News:

Long overdue maintenance happening. See post in the top forum.

Main Menu

Today is the day for Medicare

Started by Gaspar, March 01, 2010, 07:48:08 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

guido911

Quote from: we vs us on March 02, 2010, 02:04:34 PM

He's single-handedly branding the GOP as the party that refuses to help regular Americans.   I'll be interested to see at what point the Republican leadership decides that that is NOT a winning message.

What is a "regular American". First, it seems to me that by Bunning demanding that our government pay for things with money it has (and not just keep borrowing indefinitely) is just what "regular Americans" have to do every damned day. Second, those persons most affected by this action are how many? A few hundred thousand out of a nation of 300 million? Are those your idea of "regular Americans"? Oh I know what you mean, "regular Americans" are those that are unemployed right now and not paying taxes. It's not the small business owners, those working two-three part time jobs and refusing to take government hand outs, or those that do not live beyond their means. Makes sense.
Someone get Hoss a pacifier.

Hoss

Quote from: guido911 on March 02, 2010, 04:55:32 PM
What is a "regular American". First, it seems to me that by Bunning demanding that our government pay for things with money it has (and not just keep borrowing indefinitely) is just what "regular Americans" have to do every damned day. Second, those persons most affected by this action are how many? A few hundred thousand out of a nation of 300 million? Are those your idea of "regular Americans"? Oh I know what you mean, "regular Americans" are those that are unemployed right now and not paying taxes. It's not the small business owners, those working two-three part time jobs and refusing to take government hand outs, or those that do not live beyond their means. Makes sense.

Looks like Bunning caved...

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/03/02/jobless.benefits.bill/index.html?hpt=T3

rwarn17588

Quote from: guido911 on March 02, 2010, 04:55:32 PM
First, it seems to me that by Bunning demanding that our government pay for things with money it has (and not just keep borrowing indefinitely) is just what "regular Americans" have to do every damned day.


That's rich. Bunning was a member of the Republican-controlled Senate that let the pay-as-you-go spending law expire in 2002. That law helped President Clinton and the Congress get control of spending during the 1990s and led to a budget surplus.

Guess what current commander-in-chief wants the law reinstated?

nathanm

Quote from: guido911 on March 02, 2010, 04:55:32 PM
those that do not live beyond their means.
I may live well within my means at the moment, but if I were to lose my job, there would be a nice divide by zero error that would result in your statement becoming meaningless. I guess I could live within my means if that happened. I could always put a bullet in my brain.

Wait, no. Bullets cost money. OK, I guess I could repeatedly bash myself in the skull with a rock until I expired. Surely that wouldn't cost anything.  ::)
"Labor is prior to and independent of capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration" --Abraham Lincoln

guido911

#19
Quote from: rwarn17588 on March 02, 2010, 09:17:38 PM
That's rich. Bunning was a member of the Republican-controlled Senate that let the pay-as-you-go spending law expire in 2002. That law helped President Clinton and the Congress get control of spending during the 1990s and led to a budget surplus.

Guess what current commander-in-chief wants the law reinstated?

No, this is rich. I thought "pay as you go" passed very recently.

Here is a humorous take on folks like you going after Bunning.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/03/01/EDEV1C930S.DTL

Another rw epic FAIL!
Someone get Hoss a pacifier.

Hoss

Ha, this is funny.  And before you tightie-righties get your panties in a bunch about my source, I got it before this from Wolf Blitzer on CNN yesterday.

Bunning flips the bird at ABC's Jonathan Karl.  This happened right before his tirade about the elevator he was on being a 'senators only' elevator.

http://www.politicususa.com/en/jim-bunning-bird-ab

Red Arrow

From the clips I saw of the press badgering Bunning, JK is probably lucky the bird is all he got.
 

Hoss

Quote from: Red Arrow on March 03, 2010, 12:43:37 PM
From the clips I saw of the press badgering Bunning, JK is probably lucky the bird is all he got.

Yeah, because anything more would be 'unprofessional'?  Wow.

Let's keep in mind here about the fact that the republicans during the ramp up to the Iraq war didn't give a squat about this pay-as-you-go scheme.  Smacks of double-standard here.  And somehow they found a way to keep the war off the budget.

rwarn17588

Quote from: Hoss on March 03, 2010, 01:20:53 PM
Yeah, because anything more would be 'unprofessional'?  Wow.


Probably learned his manners from "FU, you POS" guido.  :D

Gaspar

Quote from: rwarn17588 on March 03, 2010, 04:16:34 PM
Probably learned his manners from "FU, you POS" guido.  :D

or FU Rahm.


More itsy-bitsy-spider.  Seems to be a theme in the admin.
When attacked by a mob of clowns, always go for the juggler.

Hoss

Wow, for all the hand-wringing Bunning and his party was doing regarding this, the last time the PAYGO bill was brought to a vote, guess what his was?

NO.

What a friggin' hypocrite.  And even more so than the average politician.  Granted there were several Dems that did vote for this, but to hold up a bill and demand it be paid for first after voting no the Pay As You Go previously.  Can some republicans be so damned stupid?