Breaking: TPD responses only to verified alarms

[makelifebetter4ok]

ONLY on Our T-World.

[RecycleMichael]

The alarm companies have caused this problem. They call police to investigate and 98.7% of the time it is a false alarm.

They have created a business where they get paid and then make the public pick up the tab responding to false alarms.

Why should my tax dollars pay for a system that is so poorly operated? The KTUL story says that there were 24,000 alarm calls last year and only 312 were actual problems.

I want the police to do more important things than to repond to 23,688 false alarms.

[patric]

" Less than 6 months later on March 25, 2005, Milwaukee's Police Chief Nannette Hegerty is already calling the program a success at the same time she's calling for a new ordinance banning homeowners and business owners from checking on their own homes or businesses when an alarm sounds. Chief Hegerty called the practice 'dangerous.'  "

I have to admit im a little concerned about any  ordinance that potentially compels a homeowner to confront a burglar before a call to the police is justified.  This one needs some work.

[MichaelC]

Private security.  Force the alarm companies to check their own alarms.  Pass the bill on to the owners.

[Hawkins]

B.S.

Business owners pay taxes for a police department.

What else are they doing in the middle of the night when most of these alarms go off? Who cares if most of them are false alarms, its not hurting anybody's tax dollars, its just interrupting late-night coffee and pancake-house breaks for the officers.

[MH2010]

quote:Originally posted by Hawkins

B.S.

Business owners pay taxes for a police department.

What else are they doing in the middle of the night when most of these alarms go off? Who cares if most of them are false alarms, its not hurting anybody's tax dollars, its just interrupting late-night coffee and pancake-house breaks for the officers.

Well, in the middle of the night we respond to armed robberies, rapes, domestic violence calls, 1st degree burglaries, child abuse, child neglect, elderly abuse, people stranded on the side of the road, assist calls from OHP, homicides, SWIK's, Assaults, AWDW's, disturbances, and prowler calls. The response times to all of these type calls would improve if we didn't answer 23,688 false alarms.

[tulsa1603]

Why has everyone gone to the silent alarm?  Why not go back to the noisy audible alarms?  I can't imagine a thief hanging out in a house with a loud siren screaming for all the neighbors to hear.

[Steve]

How does an alarm company know if a tripped alarm is false or an actual break-in, without someone being there to inspect?  Several homes around me have had their home alarms go off over the past 5-6 years, and I have yet to see an alarm company representative or a TPD officer show up to investigate.  TPD simply does not have the manpower to check out all the alarm calls.
I think the best a homeowner can hope is the noise from an alarm will alert the neighbors and scare off any potential intruders.  I would not expect a police response.
Yes tulsa1603, I have at least one neighbor that has converted from a silent to audible alarm.  Silent alarms, in light of the TPD manpower situation, seem a waste of money to me.

[nsugrad_05]

quote:Originally posted by MH2010

quote:Originally posted by Hawkins

B.S.

Business owners pay taxes for a police department.

What else are they doing in the middle of the night when most of these alarms go off? Who cares if most of them are false alarms, its not hurting anybody's tax dollars, its just interrupting late-night coffee and pancake-house breaks for the officers.

Well, in the middle of the night we respond to armed robberies, rapes, domestic violence calls, 1st degree burglaries, child abuse, child neglect, elderly abuse, people stranded on the side of the road, assist calls from OHP, homicides, SWIK's, Assaults, AWDW's, disturbances, and prowler calls. The response times to all of these type calls would improve if we didn't answer 23,688 false alarms.

Amen, MH. You kept me from typing the same thing. But, you forget about snagging drunk drivers to help keep the taxpayers alive, and with reasonable insurance rates. At least the TPD has an alarm permit system. Out in the cuunty we still respond to the all alarms that go off every night at the same time, with the same trip information.

[patric]

A paragraph on FOX23:
http://www.fox23.com/news/local/story.aspx?content_id=383b72ad-838b-4337-9e7e-ee195aa0bfbb

a little more on 6:
http://www.kotv.com/news/local/story/?id=117508

[sgrizzle]

I have an alarm and TPD has only come out once. I was out of town as was any family who could check it for me, so TPD went out "at their leisure" just to make sure it was false. If TPD wanted to charge $50 for such a service, that would be fine too.

If an alarm has to be verifiable as true, why would you need an alarm?

[RecycleMichael]

Technology can save us on this.

Alarm companies can find reasonable ways to verify an alarm besides just calling the cops that motion detector went off or someone knocked hard on a door.

A camera system can be installed to be verification for just a few dollars more or two separate alarms (a window, door or motion detector) could be considered verification.

I think an audible alarm, a nosy neighbor and a well trained dog is the best combination.

[rwarn17588]

A noisy dog is the best burglar alarm. I live in Red Fork, and nobody has any break-ins because there are barking dogs all over the place that start bellowing if anything's amiss.

[patric]

quote:Originally posted by recyclemichael

Technology can save us on this.

More up-to-date alarms contain programs to help verify their own reports, by analyzing sequences of violations to help distinguish a burglar's progress through a protected premises from that of a door being rattled by the wind.

This maker features Cross Zone reporting that "provides an additional report to the central station about events on the premises.  The cross zone police code is transmitted when there are two different alarms during any armed-to-armed period."  

An exterior door or window opening isnt conclusive of a burglary, but if it is immediately followed by interior motion detection or the opening of interior doors, you can bet it isnt just the wind.    

I can realistically see response times being adjusted in accordance to more thorough reporting by either neighbors or the system itself, but god help us when someone is killed verifying their own alarm or because police downgraded their response.

[rwarn17588]

God forbid if *anyone's* killed over *anything.*

But when you've got more than 98 percent of burglar alarms going off for no good reason, then something has to be done. You can't have cops running willy-nilly all over the place for the possibility of that 1.5 percent when there are obviously more pressing concerns.

It sounds like this is a problem for the alarm companies to solve. Or get yourselves a noisy dog.