News:

Long overdue maintenance happening. See post in the top forum.

Main Menu

Fuel Cell Vehicles to Drive Climate Change

Started by Wrinkle, May 05, 2009, 09:47:37 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Red Arrow

Quote from: Chicken Little on May 10, 2009, 02:09:01 PM
But your idealogy won't let you entertain some pretty straightforward notions, i.e., policy should make it EASY to get the outcomes you want and HARD to get the outcomes you don't want.

Except for the most broadly defined goals, not everyone will ever agree on a desired outcome.  Those who do agree will most likely disagree on how to get there.  That makes it difficult to make policy,  assuming that policy should define the path at all. Policy on technical matters based on popular consensus rather than actual science can delay meeting the goal.  Both sides of an argument can present experts to prove their side is the one and only true answer.

Makes life interesting.
 

nathanm

One good thing has come from these abiotic oil people. We've found that the mantle does indeed produce useful amounts of hydrogen, which then migrates upward through the rock. Sounds like a much better way of using hydrogen than wasting energy creating it ourselves.
"Labor is prior to and independent of capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration" --Abraham Lincoln

rwarn17588

Quote from: Wrinkle on May 10, 2009, 11:22:07 AM

I'm not so sure, even leaning the other way and your arguments center on my stupidity even though you haven't a clue as to who I am or what my mental capacity may be.

Which of us does that make unreasonable?


Considering that you have on this board espoused some pretty far out there conspiracy theories without a shred of solid evidence, you do have a bit of a credibility problem and therefore might understandably be considered unreasonable.