News:

Long overdue maintenance happening. See post in the top forum.

Main Menu

Should Siegfried be reappointed to TAA?

Started by Wrinkle, August 07, 2007, 07:54:55 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

waterboy

quote:
Originally posted by Vision 2025

quote:
Originally posted by Conan71

What sucks about the AA grant to build a waste water treatment system is that many smaller, but vital plating and metal finishing  operations went out of business over the years because they could not afford to install a WWT system and there was ZERO help from the state, city, or county.  AA could have easily paid for this upgrade out of their own funds.



Obviously anything I say or input you will have issue with[B)].  In this instance, I was simply correcting an errant post and pointing out that AA has done more than just add tooling.  

With these particular improvements they (AA)  provided an added benefit to the community and our enviroment by developing a long term solution to the waste stream they generate in the course of being the areas largest employer and yes closing injection wells with funds provided to them by an overwhelming majority vote of Tulsa County... but from following this site and responding to comments over the past couple of years I fully understand that many who are the most active on this site simply can't accept that Vision 2025 did in fact PASS[:(!].





A responsible, good neighbor would have spent his own money to clean up after himself instead of asking the public to do it at their cost. Just because they're the largest employer doesn't negate their responsibility for cleaning up after themselves. Once again, other than Recylemike, how many people knew we were paying for AA to flush their own toilet.

Vision 2025

quote:
Originally posted by waterboy

quote:
Originally posted by Vision 2025

quote:
Originally posted by Conan71

What sucks about the AA grant to build a waste water treatment system is that many smaller, but vital plating and metal finishing  operations went out of business over the years because they could not afford to install a WWT system and there was ZERO help from the state, city, or county.  AA could have easily paid for this upgrade out of their own funds.



Obviously anything I say or input you will have issue with[B)].  In this instance, I was simply correcting an errant post and pointing out that AA has done more than just add tooling.  

With these particular improvements they (AA)  provided an added benefit to the community and our enviroment by developing a long term solution to the waste stream they generate in the course of being the areas largest employer and yes closing injection wells with funds provided to them by an overwhelming majority vote of Tulsa County... but from following this site and responding to comments over the past couple of years I fully understand that many who are the most active on this site simply can't accept that Vision 2025 did in fact PASS[:(!].





A responsible, good neighbor would have spent his own money to clean up after himself instead of asking the public to do it at their cost. Just because they're the largest employer doesn't negate their responsibility for cleaning up after themselves. Once again, other than Recylemike, how many people knew we were paying for AA to flush their own toilet.



AA management asked if we thought this was suitable use Vision funds before proceeding with this multi million dollar environmental improvement.  It was enthusiastically approved because it went much farther than simply qualifying for Vision funding as a capital project that enhanced the Tulsa Base either by stabilizing existing jobs or by enhancing the potential for new work it went a long way towards being a good steward as those wells had a couple of years still on the permit and they were not all that deep.  

Once again, no good deed goes unpunished... especially around here.


Vision 2025 Program Director - know the facts, www.Vision2025.info

Conan71

quote:
Originally posted by Vision 2025

quote:
Originally posted by Conan71

What sucks about the AA grant to build a waste water treatment system is that many smaller, but vital plating and metal finishing  operations went out of business over the years because they could not afford to install a WWT system and there was ZERO help from the state, city, or county.  AA could have easily paid for this upgrade out of their own funds.



Obviously anything I say or input you will have issue with[B)].  In this instance, I was simply correcting an errant post and pointing out that AA has done more than just add tooling.  

With these particular improvements they (AA)  provided an added benefit to the community and our enviroment by developing a long term solution to the waste stream they generate in the course of being the areas largest employer and yes closing injection wells with funds provided to them by an overwhelming majority vote of Tulsa County... but from following this site and responding to comments over the past couple of years I fully understand that many who are the most active on this site simply can't accept that Vision 2025 did in fact PASS[:(!].





I don't know how you wound up with such cynical comments toward me.  I didn't once say that "Vision 20/25 is indicative of the prevailing myopia of this area."  I'm not a consistent naysayer of V-2025, but there are some vagaries in this plan that leave a lot of us in the dark as to what was intended and what is actually being delivered.

AA had an impending obligation when their permit expired.  They could have easily done what every other major aerospace company has had to do around the country and build their own WWT system with their own money.  The taxpayers had no obligation to fund the improvements.  AA wasn't going to leave town over having to fund their own in-house WWT plant.

We are going to wind up with some great things from V-2025, but you will have to pardon me if there are people like Waterboy and myself who are miffed that many other companies who used to employ Tulsans and bring money into the local economy have vanished because they weren't given funds nor any sort of governmetal cooperation to make necessary improvements in order to stay in business.

quote:

I fully understand that many who are the most active on this site simply can't accept that Vision 2025 did in fact PASS[:(!].



Nice end zone dance.

Care to jump over to any of the various river tax/development threads and explain to us plebes what the low water dam funding entailed in V-2025?
"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first" -Ronald Reagan

waterboy

quote:
Originally posted by Vision 2025

quote:
Originally posted by waterboy

quote:
Originally posted by Vision 2025

quote:
Originally posted by Conan71

What sucks about the AA grant to build a waste water treatment system is that many smaller, but vital plating and metal finishing  operations went out of business over the years because they could not afford to install a WWT system and there was ZERO help from the state, city, or county.  AA could have easily paid for this upgrade out of their own funds.



Obviously anything I say or input you will have issue with[B)].  In this instance, I was simply correcting an errant post and pointing out that AA has done more than just add tooling.  

With these particular improvements they (AA)  provided an added benefit to the community and our enviroment by developing a long term solution to the waste stream they generate in the course of being the areas largest employer and yes closing injection wells with funds provided to them by an overwhelming majority vote of Tulsa County... but from following this site and responding to comments over the past couple of years I fully understand that many who are the most active on this site simply can't accept that Vision 2025 did in fact PASS[:(!].





A responsible, good neighbor would have spent his own money to clean up after himself instead of asking the public to do it at their cost. Just because they're the largest employer doesn't negate their responsibility for cleaning up after themselves. Once again, other than Recylemike, how many people knew we were paying for AA to flush their own toilet.



AA management asked if we thought this was suitable use Vision funds before proceeding with this multi million dollar environmental improvement.  It was enthusiastically approved because it went much farther than simply qualifying for Vision funding as a capital project that enhanced the Tulsa Base either by stabilizing existing jobs or by enhancing the potential for new work it went a long way towards being a good steward as those wells had a couple of years still on the permit and they were not all that deep.  

Once again, no good deed goes unpunished... especially around here.






Especially good deeds like that one. My heart pumps peanut butter for you. All you good hearted stewards wanted to do was respond enthusiastically to one of the big boys who didn't need the money, but saw the trough being built and probably thought, "might as well ask...".

shadows

From the day AA moved to Tulsa there has been a quite sucking of the taxpayer fund all in the name of progress.  Even the providing of 90 some million dollars in revenue bonds for completion of facilities in another state.   At present I believe that the taxpayer subsidizes the water and electricity used.  The burbs are very happy with the arrangement as most of the employees make their homes there.  

One can just see an official of AA asking the distributors of the 2025 money if it was alright for them to take it.
.
The majority of the taxpayers voted for 2025 but they surely did not read what it could be used for.
Today we stand in ecstasy and view that we build today'
Tomorrow we will enter into the plea to have it torn away.

cannon_fodder

Vision 2025 did indeed pass, I voted for it.  I still support it.  I support the river tax (I think).

And I knew a large sum of money was being given to AA for capital improvements.  But it was sold as a measure to bring more jobs to Tulsa (especially the Dreamliner business).  Though it may have been in the writing, it certainly was not sold as a way to pay for AA to enter the 20th century and treat their waste water.  That might not have necessarily deterred me, but I'm afraid I agree with the assessment that this was a handout to get AA to where they should have been to start with. (And hey, can my company have a few million if I increase my employment by 3% and promise not to fire too many people?  We even had to pay for our own drainage system when we expanded.)

I guess I might just be disgruntled because I hate AA's "service" and get screwed by them all the time.  Add to that their extraction of funds from our citizens under threat of losing jobs and I get more aggravated.  Too bad we are so heavily invested and committed to them, they seem like a corporate citizen we could do without (anyone from AA reading this, feel free to step up and fund the renovation of the old Arena if you want to disprove me).

I do appreciate your presence though 2025... good to get an insiders view.  Do pop over to the river thread, I'm confused by that and I dont know if its because I wasnt paying attention or what.
- - - - - - - - -
I crush grooves.

Wrinkle

It's on the Agenda for this Thursday's Council Meeting, item 2D.

I vote "NO".

Vision 2025

quote:
Originally posted by cannon_fodder

Vision 2025 did indeed pass, I voted for it.  I still support it.  I support the river tax (I think).

And I knew a large sum of money was being given to AA for capital improvements.  But it was sold as a measure to bring more jobs to Tulsa (especially the Dreamliner business).  Though it may have been in the writing, it certainly was not sold as a way to pay for AA to enter the 20th century and treat their waste water.  That might not have necessarily deterred me, but I'm afraid I agree with the assessment that this was a handout to get AA to where they should have been to start with. (And hey, can my company have a few million if I increase my employment by 3% and promise not to fire too many people?  We even had to pay for our own drainage system when we expanded.)

I guess I might just be disgruntled because I hate AA's "service" and get screwed by them all the time.  Add to that their extraction of funds from our citizens under threat of losing jobs and I get more aggravated.  Too bad we are so heavily invested and committed to them, they seem like a corporate citizen we could do without (anyone from AA reading this, feel free to step up and fund the renovation of the old Arena if you want to disprove me).

I do appreciate your presence though 2025... good to get an insiders view.  Do pop over to the river thread, I'm confused by that and I dont know if its because I wasnt paying attention or what.

 To the last paragraph: Thank you and I will see if I can answer some river questions.
Vision 2025 Program Director - know the facts, www.Vision2025.info

Wrinkle