Michael Bates Out of Urban Tulsa Weekly

[Jitter Free]

This maybe old news, but I didn't know until today.  I picked up the UTW today and noticed that Bates didn't have an article in the paper.  I went to his website to see if anything was up and here is what it said:


Urban Tulsa Weekly last column
By Michael Bates on May 28, 2009 12:34 PM | Permalink | Comments (12) | TrackBacks (0)
This week in Urban Tulsa Weekly, I've covered a variety of topics: First Presbyterian Church's exciting plans to replace a surface parking lot with a beautiful new addition to their downtown complex, whether the BOK Center should charge a per-ticket fee to cover Tulsa Police Department overtime relating to event nights, and a few parting thoughts on the PLANiTULSA process.

That's right: parting thoughts. This issue contains my last column for UTW, at least for now.

I had written a brief farewell at the end of the column, but it was edited out, presumably for space reasons, so I'll post it here:

And with that I'll say goodbye for now. I'm grateful for the opportunity to have been part of the UTW team for almost four years. Many thanks to the UTW readers who took time to read my words, who wrote in with praise and with criticism, and who voted my blog, batesline.com, Absolute Best of Tulsa two years in a row. Best wishes for continued success to the staff, management, and advertisers of Urban Tulsa Weekly.I'm sad to be leaving but pleased to have made a significant contribution to UTW and, I hope, to the public debate. By my count, starting with the September 15-21, 2005, issue, I produced 194 weekly columns -- without a break -- plus several extra op-eds, cover stories on Tulsa bloggers, the 2006 city election, the history of our plans for the Arkansas River, and PLANiTULSA, and a few other feature stories and news items, and even a handful of photographs.

In the process, I've had the pleasure of working with some very creative and talented people, attended a dozen or so editorial meetings, met a lot of interesting Tulsans in many walks of life, spent a lot of time at the Coffee House on Cherry Street and Shades of Brown, and even handed out candy in the Boo-Ha-Ha parade. It's been fun, and there's a lot I'll miss about it.

It's no small feat to start an independent weekly paper and to keep it going for 18 years, and Keith Skrzypczak and his wife Julie (who oversees the paper's operations) are to be admired for their achievement. I'm thankful, too, that Tulsa's alt-weekly truly is an editorial alternative to the daily paper, publishing free-market and pro-life voices alongside the left-wing columnists and cartoonists more typical of the alternative press.

So why will I no longer be writing for UTW?

Recently UTW established a "freelancer's agreement," a standard contract for all freelance contributors, including writers and photographers. The agreement includes a "work made for hire" provision, which means that UTW would own all rights, including the copyright, to anything I submit for publication during the term of the agreement.

For many freelancers, that won't be a cause for concern, but to borrow a phrase from Roscoe Turner, "I've got a problem with that." By giving up all my rights, I could be setting up problems down the road should I want to incorporate into future projects any of the material I would write under the agreement.

In my weekly column, I've researched and analyzed current local issues and tried to put them into historical and political perspective. I've discussed urban design and planning concepts used elsewhere and applied them to Tulsa's circumstances. Beyond the immediate value of a column to the public conversation in the week it's published, I think there's some long-term value as well.

That value might take any number of forms, such as a book or a documentary on the history of Tulsa in the early 21st century or on Tulsa's post-World War II transformation. Such a project is many years in the future, I suspect, which is all the more reason for me to avoid agreeing to something now that creates obstacles for me in a decade or two. What if UTW is sold to a chain of weeklies or goes out of business? (God forbid on both hypotheticals.) Those possibilities seem very remote today, but a lot can happen in 10 or 20 years, and if they happened, who would own the rights to my work under the agreement? Would I be able to get permission to use my own work? Who knows?

At the very least, I would want to continue to retain enough rights for anything I write to be able to keep it accessible on the web.

There are no hard feelings here. UTW is doing what it deems prudent in requiring a standard agreement from all freelancers. I'm doing what I deem prudent by choosing not to submit work under those terms.

I will continue to post news and vent my opinions here at BatesLine on a fairly regular basis, along with interesting links (on the left side of the homepage) and the occasional tweet on Twitter. (My latest 10 tweets can be found on the right side of the BatesLine homepage.)

As for long-form commentary, I'm exploring some possibilities, but for the immediate future I will be using my now-free Sunday afternoons and evenings to catch up on chores around the house. I've been thinking about doing a podcast. (If that's of interest to you, let me know. I'm not much of a podcast listener myself, but I know many people prefer it to reading articles online.)

I wish the staff, management, and ownership of Urban Tulsa Weekly all the best for the future.

[ILUVTulsa]

Thanks Bates, fo da heads-up.  I wouldn't write for UTW under those conditions either.

[Limabean]

When Michael bates left Urban Tulsa, we lost our last chance at transparent government.

[FOTD]

When Michael bates left Urban Tulsa, we lost our last chance at transparent government.

[Conan71]

I think Bates did a great job shining the light on some local issues that didn't turn out to be what they seemed.  Government needs critics like Bates to keep them honest and to keep a pulse on what the opposition thinks.

Regardless of whether or not I agreed with Bates week-to-week, I could always count on a well-thought out well-reasoned column.  (Okay so the research was lacking in a column or two  )  UTW doesn't look the same w/o his work in it anymore.

He's also one of the best walking Tulsa encyclopedias we have.

[PonderInc]

Thanks, Michael, for your many terrific articles about urban design issues, historic preservation, and the best, consistent, in-depth coverage of PLANiTULSA I've seen.  I will miss reading your articles in the UT.

It's a shame, b/c I think Tulsa needs more people thinking and talking about urban design, neighborhoods, planning, etc. 

Most folks can "feel" the difference between a well-built physical environment, and a crappy one...but it helps to have someone who can put it into words.  Who can help us understand what makes great cities, streets and neighborhoods "tick."   And who can explain how great places become great.  (Always nice to read an article that quotes Jane Jacobs... ) 

Thanks again, and I hope you'll continue to cover these topics on your blog.