News:

Long overdue maintenance happening. See post in the top forum.

Main Menu

FCC proposes large public WiFi networks

Started by Townsend, February 04, 2013, 11:05:06 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Conan71

Quote from: Townsend on February 05, 2013, 09:03:34 AM
How do you see this as the government taking over the internet?



Well there is the whole "The federal government wants to create super WiFi networks across the nation" and free access to the internet thing.  The article seems to indicate that would be exactly what would happen unless the article was poorly written or my critical reading skills have gone to pot.
"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan

Townsend

Quote from: Conan71 on February 05, 2013, 10:39:10 AM
Well there is the whole "The federal government wants to create super WiFi networks across the nation" and free access to the internet thing.  The article seems to indicate that would be exactly what would happen unless the article was poorly written or my critical reading skills have gone to pot.

You mean by allowing access for the general public?

QuoteThe airwaves that FCC officials want to hand over to the public would be much more powerful than existing WiFi networks that have become common in households. They could penetrate thick concrete walls and travel over hills and around trees. If all goes as planned, free access to the Web would be available in just about every metropolitan area and in many rural areas.

I'm not seeing the conspiracies here.


Gaspar

Quote from: Conan71 on February 05, 2013, 10:39:10 AM
Well there is the whole "The federal government wants to create super WiFi networks across the nation" and free access to the internet thing.  The article seems to indicate that would be exactly what would happen unless the article was poorly written or my critical reading skills have gone to pot.

When attacked by a mob of clowns, always go for the juggler.

Gaspar

Quote from: Townsend on February 05, 2013, 10:44:02 AM
You mean by allowing access for the general public?

I'm not seeing the conspiracies here.



That's the point.  There are no conspiracies.  The intent is quite well spelled out.
When attacked by a mob of clowns, always go for the juggler.

Townsend

Quote from: Gaspar on February 05, 2013, 10:45:38 AM
That's the point.  There are no conspiracies.  The intent is quite well spelled out.

Yes, I see how that is horrible.

Gaspar

Quote from: Townsend on February 05, 2013, 10:47:52 AM
Yes, I see how that is horrible.

Towney, we perceive the bandwidth available today as significant and amazing, just as we thought a 9600 modem was freekin amazing when we replaced our 1200s.
Take private industry out of the equation, and you will retard innovation, and ultimately make access less affordable and highly regulated. Government will not simply flip a switch on transceivers and walk away.  They will either build enormous bureaucracies and commissions, or they will subsidize existing providers to provide the service.  When that happens all incentive to advance technology slows or halts, and subsidized providers for equipment and service become monopolistic.  

Not really sure why we keep having to learn this lesson, but I suppose it's not a popular subject in schools any more.

When attacked by a mob of clowns, always go for the juggler.

Townsend

Quote from: Gaspar on February 05, 2013, 10:58:12 AM
Towney, we perceive the bandwidth available today as significant and amazing, just as we thought a 9600 modem was freekin amazing when we replaced our 1200s.
Take private industry out of the equation, and you will retard innovation, and ultimately make access less affordable and highly regulated. Government will not simply flip a switch on transceivers and walk away.  They will either build enormous bureaucracies and commissions, or they will subsidize existing providers to provide the service.  When that happens all incentive to advance technology slows or halts, and subsidized providers for equipment and service become monopolistic.  

Not really sure why we keep having to learn this lesson, but I suppose it's not a popular subject in schools any more.



This is in addition to the existing...are you reading a different article?

Conan71

Quote from: Townsend on February 05, 2013, 11:05:59 AM
This is in addition to the existing...are you reading a different article?

But the argument is that it could possibly interfere with or cripple existing 4G signal.  And if a fast wi-fi is available for free, why would anyone in their right mind still pay for a private service?
"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan

Townsend

Quote from: Conan71 on February 05, 2013, 11:18:04 AM
But the argument is that it could possibly interfere with or cripple existing 4G signal.  And if a fast wi-fi is available for free, why would anyone in their right mind still pay for a private service?

It's in the article.


heironymouspasparagus

Quote from: Gaspar on February 05, 2013, 07:40:39 AM
Why on Earth would anyone want the government to take over internet service????????


Who said anything about taking over the internet?  It is a proposal to provide the service on a wide basis.  Wouldn't stop you or anyone else from getting their own if you thought there was a benefit above and beyond...
 

By the way, you do remember where the whole internet thing came from don't you?  The government....

"So he brandished a gun, never shot anyone or anything right?"  --TeeDub, 17 Feb 2018.

I don't share my thoughts because I think it will change the minds of people who think differently.  I share my thoughts to show the people who already think like me that they are not alone.

Gaspar

Quote from: heironymouspasparagus on February 05, 2013, 11:36:23 AM

 

By the way, you do remember where the whole internet thing came from don't you?  The government....



If they had known it would become an unregulated tool of commerce, I believe that would be very different today.  ;)
When attacked by a mob of clowns, always go for the juggler.

Red Arrow

Quote from: Conan71 on February 05, 2013, 11:18:04 AM
And if a fast wi-fi is available for free, why would anyone in their right mind still pay for a private service?

We could make it free only if someone qualifies for Food Stamps.
 

Townsend

Quote from: Conan71 on February 05, 2013, 11:18:04 AM
And if a fast wi-fi is available for free, why would anyone in their right mind still pay for a private service?

What's wrong with using the free wifi?

Gaspar

When attacked by a mob of clowns, always go for the juggler.

Townsend

Quote from: Gaspar on February 05, 2013, 02:08:15 PM


I'm sure everyone's pleased that you are against open free wifi.

I'm sure it's big government, poor people, or someone on welfare who's out to get you.