News:

Long overdue maintenance happening. See post in the top forum.

Main Menu

Who Replaces Palin On The Ticket?

Started by FOTD, September 26, 2008, 03:01:23 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

FOTD

Yeah. They're cramming her! They're pumping her. They'll find a way to place that wire. She's got a wide canal.....

Wrinkle

This guy could use a major overhaul, for sure:




But, as we all know, after all these years, he's uncontrollable and a chump, bound to lose whatever remaining support the O-man has.


PonderInc

quote:
Originally posted by Wrinkle

Keep it up, you guys are cracking me up.

I've never seen 'progressives' so afraid of a strong woman. And, you can't even see past her good looks.

Makes one wonder why none of this came up while she was clawing her way into the Governor's manson.


Uh...because nobody cares about the governor of Alaska...

Population of Alaska, 2006 Census:
670,053

Population of Tulsa County, 2006 Census:
577,795

We're not afraid of strong women.  We're afraid of powerful incompetence.

Palin is clearly incompetent, and McCain must be, too, if he chose her for VP.

The good thing is that McCain's judgement is so bad that I actually have a shot at Secretary of the Treasury in a McCain administration... I once took Algebra, and I know how to shoot guns and catch/clean fish!

Conan71

quote:
Originally posted by FOTD

Yeah. They're cramming her! They're pumping her. They'll find a way to place that wire. She's got a wide canal.....



Wow, and I thought FB was disgusting.

"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan

RecycleMichael

quote:
Originally posted by FOTD

Yeah. They're cramming her! They're pumping her. They'll find a way to place that wire. She's got a wide canal.....



That is uncalled for...
Power is nothing till you use it.

pmcalk

I have a question--can McCain actually replace Palin at this point?  After all, voting has already started in some states.  Couldn't that prove problematic?
 

iplaw

#51
quote:
Originally posted by PonderInc

quote:
Originally posted by Wrinkle

Keep it up, you guys are cracking me up.

I've never seen 'progressives' so afraid of a strong woman. And, you can't even see past her good looks.

Makes one wonder why none of this came up while she was clawing her way into the Governor's manson.


Uh...because nobody cares about the governor of Alaska...

Population of Alaska, 2006 Census:
670,053

Population of Tulsa County, 2006 Census:
577,795

We're not afraid of strong women.  We're afraid of powerful incompetence.

Palin is clearly incompetent, and McCain must be, too, if he chose her for VP.

The good thing is that McCain's judgement is so bad that I actually have a shot at Secretary of the Treasury in a McCain administration... I once took Algebra, and I know how to shoot guns and catch/clean fish!


I would think they care about Alaska as much as people care about Oklahoma.  Actually, the only people that look down on people in fly-over states like Oklahoma and Alaska are the effetes in the democratic party.

Also, what does it say about you that such an ignorant hack like Palin is so much more successful than you.  You must be a really incompetent, untalented buffoon.

[B)]

azbadpuppy

quote:
Originally posted by Conan71

quote:
Originally posted by azbadpuppy



If the McCain camp Democrats actually cared about the future of this country they would remove her Obama and Biden from the ticket.



There, fixed it for you.

Apparently, you must not be that sharp a lib or you'd know that "progressive" has been in the Democrat vernacular for ages.





I'm not a 'lib'.

My point was that 'progressive' appears to now be the new word to hijack and misuse, much like 'liberal'.
 

Wrinkle

quote:
Originally posted by azbadpuppy

quote:
Originally posted by Conan71

quote:
Originally posted by azbadpuppy



If the McCain camp Democrats actually cared about the future of this country they would remove her Obama and Biden from the ticket.



There, fixed it for you.

Apparently, you must not be that sharp a lib or you'd know that "progressive" has been in the Democrat vernacular for ages.





I'm not a 'lib'.

My point was that 'progressive' appears to now be the new word to hijack and misuse, much like 'liberal'.




Naw, I was pointing out how Democrats, who have been referring to themselves as 'progressive', aren't progressive enough to get by the sexist and stereotypical responses to a female candidate, at least when it's not in their party.

Personally, I'd never use 'progressive' as an adjective when speaking of Democrats.



FOTD

You want labels?

IDIOTS!

That's a good one.

DUMBF*CKISTANIANS!

Progressive? As opposed to reactionaries?

Wrinkle

quote:
Originally posted by pmcalk

I have a question--can McCain actually replace Palin at this point?  After all, voting has already started in some states.  Couldn't that prove problematic?




Ain't gonna happen anyway, stop worrying.

Ya'll will have to come up with another reason to contest the election.

Hoss

quote:
Originally posted by Wrinkle

quote:
Originally posted by pmcalk

I have a question--can McCain actually replace Palin at this point?  After all, voting has already started in some states.  Couldn't that prove problematic?




Ain't gonna happen anyway, stop worrying.

Ya'll We will have to come up with another reason to contest the election.




There, fixed that for ya!

azbadpuppy

quote:
Originally posted by Wrinkle

quote:
Originally posted by azbadpuppy

quote:
Originally posted by Conan71

quote:
Originally posted by azbadpuppy



If the McCain camp Democrats actually cared about the future of this country they would remove her Obama and Biden from the ticket.



There, fixed it for you.

Apparently, you must not be that sharp a lib or you'd know that "progressive" has been in the Democrat vernacular for ages.





I'm not a 'lib'.

My point was that 'progressive' appears to now be the new word to hijack and misuse, much like 'liberal'.




Naw, I was pointing out how Democrats, who have been referring to themselves as 'progressive', aren't progressive enough to get by the sexist and stereotypical responses to a female candidate, at least when it's not in their party.

Personally, I'd never use 'progressive' as an adjective when speaking of Democrats.






I love how Republicans are now crying 'sexism' to any and all criticism of Palin. Explain to me how the criticism or concerns raised over Palin is sexist, or for that matter, any different than the criticism given to Obama or any other candidate. Are you implying she is exempt because she is a woman? Now that would be sexist. Again, misuse of words. Seems to be a theme here.

The woman is clearly out of her league and can't even form a coherent sentence in an interview, yet has the very real possibility of becoming the leader of our country. If you aren't concerned about that then you are seriously delusional.
 

USRufnex

Are these the same Republicans who lambasted Mondale-Ferraro as "Fritz-n-Tits" ???

Methinks the Republicans doth protest too much...




Wrinkle

#59
quote:
Originally posted by USRufnex

Are these the same Republicans....

Methinks the Republicans doth protest too much...




Very much doubt so. Really, try to imagine a Republican using that at all, ever. A phrase like that could only be resurrected after 20 years by 'progressives', probably the same ones who initiated the thing.

For badaz puppy, it's not 'any' or 'all', just much is either that, stereotyped or flat just made up.

If she were as off as you all claim, she'd have never made Governor.

Then again, that doesn't well explain Henry either. And, it is your local party which achieved that, twice.