News:

Long overdue maintenance happening. See post in the top forum.

Main Menu

Quit Eating Sarah!

Started by Conan71, September 17, 2008, 04:18:03 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Conan71

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/09/17/enough_of_the_palin_feeding_frenzy/?p1=Well_MostPop_Emailed3

Enough of the Palin feeding frenzy, Jeff Jacoby, Boston Globe

IN POLITICS, cheap shots and invective are occupational hazards. But when have we seen anything to match the frenzy of rage and contempt set off by the nomination of Sarah Palin?

Virtually from the moment John McCain selected her, Palin has been under assault. There has been legitimate criticism, of course. But there has also been a gusher of slander, much of it - like the slur that she isn't the real mother of her infant son, Trig - despicable.

For someone who has been in the national spotlight for only three weeks, Palin has been the victim of an astonishing array of falsehoods. Voters have been told that she slashed funding in Alaska for special-needs children. That she tried to ban books from Wasilla's public library. That she was a member of the secessionist Alaskan Independence Party. That she links Saddam Hussein to the attacks of 9/11. That she backed Pat Buchanan for president. That she doesn't want students taught about contraception. That she called the war in Iraq "a task from God." All untrue.

Hillary Clinton's supporters complain that coverage of her campaign was tainted by sexism, such as the Washington Post story that focused on her cleavage, or Mike Barnicle's description of her on MSNBC as "looking like everyone's first wife standing outside a probate court."

Obama too has suffered the slings and arrows of outrageous comment - the Fox News segment that captioned a picture of his wife "Obama's Baby Mama," for example, and the infamous New Yorker cover showing the Obamas as terrorists in the Oval Office.

But the left's onslaught against Palin has been of a different order of magnitude.

"Ideologically, she is their hardcore pornographic centerfold spread," columnist Cintra Wilson wrote in Salon. "She's such a power-mad, backwater beauty-pageant casualty, it's easy to write her off and make fun of her. But in reality I feel as horrified as a ghetto Jew watching the rise of National Socialism."

On the website of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, commentator Heather Mallick was even cruder. Palin appeals to "the white trash vote" with her "toned-down version of the porn actress look," she wrote. "Husband Todd looks like a roughneck. . . What normal father would want Levi 'I'm a [bleeping] redneck' Johnson prodding his daughter?"

From radio talk-show host Randi Rhodes came the smutty suggestion that the governor of Alaska has an unhealthy interest in teenage boys: "She's friends with all the teenage boys," Rhodes told her audience last week. "You have to say no when your kids say, 'Can we sleep over at the Palins?' No! NO!"

The smears and sneers have been without end. One liberal congressman likened Obama to Jesus - and Palin to Pontius Pilate. A Democratic state chairman declared scornfully that Palin's "primary qualification seems to be that she hasn't had an abortion." A University of Chicago professor seethed: "Her greatest hypocrisy is in her pretense that she is a woman."

The national media, meanwhile, have only further eroded what remained of their reputation for objectivity.

For months they refused to mention the infidelity of John Edwards, yet they leaped with relish onto Bristol Palin's pregnancy . Ravenous for any negative morsel on the GOP running mate, they deployed legions of reporters to Alaska, who have produced such journalism as the 3,220-word exposé; in Sunday's New York Times that upon winning office, Palin - gasp! - fired opponents and hired people she trusted.

Yet the more she has been attacked, the more her support has solidified. In the latest Fox News poll, Palin's favorable/unfavorable ratio is a strong 54-27. She is named by 33 percent of respondents as the candidate who "best understands the problems of everyday life in America," more than those naming Obama (32 percent), McCain (17), or Joe Biden (10). Among independent voters, Palin's lead over Obama on this measure widens to 13 points. In a recent Rasmussen poll, 51 percent of voters said the press was trying to hurt Palin through its coverage, versus just 5 percent who thought it was trying to help - a 10-1 disparity.

Millions of Americans, not all of them conservative, instinctively identify with Palin. That is why the left's scorching assault, so ugly and unhinged, is backfiring. The longer it goes on, the more it undermines the Democratic ticket - and the more support it builds for McCain, and his refreshingly normal running mate.

"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan

Townsend

I'll give you this one.  The tanning bed thing is going overboard.

Hometown

She was old news as of yesterday.  None of the spin doctors were talking about her last night.  Yesterday's frenzy was McCain misspeaking on the economy.



RecycleMichael

quote:
Originally posted by Townsend

I'll give you this one.  The tanning bed thing is going overboard.



That was the issue that told me that she wasn't fully vetted.

I mean, John McCain has had a terrible time with skin cancer. He has had four melanomas removed since 1993.

She goes and has a tanning bed installed in the Alaska governor's mansion.

Seems like a mixed message...
Power is nothing till you use it.

Townsend

quote:
Originally posted by RecycleMichael

quote:
Originally posted by Townsend

I'll give you this one.  The tanning bed thing is going overboard.



That was the issue that told me that she wasn't fully vetted.

I mean, John McCain has had a terrible time with skin cancer. He has had four melanomas removed since 1993.

She goes and has a tanning bed installed in the Alaska governor's mansion.

Seems like a mixed message...



Still though, a tanning bed installed with her own money is not a leadership issue with me.  Now if she was cooking little fluffy animals in it...

FOTD

#5
She better raise her hem line and open some cleavage. The non qualified dim bulb lost 10 points between favorable and unfavorable. People are waking up to this fling. BTW, you do not tan for a tan in Alaska. You do it to adjust to the darkness or for depression. She's both depressing and dark.


But Conan, we know you will be voting for the old, sick, mean, souless white guy over the black guy. Maybe you're hoping she becomes President. Wouldn't put it past you.

FOTD

The devil bets she can't show too much skin. There's a tat hiding in that MILF somewhere.

Crash Daily

#7
Liberal venom spews from their fangs for easily understandable reasons. Mainly, unadulterated fear and desperation. Palin is slightly down in the polls, but she has been falsely maligned, lied about and mischaracterized. It's ugly, nasty, degrading and very short term in effectiveness.

As a matter of fact, it will really come back to bite them, when all these lies filter out in to the remaining public, to be seen for what they really are. Savor the minuscule gains you achieved by these low tactics, while you still can. In the end, they will be the final nail in Obama's "presidential bid" coffin.

You won't make Palin out to be what you are hoping for. She will be seen for who she is and guess what.., who she is far superior to who YOU are. It will all come out in the wash. That's why you hate so much. You know what lies ahead, just as we know what lies are ahead. it wasn't a good move, but it was your only move, other than losing with any shred of dignity. Of course, you're Liberals, what else can we expect.

we vs us

quote:
Originally posted by FOTD

The devil bets she can't show too much skin. There's a tat hiding in that MILF somewhere.



Ok, that's kinda funny.  If she has a tramp stamp I might vote big R this cycle.  

Just saying.

MichaelBates

quote:
Originally posted by we vs us

quote:
Originally posted by FOTD

The devil bets she can't show too much skin. There's a tat hiding in that MILF somewhere.



Ok, that's kinda funny.  If she has a tramp stamp I might vote big R this cycle.  

Just saying.



Not a tramp stamp, but she has the Big Dipper tattooed on her ankle. She lost a bet with her husband over whether incumbent Gov. Frank Murkowski would run for re-election in 2006.

dayzella


quote:


Ok, that's kinda funny.  If she has a tramp stamp I might vote big R this cycle.  

Just saying.



I worked really hard to come up with a gratuitous "Palin has a tattoo and it is of Obama" moment in this post, but I deleted it out of self-respect.

Go, Moore, OK!
[image]http://neatorama.cachefly.net/images/2008-09/obama-tattoo.jpg[/image]

Just sayin'.

pmcalk

I thought women were not suppose to whine?  What in the world did McCain expect when he chose someone whom no one knew anything about???  When you chose an unknown, and then try to develop a false narrative about her, of course people start spreading rumors.  

Most of the smears have been in the blogosphere, and we know how reliable that can be.  I am sure it helps the republican party to create this false sense of outrage.  Where were they when Obama was accused of being a Muslim?  Of not being born in the US?  That his wife used the word "whitey"?

It might help if your party stopped sequestering Palin and had her actually anwser some real questions.
 

Conan71

quote:
Originally posted by FOTD

The devil bets she can't show too much skin. There's a tat hiding in that MILF somewhere.



Think she's got a tramp-stamp, do you?

"the old, sick, mean, souless white guy"????

No I won't be voting for Senator Biden.

"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan

Conan71

quote:
Originally posted by Crash Daily

Liberal venom spews from their fangs for easily understandable reasons. Mainly, unadulterated fear and desperation. Palin is slightly down in the polls, but she has been falsely maligned, lied about and mischaracterized. It's ugly, nasty, degrading and very short term in effectiveness.

As a matter of fact, it will really come back to bite them, when all these lies filter out in to the remaining public, to be seen for what they really are. Savor the minuscule gains you achieved by these low tactics, while you still can. In the end, they will be the final nail in Obama's "presidential bid" coffin.

You won't make Palin out to be what you are hoping for. She will be seen for who she is and guess what.., who she is far superior to who YOU are. It will all come out in the wash. That's why you hate so much. You know what lies ahead, just as we know what lies are ahead. it wasn't a good move, but it was your only move, other than losing with any shred of dignity. Of course, you're Liberals, what else can we expect.



Newness wore off.  Let her go head-to-head with Biden, it will come back up.

"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan

waterboy

Every morning I log on to this forum the preponderence of topics in the political forum are posted by the McCain folks and especially the Palin defenders.

And you ask to leave her alone? Who's kidding who?