News:

Long overdue maintenance happening. See post in the top forum.

Main Menu

How Did TNF Members Vote On Bridenstine Vs. Olson

Started by Conan71, November 06, 2012, 03:51:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Who did you vote for as the District 1 Representative

Jim Bridenstine
3 (13.6%)
John Olson
17 (77.3%)
Craig Allen
2 (9.1%)

Total Members Voted: 22

nathanm

Quote from: Townsend on November 06, 2012, 09:54:19 PM
His acceptance call to war on the federal government was a bucket of crazy.

At least he'll fit right in.
"Labor is prior to and independent of capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration" --Abraham Lincoln

carltonplace

His victory speach made me want to duck under the sofa. Well at least he'll be entertaining.

Townsend

Quote from: carltonplace on November 07, 2012, 09:25:08 AM
His victory speach made me want to duck under the sofa. Well at least he'll be entertaining.

He's going to spend his term ensuring that Obama will only be a 2 term president.

Conan71

Quote from: Townsend on November 06, 2012, 09:54:19 PM
His acceptance call to war on the federal government was a bucket of crazy.

He was interviewed on KRMG this morning and apparently was still drunk on the Tea Party passion punch:

-Deficit
-Debt
-Obamacare
-Socialist agenda
-Attack on family values

You get the rest.  Four more years of gridlock.

I'm hoping now that Obama doesn't have to worry about winning another term, he will be more open to compromise which does not have to include a tax increase at every turn as part of his compromise.

Quote from: Townsend on November 07, 2012, 09:27:55 AM
He's going to spend his term ensuring that Obama will only be a 2 term president.

We need a "like" button on here.
"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan

sgrizzle

Quote from: Conan71 on November 07, 2012, 09:34:00 AM
He was interviewed on KRMG this morning and apparently was still drunk on the Tea Party passion punch:

-Deficit
-Debt
-Obamacare
-Socialist agenda
-Attack on family values

You get the rest.  Four more years of gridlock.

I'm hoping now that Obama doesn't have to worry about winning another term, he will be more open to compromise which does not have to include a tax increase at every turn as part of his compromise.


nathanm

#20
Quote from: Conan71 on November 07, 2012, 09:34:00 AM
I'm hoping now that Obama doesn't have to worry about winning another term, he will be more open to compromise which does not have to include a tax increase at every turn as part of his compromise.

It isn't compromise if only one side gets things that they want. It's OK. He's (hopefully) going to be schooled in what compromise actually means after the sequester bomb goes off. Obama and the Senate Dems will be negotiating from a position of strength since the Democrats basically get what they want, just sooner than they think is appropriate for the economy. Maybe the Tea Partiers who forced Boehner to scuttle the deal he and Obama had made will learn that it's best to accept it when you win instead of trying to get even more.
"Labor is prior to and independent of capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration" --Abraham Lincoln

heironymouspasparagus

Quote from: Conan71 on November 07, 2012, 09:34:00 AM

I'm hoping now that Obama doesn't have to worry about winning another term, he will be more open to compromise which does not have to include a tax increase at every turn as part of his compromise.



You can't possibly think that we can continue without a revenue component??

Which is MOST likely to be letting Bush tax cuts expire.  And then massaging the system a little bit.



"So he brandished a gun, never shot anyone or anything right?"  --TeeDub, 17 Feb 2018.

I don't share my thoughts because I think it will change the minds of people who think differently.  I share my thoughts to show the people who already think like me that they are not alone.

Conan71

Quote from: heironymouspasparagus on November 07, 2012, 08:40:33 PM

You can't possibly think that we can continue without a revenue component??

Which is MOST likely to be letting Bush tax cuts expire.  And then massaging the system a little bit.


Any idea how much more revenue would be generated with 23 million unemployed and underemployed getting real employment?
"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan

nathanm

Quote from: Conan71 on November 07, 2012, 09:28:05 PM
Any idea how much more revenue would be generated with 23 million unemployed and underemployed getting real employment?

Not enough. I can say that with confidence because we were running deficits before the supplementary appropriations for Afghanistan and Iraq even during the peak years of the economy under Bush.
"Labor is prior to and independent of capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration" --Abraham Lincoln

Red Arrow

Quote from: nathanm on November 07, 2012, 10:10:25 PM
Not enough. I can say that with confidence because we were running deficits before the supplementary appropriations for Afghanistan and Iraq even during the peak years of the economy under Bush.

Do you really think that merely eliminating the Bush tax cuts on only the 1%ers will be "enough"? 

I don't.
 

Hoss

I'm guessing not.  But what is the harm in letting them expire?  They'd just go back to the effective tax rate they had during the Clinton years.  We all know how financially dire THOSE years were.

::)

Red Arrow

Quote from: Hoss on November 07, 2012, 10:23:28 PM
I'm guessing not.  But what is the harm in letting them expire?  They'd just go back to the effective tax rate they had during the Clinton years.  We all know how financially dire THOSE years were.

::)

Jimmy Carter could have ridden the financial bubble given to Clinton.  Manufacturing in the US was already on the way down before Bush was elected in 2000.

Harm? I expect they will be "allowed" to expire so we will find out.  I wish us all good luck but hope I can keep working for a few more years so I can keep my toys when I retire.
 

Red Arrow

Quote from: Townsend on November 07, 2012, 09:27:55 AM
He's going to spend his term ensuring that Obama will only be a 2 term president.

I expect he will be successful.   :D
 

Teatownclown

I expect a toe tapping incident.

Don't ask, don't tell. ;D

nathanm

Quote from: Red Arrow on November 07, 2012, 10:31:24 PM
Jimmy Carter could have ridden the financial bubble given to Clinton.

The economy (and job growth) was strong long before the financial bubble. The point, of course, being that just about any tax rate won't stop the economy presuming it's not high enough to suck more money out of the economy than it can sustain. Think of it as a tool to help keep inflation under control if you like.
"Labor is prior to and independent of capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration" --Abraham Lincoln