News:

Long overdue maintenance happening. See post in the top forum.

Main Menu

Somethings Going On on the Boulder Bridge

Started by brianh, May 04, 2009, 04:34:13 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

brianh

I was out at lunch today and noticed two bulldozer things working on the boulder bridge.  Is this the big fix for it?

hello

 

custosnox

Why? I've been watching this ever since I started working downtown (from being closed to this) and have been wondering what is going on with it.  My guess is that it's no longer safe, but then, so are a large number of other bridges in Oklahoma.

SXSW

The current bridge is unsafe and must be torn down.  It will be replaced by a similar bridge when funds become available.  I seem to think that at least half of the funds have already been appropriated. 
 

TheArtist

Actually, I hope its not going to be a similar bridge at all.  Some initial scenario/renderings I have seen have wide sidewalks, trees, plantings, and lights going on the bridge. Would really also hope there is some sort of sculptural art and architectural interest on the bridge as well.

One neat thing I saw that another city had done, in a very similar situation actually. Was a bridge over a bunch of downtown railroad tracks that connected 2 redeveloping areas. They made it so that there were buildings on either side of the bridge. Walking across it you wouldnt really even know it was a bridge. 
"When you only have two pennies left in the world, buy a loaf of bread with one, and a lily with the other."-Chinese proverb. "Arts a staple. Like bread or wine or a warm coat in winter. Those who think it is a luxury have only a fragment of a mind. Mans spirit grows hungry for art in the same way h

brianh

I thought the original one had side walks, isn't it just like the main street bridge?  I just don't see the sculpture thing being a good idea unless it is in some sort of arch over the bridge.  I wouldn't really like something in the center median or anything like that.  Well actually, if they made a small center median with all the plants, that might be a nice contrast to the plain concrete look all around that area.

cannon_fodder

Street level crossing!  Come on street level crossing!
- - - - - - - - -
I crush grooves.

SXSW

Quote from: cannon_fodder on May 05, 2009, 08:08:53 AM
Street level crossing!  Come on street level crossing!

Why?  I was downtown this past weekend and waited almost 15 min. at the Elgin crossing.  If there's ever a crossing that needs a bridge it's Elgin. 
 

brianh

Would it be too difficult to make it an underground crossing like the Denver one?

carltonplace

The below grade crossings are not inviting to pedestrians. People don't want to walk down into a dark place where they can't see well.

cannon_fodder

Quote from: SXSW on May 05, 2009, 08:12:21 AM
Why?  I was downtown this past weekend and waited almost 15 min. at the Elgin crossing.  If there's ever a crossing that needs a bridge it's Elgin. 

Why didn't you walk one block West to the bridge if you were in a hurry?  Odds are pretty good you headed west after getting to the Brady district anyway.  That option would be available from Boulder also.   Where most of the pedestrians would end up going east after crossing the tracks.

Surface level crossing:

- Far cheaper

- Won't be closed for years in the future

- More inviting for pedestrians

- Less dead zone in the street scape

- less of a footprint (more availability of business lots on either side)
- - - - - - - - -
I crush grooves.

Renaissance

Honestly, those bridges are not conducive to a walkable, inviting downtown.  They simply go too high--you literally can't see the other side when heading down the street.  If you aren't familiar with the area it only increases your uncertainty about where you're headed. 

brianh

I claim complete ignorance in how the train system works, but if it were a street level crossing that would be a nice place for a little passenger train depot. Like just a tiny one, and the bus lets off like three blocks from there.  If that is only a commercial rail line, that seems like a terrible waste of space since we only get a few trains a day.

mjchamplin

I remember the big arching bridges from my childhood. And yes, I just had a flashback of ice-skating in the Williams Center.

Something lower would be nice. More of a visual connection, etc...but I imagine the powers that be don't see that as practical. As far as street-level, there are far too many naysayers who don't like waiting for trains. I think a nice bridge--one that doesn't look like a freeway bridge--would be nice. What's wrong with the original design? http://www.tulsanow.org/forum/index.php?topic=7294.0. The combination of two-lane street and pedestrian promenade makes a lot of sense here.

Red Arrow

Quote from: cannon_fodder on May 05, 2009, 11:18:39 AM


- More inviting for pedestrians


I like trains.  They are awesome pieces of equipment.  I don't like crossing train tracks at grade, especially on foot.