Mitt Romney... 47 percent will vote for Obama "no matter what"

[erfalf]

Hoss, try clicking through on the links of my post. Unless you can prove that the state docs were doctored I guess.

Look, I could find reasons to discount pretty much every bit of information out there. If you want to just ignore anything that doesn't fit in with your world view that's fine I guess.

[Hoss]

Hoss, try clicking through on the links of my post. Unless you can prove that the state docs were doctored I guess.

Look, I could find reasons to discount pretty much every bit of information out there. If you want to just ignore anything that doesn't fit in with your world view that's fine I guess.

Hmm...that sounds like a familiar position to take, doesn't it?....

[Hoss]

You are a doofus. Did you ever read the article? Did you read the CNN article? Did you watch the CNN video? lol,..And where's your damned source contradicting the NRO article? Or, are you expecting to find a media source out there you like that is going to portray Obama negatively? Tell me, which one would that be.

Those non-biased sources, like you, are so nuzzled up in Obama grundle that you refuse to even look at what really happened in Illinois. By the way, I have family there and they remember the story unfolding just as it was reported in the NRO...but you probably know more.  

Tick tock...tick tock.

Love how a post about Mitt RMoney turns around and becomes an Obama bashing thread.

The wheels are coming off...they have been for a week.  Now the frame is wobbling.

[Hoss]

[guido911]

Tick tock...tick tock.

Love how a post about Mitt RMoney turns around and becomes an Obama bashing thread.

The wheels are coming off...they have been for a week.  Now the frame is wobbling.

Love how four U.S. department officials are murdered in Libya and you and media want to talk about Romney. See how that works Hoss? I sometimes wonder why I ever engage you. I have had chats with my 6 year old that are more productive than listening to your mindless, zombie-like devotion to Obama.

And I take it you haven't read the CNN cites as well since you changed the subject. Sheesh. Even RM knows Obama lies.

Finally, since you are now back to criticizing thread content, are you back to forum policing again?

Here ya go:


edit.

[Hoss]

Love how four U.S. department officials are murdered in Libya and you and media want to talk about Romney. See how that works Hoss? I sometimes wonder why I ever engage you. I have had chats with my 6 year old that are more productive than listening to your mindless, zombie-like devotion to Obama.

And I take it you haven't read the CNN cites as well since you changed the subject. Sheesh. Even RM knows Obama lies.

Finally, since you are not criticizing thread content, are you back to forum policing again?

Here ya go:

Unfortunately, Tony, you hear what you want to hear.  I have never once endorsed Obama for this campaign.  I do however, think Mittens is a terrible choice.  I'd rather not vote than vote for the Romney trainwreck.

But if it makes you sleep a little better at night calling me a 6 year old and calling me forum police, please do so.  While I watch this campaign unravel, I'll be snickering all the way...knowing our resident ad-hominem expert gets his release...

[Red Arrow]

I am better off than I was 4 years ago.
I checked my 401k.  

You must be contributing faster than it is losing market value.  Are you a closet 1%er?

[Hoss]

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/18/opinion/brooks-thurston-howell-romney.html

Wow, the piling on continues...

[erfalf]

Unfortunately, Tony, you hear what you want to hear.  I have never once endorsed Obama for this campaign.  I do however, think Mittens is a terrible choice.  I'd rather not vote than vote for the Romney trainwreck.

But if it makes you sleep a little better at night calling me a 6 year old and calling me forum police, please do so.  While I watch this campaign unravel, I'll be snickering all the way...knowing our resident ad-hominem expert gets his release...

You may not endorse Obama, but you have never once failed to deflect (attempt) criticism. I think they are both terrible choices, but what does that leave me with?

During the '08 campaigns, I recall saying that they both sucked as well, it's just that one was going to drive us to the poor house in a Corvette (appropriate now, don't you think) instead of an old beater, getting us there much quicker. Same applies for this election. Romney has shown propensity to be the "big government" type. I think this election is so difficult for him because he thinks he needs to be something that he's not, a conservative. Which just further makes me believe that political parties are a ruse to keep us interested, and that generally both parties (in private) are working towards the same things.

[erfalf]

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/18/opinion/brooks-thurston-howell-romney.html

Wow, the piling on continues...

Was this supposed to be one of those instances of hating on their own? Because it's pretty funny.

[Hoss]

You may not endorse Obama, but you have never once failed to deflect (attempt) criticism. I think they are both terrible choices, but what does that leave me with?

During the '08 campaigns, I recall saying that they both sucked as well, it's just that one was going to drive us to the poor house in a Corvette (appropriate now, don't you think) instead of an old beater, getting us there much quicker. Same applies for this election. Romney has shown propensity to be the "big government" type. I think this election is so difficult for him because he thinks he needs to be something that he's not, a conservative. Which just further makes me believe that political parties are a ruse to keep us interested, and that generally both parties (in private) are working towards the same things.

If you don't think he's conservative, then why do you say you'll vote for him?

My criticisms of Obama are plenty.  Not closing Guantanamo is the biggest.  Allowing warrantless wire-tapping is another.  It is, however, difficult to criticize a President when bill after bill sits in Congress languishing because the Republicans number one priority was to ensure he did not have a second term.  Not doing the business of their constituents.  Where is the rage there?

Not difficult to like your guy when he had a rubberstamp Congress last time out.

[ZYX]

And surprisingly enough, that number (though it changes whenever it's convenient for your argument) speaks more to the level of poverty in this country since that 47% or 45% or 42% or 40% don't have enough income to owe any federal taxes. You imply that they're freeloading on the taxpayers.  I suggest you spend a month or two living on food stamps and government cheese.

Current electoral vote forecast:305/232

I have seen firsthand severe abuse of government programs designed to help people make ends meet in times of hardship. It's ridiculous that people are content living that way, being fully supported by others, but trust me, it happens.

[Conan71]

If you don't think he's conservative, then why do you say you'll vote for him?

My criticisms of Obama are plenty.  Not closing Guantanamo is the biggest.  Allowing warrantless wire-tapping is another.  It is, however, difficult to criticize a President when bill after bill sits in Congress languishing because the Republicans number one priority was to ensure he did not have a second term.  Not doing the business of their constituents.  Where is the rage there?

Not difficult to like your guy when he had a rubberstamp Congress last time out.

How do the 23 million unemployed or under-employed, $4 a gallon gas, roughly $7 trillion more in debt (and remember whomever is in the WH next year inherits even more debt from this fiscal year and budget, not forcing the Senate to approve a budget, and a "healthcare overhaul" which does nothing more than shift payment points while incurring more debt for the gov't sit with you?

What about Obama's presidency is not a train wreck?

[Conan71]

I am better off than I was 4 years ago.
I checked my 401k.  

So are the "dooshbags" like Romney, Gates, Buffet and other tycoons who get to only pay 15% on those gains.

They really should love Obama since he hasn't had the cajones to restructure the tax code.  He's made a great bogeyman out of the rich, but he's done absolutely nothing about it other than chatter.  He had both houses until January of 2011, as well as the ability to allow the Bush tax cuts to sunset so no excuses.

[guido911]

You may not endorse Obama, but you have never once failed to deflect (attempt) criticism.

We have a winner. Hoss is being a typical bleacher bum. Shouting at one side when they stumble, and sure as sh!t quiet when his side fails. Or, in this case, pretends his side is not Obama. It's a joke. What's not funny, is that he all but begged for source citations on Obama's "Born Alive" votes, then WE give them to him, then he runs down the cites. When that doesn't work because at least CNN was cited, he then b!tches that we are now attacking Obama in a Romney thread. Never once by the way refuting the point that Obama voted to let infants who are born alive die rather than jeopardize Roe v. Wade.

Incidentally, this is the post where I found that Roe mentioned, can't seem to recall who wrote it though...

How is that stance radical?  Guess you've never heard of Roe v Wade?  It IS the law of the land.

On topic, it seems that this entire thread was about Romney attempting to divide up society and taking sides. That is precisely what we have been seeing in this country for the past several years. Be it the tea party or the pee party, haves vs. have nots, the fact is that class warfare is in full swing. Why are people shocked that Romney has joined in?