News:

Long overdue maintenance happening. See post in the top forum.

Main Menu

CHALLENGED (title changed due to bedwetter outcry)

Started by Gaspar, March 25, 2009, 02:18:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Conan71

Are both of you challenging the idea that the Dow hit an historic high of 14,164 in 2007???

Nobody has ignored the fact that the Dow fell of the cliff after it's record high.  However, many people made millions & billions as the market crept up in the Bush years, just as people have made millions & billions since the early March 2009 lows.

To not recognize that is to also ignore those who lost money as the Dow fell from 7900 to 6500 during Obama's first six weeks in office.

A gain is a gain so long as you know when it's time to get out.

"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan

RecycleMichael

I am awed that you seem to know the exact time to get in or out of the stock market.
You make it sound so easy.

I am again amazed by your business knowledge.
Power is nothing till you use it.

Conan71

Quote from: RecycleMichael on July 18, 2012, 04:06:22 PM
I am awed that you seem to know the exact time to get in or out of the stock market.
You make it sound so easy.

I am again amazed by your business knowledge.


Nice way to antagonize and ignore that the Dow was 2000 points higher while Bush was in office and that many people reaped the benefits of it.  I hope it exceeds that under Obama.

I'm referring to the simple principle that people can set their limits for when they think a market is over-heated or they've made sufficient profit and don't want the risk of loss.  I can't possibly tell you when to bail again, but if you got in at a DJIA of 10,000, it went to 14,000 and sank to 12,000, you remain in at your own peril, especially if economic indicators look bleak. 

If someone loaded up in early March 2009, they would be close to doubling out right now if they have shorter term investment objectives.  That's a great gain for not even 3.5 years.  Personally, I think the market is over-valued right now and could be ripe for another downturn, therefore, I'm not putting more money in it right now.  I don't see a great upshot potential at the moment.  My outlook isn't scientific and doesn't hinge on who is currently in the White House, it's simply a personal belief and looking at trends, sort of how I approach Vegas gambling ;)


"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan

Teatownclown

Conan, here's a tip: don't invest in equities. The rest of you can ride any index. :)

Red Arrow

Quote from: RecycleMichael on July 18, 2012, 03:54:56 PM
Dow under Clinton
start 3,310    end 10,587

Dow under Bush
start 10587    end 7,949

Dow under Obama
start 7,949    so far 12,908
 

Red Arrow

Quote from: nathanm on July 18, 2012, 02:42:23 PM
From the NFIB report:



I am looking forward to your explanation of sales between early 1994 and early 2000.
 

nathanm

What is there to explain? A low number means most firms do not consider the lack of sales to be an impediment to their business. A high number means they do.

As I said before, I'd give the tax complaints more weight if there was more variation when tax policy changed.
"Labor is prior to and independent of capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration" --Abraham Lincoln

Red Arrow

Quote from: nathanm on July 18, 2012, 07:28:42 PM
What is there to explain? A low number means most firms do not consider the lack of sales to be an impediment to their business. A high number means they do.

As I said before, I'd give the tax complaints more weight if there was more variation when tax policy changed.

Maybe I am reading your graph wrong.  I would think low sales would lead to low income.  Why would low income not be an impediment to their business?
 

nathanm

Quote from: Red Arrow on July 18, 2012, 08:06:38 PM
Maybe I am reading your graph wrong.  I would think low sales would lead to low income.  Why would low income not be an impediment to their business?

It's a graph of the percentage of businesses in the NFIB survey that cited one of the four graphed responses as their most important problem.
"Labor is prior to and independent of capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration" --Abraham Lincoln

Red Arrow

Quote from: nathanm on July 18, 2012, 09:57:05 PM
It's a graph of the percentage of businesses in the NFIB survey that cited one of the four graphed responses as their most important problem.

OK, that makes more sense now.