how we got Senator Obama the Redeemer, care of the Cook County Democrat Political Machine.

STOP THE MACHINE.

[!]

So much experience required to run a country can be learned from running the PTA of a town of 8000.

Or a state with a 40 Billion dollar budget.  That's billion with a B.

But I'm sure that's not important.  After-all, Obama was a community organizer.

[iplaw]

quote:Originally posted by pmcalk

If she doesn't make it to Jerry Springer, there is always the National Enquirer:

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/09/03/politics/fromtheroad/entry4413030.shtml

Not that I care about whether she had an affair or not, or even believe the National Enquirer, but I am sure this won't help her image.

And that's all that matters for democrats at this point.  Smearing is all that's left...no pun intended...or not.

[Conan71]

quote:Originally posted by iplaw

quote:Originally posted by pmcalk

If she doesn't make it to Jerry Springer, there is always the National Enquirer:

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/09/03/politics/fromtheroad/entry4413030.shtml

Not that I care about whether she had an affair or not, or even believe the National Enquirer, but I am sure this won't help her image.

And that's all that matters for democrats at this point.  Smearing is all that's left...no pun intended...or not.

That's all they are interested in since there's no accomplishments for Obama to run on himself.  No one seems to be able to properly rebut Gov. Palin's assertion that he's never authored two pieces of legislation, so they will just ramp up the smearing.  She obviously pissed off a lot of people down at the DNC, she must be THAT good.

[pmcalk]

quote:Originally posted by iplaw

quote:Originally posted by pmcalk

If she doesn't make it to Jerry Springer, there is always the National Enquirer:

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/09/03/politics/fromtheroad/entry4413030.shtml

Not that I care about whether she had an affair or not, or even believe the National Enquirer, but I am sure this won't help her image.

And that's all that matters for democrats at this point.  Smearing is all that's left...no pun intended...or not.

True, after you finish pointing out the relevant facts  (i.e., that she was before the bridge to nowhere before she was against it, that she is currently under two ethics investigations for abuse of power, that she received over 6 million $ in earmarks for Wasilla (a town of 6 thousand) and that she requested more earmarks per person than any other state, that she spoke before a radical political group, that she characterized the Iraq war as a mission of God, and that she has virtually no experience to name a few examples) all you have left is smearing her family--that same family that she and republican party hold out as reasons to support her.

[Conan71]

quote:Originally posted by pmcalk

quote:Originally posted by iplaw

quote:Originally posted by pmcalk

If she doesn't make it to Jerry Springer, there is always the National Enquirer:

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/09/03/politics/fromtheroad/entry4413030.shtml

Not that I care about whether she had an affair or not, or even believe the National Enquirer, but I am sure this won't help her image.

And that's all that matters for democrats at this point.  Smearing is all that's left...no pun intended...or not.

True, after you finish pointing out the relevant facts  (i.e., that she was before the bridge to nowhere before she was against it, that she is currently under two ethics investigations for abuse of power, that she received over 6 million $ in earmarks for Wasilla (a town of 6 thousand) and that she requested more earmarks per person than any other state, that she spoke before a radical political group, that she characterized the Iraq war as a mission of God, and that she has virtually no experience to name a few examples) all you have left is smearing her family--that same family that she and republican party hold out as reasons to support her.

Wow, read Hufpo or Kos much?

This is what puzzles me as to why you dislike her so much.  Other than the Iraq war part, she sounds a lot like a Democrat to me.

[Hometown]

Give me the name and number of any Democrat that wants to teach the Christian Bible in Public Schools.

That alone is a deal killer.

This position would have been unthinkable until the last decade or so when Republicans bought their votes by pandering to the religous nuts.

Guess what?  Moderate Republicans want their party freed from religious nuts but this election is demonstrating that the religious nuts are all you have going for you.

Long gone are the days when you had great moderate leaders like Ford and Rockefeller

[pmcalk]

quote:Originally posted by Conan71

quote:Originally posted by pmcalk

quote:Originally posted by iplaw

quote:Originally posted by pmcalk

If she doesn't make it to Jerry Springer, there is always the National Enquirer:

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/09/03/politics/fromtheroad/entry4413030.shtml

Not that I care about whether she had an affair or not, or even believe the National Enquirer, but I am sure this won't help her image.

And that's all that matters for democrats at this point.  Smearing is all that's left...no pun intended...or not.

True, after you finish pointing out the relevant facts  (i.e., that she was before the bridge to nowhere before she was against it, that she is currently under two ethics investigations for abuse of power, that she received over 6 million $ in earmarks for Wasilla (a town of 6 thousand) and that she requested more earmarks per person than any other state, that she spoke before a radical political group, that she characterized the Iraq war as a mission of God, and that she has virtually no experience to name a few examples) all you have left is smearing her family--that same family that she and republican party hold out as reasons to support her.

Wow, read Hufpo or Kos much?

This is what puzzles me as to why you dislike her so much.  Other than the Iraq war part, she sounds a lot like a Democrat to me.

Everything that I wrote has been proven by sources other than Huffingtonpost or Dailykos.  Is there anything that I wrote that you would like to challenge?

[USRufnex]

No, because Conan will repeat the same lies over and over and over again.... like this one....

That's all they are interested in since there's no accomplishments for Obama to run on himself. No one seems to be able to properly rebut Gov. Palin's assertion that he's never authored two pieces of legislation, so they will just ramp up the smearing. She obviously pissed off a lot of people down at the DNC, she must be THAT good.

Lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie.

That's all you do, Conan.... I've responded.  Others have responded.  You must like Palin, because she spent the entire night lying about Obama...

By repeating the same lie (that Obama doesn't write any of his legislation).... you lose all credibility in this thread and all the other threads....

But keep beating that dead horse... after you've been owned over and over again on this issue...



http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Legislative_Experience_Senator_Barack_Obama_D_IL

[Conan71]

quote:Originally posted by USRufnex

No, because Conan will repeat the same lies over and over and over again.... like this one....

That's all they are interested in since there's no accomplishments for Obama to run on himself. No one seems to be able to properly rebut Gov. Palin's assertion that he's never authored two pieces of legislation, so they will just ramp up the smearing. She obviously pissed off a lot of people down at the DNC, she must be THAT good.

Lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie.

That's all you do, Conan.... I've responded.  Others have responded.  You must like Palin, because she spent the entire night lying about Obama...

By repeating the same lie (that Obama doesn't write any of his legislation).... you lose all credibility in this thread and all the other threads....

But keep beating that dead horse... after you've been owned over and over again on this issue...



http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Legislative_Experience_Senator_Barack_Obama_D_IL

No, you responded with more articles talking about all these bills he "sponsored" "approved" "voted for" "passed".  The closest you got was from faux conservative Andrew Sullivan.  Not even the mighty Sullivan manages to detail what these bills were that Obama authored.

I dropped the gauntlet, you failed in your mission Grasshopper.  You may not snatch the marble from my hand.

Look, you know why you are voting for Obama and I respect the hell out of that.  You didn't just blindly decide to vote for him, you've done your research and I don't think I've ever seen you waver on him.  Based on my research, he's not the candidate for me.  All ugliness aside, I do respect that you've looked into your candidate and you have not been a party-line pantywaste.

[iplaw]

quote:Originally posted by Hometown

Give me the name and number of any Democrat that wants to teach the Christian Bible in Public Schools.

That alone is a deal killer.

Proof please?

[iplaw]

quote:Originally posted by pmcalk

quote:Originally posted by iplaw

quote:Originally posted by pmcalk

If she doesn't make it to Jerry Springer, there is always the National Enquirer:

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/09/03/politics/fromtheroad/entry4413030.shtml

Not that I care about whether she had an affair or not, or even believe the National Enquirer, but I am sure this won't help her image.

And that's all that matters for democrats at this point.  Smearing is all that's left...no pun intended...or not.

True, after you finish pointing out the relevant facts  (i.e., that she was before the bridge to nowhere before she was against it, that she is currently under two ethics investigations for abuse of power, that she received over 6 million $ in earmarks for Wasilla (a town of 6 thousand) and that she requested more earmarks per person than any other state, that she spoke before a radical political group, that she characterized the Iraq war as a mission of God, and that she has virtually no experience to name a few examples) all you have left is smearing her family--that same family that she and republican party hold out as reasons to support her.

Leaving aside the fact that half of what you presented is only one side of the story...what would be equally fascinating is if you'd bother to look that closely into the past activities and faults of your own candidates...

You've done more research into a woman who's been in the campaign for less than a week than you have for your candidate who's been running for the better part of two years.

[jne]

quote:Originally posted by Conan71

quote:Originally posted by iraqniphobia

The fact that people think someone who was a sports reporter, became mayor of a town of 8000, and governor of one of the least populated states for less than two years is somehow more experienced than someone who graduated from Columbia, Harvard, was president of the Harvard Law Review, and 12 years in public service is down right baffling.

Obama has refused to release any information regarding his grades at Columbia or Harvard.  Being president of the Law Review doesn't automatically say anything about his educational prowess nor leadership skills.

People who have been asked have said his time at Columbia and Harvard were rather unremarkable other than being the first black president of the review.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE2DC1631F935A35751C0A966958260

Well, if that is so important to you, McCains record isn't so remarkable and Palin was lucky to get out of undergrad.

• Palin attended Hawaii Pacific College for one semester  in 1982
• Transferred to North Idaho College in 1982 and selected to major in business administration
•Matanuska-Susitna College, Palmer, Alaska: Fall 1985 (UPDATE)
• Graduated in 1987 from the University of Idaho with a B.S. in communications and journalism