Obama's Interference in Iraq

[Crash Daily]

quote:Originally posted by FOTD

quote:Originally posted by Crash Daily

I'm not defending McCain. I just think that much less of Obama's character and all he stands for, not to mention HIS experience. I think that Palin is better equipped to lead this country than all three Senators combined, with John being the next best. Obama is a parrot with the least real world leadership experience of the three. If years in the Senate mean something and building coalitions mean something and actually sponsoring bills means something, at least john has that. Sarah is the best person of the options available and Obama is the worst. Obama is on the front of the Dem ticket. Nuff said.

How many concusions have you had?

Well, obviously no where near the amount you have. I'd say you're way past punch drunk and moving in to the dementia stage, right along with the rest of Dems. []

[FOTD]

Hey, The devil requested you quit quoting Reagan. The Reagans thought John McCain was a dick with a man hanging off of it. They hated McCain....Show some respect for the Reagans.

[waterboy]

quote:Originally posted by FOTD

Hey, The devil requested you quit quoting Reagan. The Reagans thought John McCain was a dick with a man hanging off of it. They hated McCain....Show some respect for the Reagans.

He has to quote someone else. Has no thoughts of his own.

If ever a poster deserved to be blocked this one does. Join me in this crusade. I won't dignify his rantings with a response unless I accidentally respond in the Tulsa World. At least IP, Conan, Gas-mask, and the other McCain sympathizers make an effort to prove their assertions and don't consider the opposition as evil Marxist, Socialist, Communist, Fascist drains on society.

[iplaw]

quote:Originally posted by waterboy

quote:Originally posted by FOTD

Hey, The devil requested you quit quoting Reagan. The Reagans thought John McCain was a dick with a man hanging off of it. They hated McCain....Show some respect for the Reagans.

He has to quote someone else. Has no thoughts of his own.

If ever a poster deserved to be blocked this one does. Join me in this crusade. I won't dignify his rantings with a response unless I accidentally respond in the Tulsa World. At least IP, Conan, Gas-mask, and the other McCain sympathizers make an effort to prove their assertions and don't consider the opposition as evil Marxist, Socialist, Communist, Fascist drains on society.

You won't dignify his rantings, but you put up with FOTD's daily racist, and hateful rantings?  Look no further than the post you quoted of FOTD.  Do those kind of statements deserve anything other than your disdain?

[waterboy]

quote:Originally posted by iplaw

quote:Originally posted by waterboy

quote:Originally posted by FOTD

Hey, The devil requested you quit quoting Reagan. The Reagans thought John McCain was a dick with a man hanging off of it. They hated McCain....Show some respect for the Reagans.

He has to quote someone else. Has no thoughts of his own.

If ever a poster deserved to be blocked this one does. Join me in this crusade. I won't dignify his rantings with a response unless I accidentally respond in the Tulsa World. At least IP, Conan, Gas-mask, and the other McCain sympathizers make an effort to prove their assertions and don't consider the opposition as evil Marxist, Socialist, Communist, Fascist drains on society.

You won't dignify his rantings, but you put up with FOTD's daily racist, and hateful rantings?  Look no further than the post you quoted of FOTD.  Do those kind of statements deserve anything other than your disdain?

Fair enough.

I don't put this guy in the same category. FOTD knows the difference between all the "isms" and doesn't rely on unsubtantiated charges. His links may be extremely partisan but based on some viewpoint that is defended with fact or logic. For instance the last post is an exaggeration of a sentiment expressed by the Reagans about McCain by an author who researched and reported graciously on the Reagans.

However, posting some illiterate blogger's rantings about Fascism being a Democratic trait is not only innacurate but beneath support by a literate Republican defender like yourself.

[guido911]

Here's more "kool aid" for us "conservatives".


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKqHFk-3yQM&eurl=http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/


Kool aid, gosh that's funny. It's almost as if I never heard that before.

[Crash Daily]

Wow, Waterboy. Don't get your panties in a wad. Are you menstruating or what? You say I have no thoughts in my head but then defend a person who posts other peoples thoughts 90% of the time, when I hardly ever do so? Yah, you're reaching. I can almost picture your head spinning, with venom or Satan spew, flying out of your mouth. [}:)]

It's sad that you get so uptight about who you and your Party are and what you really stand for. Common man, your gaybies and lezbo's came out of the closet years ago. Grow some cahones!

[waterboy]

There's your guy IP. I'll take a clever, insightful, intellectual left wing extremist any day to that.

[iplaw]

quote:Originally posted by waterboy

There's your guy IP. I'll take a clever, insightful, intellectual left wing extremist any day to that.

I'm sorry.  How do the words clever, insightful or intellectual apply to FOTD?

[waterboy]

quote:Originally posted by iplaw

quote:Originally posted by waterboy

There's your guy IP. I'll take a clever, insightful, intellectual left wing extremist any day to that.

I'm sorry.  How do the words clever, insightful or intellectual apply to FOTD?

In contrast with descriptions of Crash and Burn.

[iplaw]

quote:Originally posted by waterboy

quote:Originally posted by iplaw

quote:Originally posted by waterboy

There's your guy IP. I'll take a clever, insightful, intellectual left wing extremist any day to that.

I'm sorry.  How do the words clever, insightful or intellectual apply to FOTD?

In contrast with descriptions of Crash and Burn.

Thanks for not answering my question.  I think you and Hometown are the only ones left on this forum who actually defend that pariah.

[waterboy]

quote:Originally posted by iplaw

quote:Originally posted by waterboy

quote:Originally posted by iplaw

quote:Originally posted by waterboy

There's your guy IP. I'll take a clever, insightful, intellectual left wing extremist any day to that.

I'm sorry.  How do the words clever, insightful or intellectual apply to FOTD?

In contrast with descriptions of Crash and Burn.

Thanks for not answering my question.  I think you and Hometown are the only ones left on this forum who actually defend that pariah.

That's too bad. I defend you too. But not someone who jumps in with both feet, no understanding of history and refers to Democrats as a group in terms less than human. If that's the level of discourse you enjoy, he's your man.

[iplaw]

Ugh.  Why bother.  If you want to pretend that FOTD adds something to the dialogue around here go for it.  90% of the threads he starts have one and only on participant in them because engaging with him is j##$king off with a cheese grater.

[guido911]

More kool-aid:

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/19/new-mccain-ad-meet-the-guy-obama-wants-to-chat-with/

[pmcalk]

quote:Originally posted by guido911

This story broke yesterday:

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/15/did-obama-try-to-scotch-an-iraqi-us-agreement-on-military-forces/

What is unusual is Obama's response, which was analyzed here:

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/15/did-obama-try-to-scotch-an-iraqi-us-agreement-on-military-forces/

While these are evil conservative websites, the substance of the article in the NY Post and Obama's response is intact.  

If what is alleged is true, Obama is at a minimum a hypocrite on troop draw downs. More likely is that the McCain campaign and most assuredly the 527s will have a field day.

Still more lies.  In addition to Obama and Republicans Lugar and Hagel saying that this story is simply not true, members of the Bush administration, who were present, collaborate Obama's version of the story:

quote:
A Bush administration official with knowledge of the meeting says that, during the meeting, Obama stressed to al-Maliki that he would not interfere with President Bush's negotiations concerning the U.S. troop presence in Iraq, and that he supports the Bush administration's position on the need to negotiate, as soon as possible, the Status of Forces Agreement, which deals with, among other matters, U.S. troops having immunity from local prosecution.

Hmmm.  Wonder if Palin even knows what the Status of Forces Agreement or the Stratgic Framework Agreement is.