News:

Long overdue maintenance happening. See post in the top forum.

Main Menu

Proposed law would block judges from using sharia law and international law

Started by jamesrage, June 14, 2010, 09:02:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Cats Cats Cats

I like the idea of seeing what has happened elsewhere and what loopholes laws created.  Instead of doing the same broken crap somebody else did and then have to fix it.

guido911

Quote from: rwarn17588 on June 14, 2010, 09:09:29 PM
Unreasoning paranoia at its finest by jamesimpotentrage.

Do you really think any Oklahoma judge is going to cite sharia law in any case?
Well there is this (don't know the veracity of the source though):

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/07/sharia-in-new-jersey-muslim-husband-rapes-wife-judge-sees-no-sexual-assault-because-husbands-religio.html
Someone get Hoss a pacifier.

nathanm

Quote from: guido911 on July 26, 2010, 10:44:36 AM
Well there is this (don't know the veracity of the source though):

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/07/sharia-in-new-jersey-muslim-husband-rapes-wife-judge-sees-no-sexual-assault-because-husbands-religio.html
Presuming your source is accurate, given that the idiotic decision (which has nothing to do with sharia per se, only religious custom in general) was overturned on appeal, I think we have nothing to worry about, despite the tone of the article.
"Labor is prior to and independent of capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration" --Abraham Lincoln

heironymouspasparagus

Guido,
I am begging you... PLEASE... REALLY... cite an example or two of Oklahoma cases where foreign or sharia law was cited as precedent or basis for a ruling!  Something that can be researched and actually seen!

I anxiously await!




"So he brandished a gun, never shot anyone or anything right?"  --TeeDub, 17 Feb 2018.

I don't share my thoughts because I think it will change the minds of people who think differently.  I share my thoughts to show the people who already think like me that they are not alone.

heironymouspasparagus

Here is what Ginsburg actually said about the topic, just in case anyone wants the un-Fox-edited version.



Justice Ginsburg said the controversy was based on the misunderstanding that citing a foreign precedent means the court considers itself bound by foreign law as opposed to merely being influenced by such power as its reasoning holds.

"Why shouldn't we look to the wisdom of a judge from abroad with at least as much ease as we would read a law review article written by a professor?" she asked.
"So he brandished a gun, never shot anyone or anything right?"  --TeeDub, 17 Feb 2018.

I don't share my thoughts because I think it will change the minds of people who think differently.  I share my thoughts to show the people who already think like me that they are not alone.

guido911

Quote from: heironymouspasparagus on July 26, 2010, 08:56:44 PM
Guido,
I am begging you... PLEASE... REALLY... cite an example or two of Oklahoma cases where foreign or sharia law was cited as precedent or basis for a ruling!  Something that can be researched and actually seen!

I anxiously await!






I think before you go off you should perhaps, just perhaps, look through this thread and see my comments.
Someone get Hoss a pacifier.

Red Arrow

Quote from: guido911 on July 27, 2010, 04:21:37 PM
I think before you go off you should perhaps, just perhaps, look through this thread and see my comments.

You're no fun.
 

heironymouspasparagus

#37
Ahhhh....irony..... yes, the joys of the lack of nuance in text.  Sorry.
And yes, I jumped right over your next comments.


And yeah...that's no fun!




"So he brandished a gun, never shot anyone or anything right?"  --TeeDub, 17 Feb 2018.

I don't share my thoughts because I think it will change the minds of people who think differently.  I share my thoughts to show the people who already think like me that they are not alone.

heironymouspasparagus

Off on a tangent;
The Religious Freedom Act reads like one of those "feel good", touchy-feely sitting around the campfire singing Kumbaya things that doesn't have much real meaning.  Or can be whatever the reader wants it to mean.

But it leaves the definition of "compelling governmental interest" and "least restrictive means" to the courts.

I guess that's how all those lawyers in the legislature provides an ongoing revenue stream of litigation and political turmoil.  Turmoil creates commotion which creates opportunity for income.

It's a relief to know neither Sharia nor international law will be used to determine these critical points.

Too bad this state wastes so much time with stuff like that.

"So he brandished a gun, never shot anyone or anything right?"  --TeeDub, 17 Feb 2018.

I don't share my thoughts because I think it will change the minds of people who think differently.  I share my thoughts to show the people who already think like me that they are not alone.

jamesrage

Quote from: guido911 on July 26, 2010, 10:44:36 AM
Well there is this (don't know the veracity of the source though):

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/07/sharia-in-new-jersey-muslim-husband-rapes-wife-judge-sees-no-sexual-assault-because-husbands-religio.html

Amazing how people think "oh that could never happen here". The fact there are judges like Joseph Charles in New Jersey or a Ruth Bader Ginsburg on on the supreme court proves that we have judges that will cite foreign and religious laws. Luckily for Oklahoma most of the liberals are those who populate this forum, but we could end up getting a liberal judge like that in Oklahoma one.
___________________________________________________________________________
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those

jamesrage

Quote from: heironymouspasparagus on July 26, 2010, 08:56:44 PM
Guido,
I am begging you... PLEASE... REALLY... cite an example or two of Oklahoma cases where foreign or sharia law was cited as precedent or basis for a ruling!  Something that can be researched and actually seen!

I anxiously await!






Why do we have to wait for something to happen here before we can make a law against it? Where is the logic in that? I realize that Oklahoma is probably one of the most conservative states in the country but a liberal judge could weasel his way in.
___________________________________________________________________________
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those

rwarn17588

Quote from: jamesrage on August 08, 2010, 07:41:06 PM
Why do we have to wait for something to happen here before we can make a law against it?


And why should we wait to purchase our magic shields in case the unicorn with its killer death ray comes to attack us?  ::)

Red Arrow

Quote from: rwarn17588 on August 08, 2010, 08:13:03 PM
And why should we wait to purchase our magic shields in case the unicorn with its killer death ray comes to attack us?  ::)

Every place I have called has been out of stock.  Do you have a source with some in stock?     ;D
 

JeffM

Quote from: rwarn17588 on August 08, 2010, 08:13:03 PM
And why should we wait to purchase our magic shields in case the unicorn with its killer death ray comes to attack us?  ::)

Did someone say "unicorn" ?
"Shun the nonbeliever... shun..... shun...."  :P

Bring back the Tulsa Roughnecks!.... JeffM is now TulsaRufnex....  http://www.tulsaroughnecks.com

custosnox

Quote from: JeffM on August 09, 2010, 12:30:48 AM
Did someone say "unicorn" ?
"Shun the nonbeliever... shun..... shun...."  :P


Damn you, you stole three and a half minutes of my life.