prediction time...who will be the next Governor?

[Tulsasooner78]

p 16 election:

Oklahoma County:
51.7% of votes or 141,429 for Trump
41.2% of votes or 112,662 for Clinton
7% of votes or 29,529 for the independent candidate

Tulsa County: 
58.4% of votes or 144,000 for Trump
35.6% of votes or 87,663 for Clinton
6% of votes or 14,909 for the independent candidate

Cleveland County:
57% of votes or 62,469 for Trump
35% of votes or 38,790 for Clinton
8% of votes or 8,068 for the independent

These were the numbers I posted from politico.   They are 100% correct.   I never posted incorrect info.  Own it.

[heironymouspasparagus]

p 16 election:

Oklahoma County:
51.7% of votes or 141,429 for Trump
41.2% of votes or 112,662 for Clinton
7% of votes or 29,529 for the independent candidate

Tulsa County: 
58.4% of votes or 144,000 for Trump
35.6% of votes or 87,663 for Clinton
6% of votes or 14,909 for the independent candidate

Cleveland County:
57% of votes or 62,469 for Trump
35% of votes or 38,790 for Clinton
8% of votes or 8,068 for the independent

These were the numbers I posted from politico.   They are 100% correct.   I never posted incorrect info.  Own it.

Guess my link is a different politico than the one you are looking at...

Your numbers;

7% of votes or 29,529 for the independent candidate


How does that resolve with the results shown at the link I referenced;

Oklahoma County

100% Reporting

R D. Trump   51.7%   141,429
D H. Clinton   41.2%   112,661
L G. Johnson   7.1%   19,519



Own away...

[Oil Capital]

Guess my link is a different politico than the one you are looking at...

Your numbers;

7% of votes or 29,529 for the independent candidate


How does that resolve with the results shown at the link I referenced;

Oklahoma County

100% Reporting

R D. Trump   51.7%   141,429
D H. Clinton   41.2%   112,661
L G. Johnson   7.1%   19,519



Own away...

The only thing Tulsasooner got wrong was that he overstated the number of votes for Gary Johnson.  The percentages he presented were correct. Funny that you are now attempting to blame your wild overstatements on Tulsasooner's rather minor keystroke error on reproducing the vote count.

[Tulsasooner78]

Go read your absolute replies regarding OKC.   You are the typical ignorant Tulsa dude.   Own it.

[Tulsasooner78]

dude not dude

[heironymouspasparagus]

The only thing Tulsasooner got wrong was that he overstated the number votes for Gary Johnson.  The percentages he presented were correct. Funny that you are now attempting to blame your wild overstatements on Tulsasooner's rather minor keystroke error on reproducing the vote count.

Didn't read reply 55, huh?

[heironymouspasparagus]

Go read your absolute replies regarding OKC.   You are the typical ignorant Tulsa dude.   Own it.

Awww.   Poor little OKC dude feeling... something... ??

[Tulsasooner78]

You are trash.   An absolute deplorable POS. 

[Oil Capital]

Didn't read reply 55, huh?

Yes, I most certainly did.  Didn't get the point that his percentages were correct, did you?

And how was his mistyping to blame for your wild misstatements?  Even if you use his misstated vote total for Johnson, your [imaginary] "red" vote in Oklahoma County would only have been 60%, not the  65% you invented.

[Tulsasooner78]

You are a complete hypocrite.   You go on and on about the deplorable ignorant republicans yet you spew vile inaccuracies that support your ignorant opinions. 

[heironymouspasparagus]

You are trash.   An absolute deplorable POS.  

Wow!   Catchy comeback!!  Think up all those big syllables by yourself, or did someone help you??  Trump inspiration going on there.  That's ok.  Just what one would expect from a Sooner....lol.

[heironymouspasparagus]

Yes, I most certainly did.  Didn't get the point that his percentages were correct, did you?

And how was his mistyping to blame for your wild misstatements?  Even if you use his misstated vote total for Johnson, your [imaginary] "red" vote in Oklahoma County would only have been 60%, not the  65% you invented.

I "owned" that I made math mistakes - using his first set of numbers...I should have gone to politico first without accepting anything he has to say, but I messed up.  

As for percentages - well the 7% quoted for Johnson is wrong for at least one of the numbers...one is actually about 10.41%.  Which added to 51.7% gives us 62.11% 'right' leaning votes.  Compared to the approx 42% more left leaning.  I made a math mistake and rounded up to 65%.  You rounded down to 60%.  From the real 62.111466%.   "Wild overstatements".  Ok,...(shoulders shrugged)




 

[heironymouspasparagus]

You are a complete hypocrite.   You go on and on about the deplorable ignorant republicans yet you spew vile inaccuracies that support your ignorant opinions.  

Huge inaccuracies!!   65% versus 62.111466%!!  Massive!!!  And vile!!!   

[Oil Capital]

I "owned" that I made math mistakes - using his first set of numbers...I should have gone to politico first without accepting anything he has to say, but I messed up.  

As for percentages - well the 7% quoted for Johnson is wrong for at least one of the numbers...one is actually about 10.41%.  Which added to 51.7% gives us 62.11% 'right' leaning votes.  Compared to the approx 42% more left leaning.  I made a math mistake and rounded up to 65%.  You rounded down to 60%.  From the real 62.111466%.   "Wild overstatements".  Ok,...(shoulders shrugged)

You do struggle with math, don't you?  Apparently you didn't notice you've come up with 104.11% of the vote.  I confess to having rounded down, when doing the calculation using Tulsasooners mistyped numbers. I rounded down from 60.27713% to 60%.

[Oil Capital]

Huge inaccuracies!!   65% versus 62.111466%!!  Massive!!!  And vile!!!   

65% vs 58.8%, but who's counting?