News:

Long overdue maintenance happening. See post in the top forum.

Main Menu

Thoughts?

Started by jacobi, April 11, 2012, 01:26:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

jacobi

http://online.wsj.com/​article/​SB1000142405270230407200457​7323754019227394.htm

Now who can I convince that this is true?  Samson? Williams Co.? Bank of Oklahoma?

ἐγώ ἐλεεινότερος πάντων ἀνθρώπων εἰμί

Conan71

"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan

Gaspar

Those were my thoughts too.
When attacked by a mob of clowns, always go for the juggler.

jacobi

I repaired the link.
ἐγώ ἐλεεινότερος πάντων ἀνθρώπων εἰμί

AquaMan

onward...through the fog

jacobi

Grrr, I I even checked it with a click-through last time.  I'll just cut and paste the thing.  It's from the WSJ online. 


Wealth or Waste? Rethinking the Value of a Business Major

Undergraduate business majors are a dime a dozen on many college campuses. But according to some, they may be worth even less.

More than 20% of U.S. undergraduates are business majors, nearly double the next most common major, social sciences and history.

The proportion has held relatively steady for the past 30 years, but now faculty members, school administrators and corporate recruiters are questioning the value of a business degree at the undergraduate level.

The biggest complaint: The undergraduate degrees focus too much on the nuts and bolts of finance and accounting and don't develop enough critical thinking and problem-solving skills through long essays, in-class debates and other hallmarks of liberal-arts courses.

Companies say they need flexible thinkers with innovative ideas and a broad knowledge base derived from exposure to multiple disciplines. And while most recruiters don't outright avoid business majors, companies in consulting, technology and even finance say they're looking for candidates with a broader academic background.


William Sullivan, co-author of "Rethinking Undergraduate Business Education: Liberal Learning for the Profession," says the divide between business and liberal-arts offerings, however unintentional, has hurt students, who see their business instruction as "isolated" from other disciplines.

Schools are taking the hint. The business schools at George Washington University, Georgetown University, Santa Clara University and others are tweaking their undergraduate business curricula in an attempt to better integrate lessons on history, ethics and writing into courses about finance and marketing.


Top College Degrees

Bachelor's awarded by field for the 2008-09 academic year
Business: 347,985, or 21.7%
Social sciences and history: 168,500, or 10.5%
Health professions and related clinical sciences: 120,488, or 7.5%
Education: 101,708, or 6.4%
Psychology: 94,271, or 5.9%
Visual and performing arts: 89,140, or 5.6%
Source: National Center for Education Studies.
Along with more than 20 other U.S. and European business schools, those institutions met last month at George Washington for a conference to discuss ways to better integrate a liberal-arts education into the business curriculum. It was organized by the Aspen Institute, a nonprofit group with an arm that studies management education and society. Other participants included Franklin & Marshall College, Babson College and Esade, a business and law school at Barcelona's Ramon Llull University.

Doug Guthrie, dean of the George Washington University School of Business, is planning to draw on expertise in the university's psychology and philosophy departments to teach business ethics and he'll seek help from the engineering program to address sustainability. He expects to introduce the new curriculum, which will also include a core course on business and society, in the fall.

Such changes should appease recruiters, who have been seeking well-rounded candidates from other disciplines, such as English, economics and engineering. Even financial companies say those students often have sharp critical-thinking skills and problem-solving techniques that business majors sometimes lack.

"Firms are looking for talent. They're not looking for content knowledge, per se," says Scott Rostan, founder of Training the Street Inc., which provides financial training courses for new hires at a number of investment banks. "They're not hiring someone just because they took an M&A class."

Business degrees have been offered since at least the 1800s, but they were often considered vocational programs. Some experts argue that the programs belong at trade schools and that students should use their undergraduate years to learn something about the world before heading to business school for an M.B.A.

Next fall, the University of Denver's Daniels College of Business will provide a required course to teach first-year students how to view business issues in a global context. The class, being piloted this spring, will have instruction in business history, ethics, social responsibility, sustainability and other subjects.

Introducing such concepts early in students' academic careers should help them "connect the dots," says Daniel Connolly, associate dean for undergraduate programs at the business school.

Even some European schools, which have encouraged a narrow focus in college studies historically, are looking to expand.

"Education is more than technical learning," says Alfred Vernis, director of university programs at Esade. He says the humanities need to be "embedded" in the rest of the program. Esade expects to unveil a new undergraduate business curriculum for the fall of 2013.

Are schools going far enough? It's too early to tell, many recruiters say. But in any case companies will probably continue to look at nonbusiness students to ensure a diverse pool.

Facebook Inc., a hot destination for many college graduates, doesn't recruit based on a particular major. "It's not about what you have or haven't studied," says Kristen Clemmer Meeks, a recruiting manager at the social-media company. She says some jobs require more analytical know-how, though new hires for those teams can come from business, economics, math or other programs.

Margaret Copete is director of North America campus recruiting at consultancy Booz & Co., which increased undergraduate hiring 59% this academic year. She says that about a third of the newest class studied business in school, and the rest majored in subjects including math, nursing and economics. At the undergraduate level, Ms. Copete says, she's looking for students with "the basic building blocks" who can be trained "to be great consultants."

Many schools already require students to take at least some courses outside their business major. Jed Somers, a 22-year-old senior at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School, says that while much of his schedule was filled with Wharton-specific requirements, he enrolled in Brazilian drumming and art history, among other courses. (Wharton says about half of its students' courses are in the liberal arts.)

Mr. Somers will begin a job in fixed-income index product sales at Barclays Capital in July. He believes that studying business helped him secure the position because it showed he's "passionate" about the field.

Tara Udut, the head of campus recruitment for the Americas at Barclays, says that about half the bank's new analyst hires in recent years have come from business, finance, economics or accounting but that "students from nonfinance backgrounds bring a valuable perspective." Still, she says, applicants from the liberal arts often need to "undertake extra due diligence on the industry."

As said above, I just need to convince someone that this is true.  :-\
ἐγώ ἐλεεινότερος πάντων ἀνθρώπων εἰμί

Red Arrow

Even in undergraduate Engineering school, I had to take two English Lit courses, US History and Delaware History (Univ of Del is a state school), and a couple of others as electives that I don't remember.  It was part of going to college.  I grumbled since I almost always carried 18 hrs per semester, some with a LOT of work outside the class room, but in the long run it didn't hurt me.
 

jacobi

QuoteEven in undergraduate Engineering school, I had to take two English Lit courses, US History and Delaware History (Univ of Del is a state school), and a couple of others as electives that I don't remember.  It was part of going to college.  I grumbled since I almost always carried 18 hrs per semester, some with a LOT of work outside the class room, but in the long run it didn't hurt me.

And this is still true to some extent.  People are no longer required to take Lit classes, just composition courses.  There are young men and women roaming our state universities who feel that the only reason to go to university is to increase their earning potential.  While that is part of getting a degree, when one has that attitude, all one does is crank out assignments without learning anything.  Part of the reason why we as taxpayers fund universities, presumably, is to produce a better educated population, not just more efficient producers and consumers.

It has been lamented on here (I can't remember where) that business owners have scrapped plush budgets for shoestring ones; That owners listen to accountants and not architects when building new digs.  Look at the buildings built during our fair city's golden age: The Philtower, the Philcade etc. They were not just meant to display the wealth of their owner.  They were built with a sense of civic pride and beauty.  It seems with the rise of the bottom-line-only crowd came a confluence of ugly buildings (or parking lots) and businesses indifferent, not only to their customer base, but to their community at large.

As someone who studies and teaches philosophy, I think everyone should take Logic and Critical Thinking and Ethics.

/Sermon
ἐγώ ἐλεεινότερος πάντων ἀνθρώπων εἰμί

nathanm

Quote from: jacobi on April 11, 2012, 11:48:41 PM
It has been lamented on here (I can't remember where) that business owners have scrapped plush budgets for shoestring ones; That owners listen to accountants and not architects when building new digs.  Look at the buildings built during our fair city's golden age: The Philtower, the Philcade etc. They were not just meant to display the wealth of their owner.  They were built with a sense of civic pride and beauty.  It seems with the rise of the bottom-line-only crowd came a confluence of ugly buildings (or parking lots) and businesses indifferent, not only to their customer base, but to their community at large.

Last night I happened across an interview of Ayn Rand by Mike Wallace on Youtube. It provides a fairly clear and cogent explanation of how this came to be directly from the high priestess of the modern right. It's almost frightening how rapidly the prevailing morality of a society can be changed so rapidly.
"Labor is prior to and independent of capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration" --Abraham Lincoln

Teatownclown

Jacobi, banksters rule.

Breadburner

Back to normal once President Dingleberry is gone.....
 

Hoss

Quote from: Breadburner on April 12, 2012, 08:37:57 AM
Back to normal once President Dingleberry is gone.....

Bush IS gone..

;D

Patrick

So I have an undergraduate degree in business and a masters in business from TU.  After the undergraduate degree, I went to work for a large regional bank in a fairly prominent training program.  I waited about four years before going back to school at night while working to get my MBA.

While I always lament that I don't have an engineering degree, the reality is that if I had an undergraduate engineering degree, I wouldn't be in a business management roll today, which is where I wanted to be.  Sure, I could have done the MBA right after the undergraduate engineering degree, but in my experience, the MBA is less valuable when you don't have relevant work experience prior to starting the classwork.  What happens is you have someone fresh out of college with all of this education - undergrad and graduate degrees in business or engineering and business - but they have no real work experience.  While you will certainly get paid more vs. undergraduate degree only, it won't be nearly as much as if you had a few years experience under your belt.

If you waited a few years to get your MBA and went to work after your undergrad engineering degree, you wouldn't be in a business roll.  There is a guy here at work that is stuck as an engineer despite waiting a few years after undergrad and getting his MBA.  His value is as an engineer.  And while he could certainly run our engineering department one day, I'm not sure he is CFO or CEO material, which is what I am shooting for.

Anyways, that is my opinion. :)  The best option is a dual degree in Business-Finance and in engineering.  Work in a business setting for a few years and then get an MBA.  Alternatively, another great option if you enjoy healthcare is to double-major in business and nursing, work at a hospital for awhile, then get your MBA.  That is an excellent degree combination.

Conan71

A business degree is a great catch-all though for people who simply want to say they have a degree.  Let's face it, most people with a baccalaureate degree will learn more their first year on the job than they did the previous four years.

Some interesting quips I've heard over the years about certain degree programs:

"A marketing degree to go into sales?  Either you can sell or you can't.  There's no degree program which will make you a great professional sales person!"

"The only thing I learned from my MBA program at TU was 'collect fast and pay slow'."

"A business degree and 50 cents will buy you a cup of coffee on any street corner."

"My first thought when I walked off the stage: 'With a handshake and conferring of a diploma, I'm now amongst the ranks of the unemployed.'"
"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan