McCain Dirty Laundry

[Rico]

quote:Originally posted by jamesrage

So NYT times made printed a article based on no supporting evidence what so ever to back up their claims?Talk about yellow journalism.

Since they like printing stories with basis in fact other than he said she said here is a story they might to print.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=sVeFVtcdSYY


Hey.... Jimmy... chill they were just trying to emulate Bill O.........

[Gaspar]

I just realized that if this is true, it's probably going to make a bunch of Clinton supporters vote for him!

[Conan71]

I think even the far right is becoming less disappointed with marital infidelity in the GOP ranks.

Even the media analyst groups are starting to say this was gutter journalism.

[Breadburner]

quote:Originally posted by FOTD

quote:Originally posted by jamesrage

So NYT times made printed a article based on no supporting evidence what so ever to back up their claims?Talk about yellow journalism.

Since they like printing stories with basis in fact other than he said she said here is a story they might to print.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=sVeFVtcdSYY

MODERATOR!

Looks like Obama might get Lewinskied.....This dude might have a cumberbun with Obama's DNA on it.....Pun intended.....

[FOTD]

quote:Originally posted by jamesrage

So NYT times made printed a article based on no supporting evidence what so ever to back up their claims?Talk about yellow journalism.

Since they like printing stories with basis in fact other than he said she said here is a story they might to print.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=sVeFVtcdSYY

"Please, recognize the junk you are receiving, whether in emails and internet talk boards (anonymous), or in the airwaves (dominated by conservative infrastructure), as the manipulative misinformation and misdirection that it is."

[YoungTulsan]

Time timing does seem suspect.   FOTD's theory that they didn't want Huck or Romney to benefit from this seems plausible.  They actually praised Mccain and endorsed him before this - Now that Huc & Romney are out of the way, they run with the hit piece.  But are they just trying to take out the Republican, or are they trying to set up a 3rd party opportunity (Republican nominee destroyed as soon as the results are finalizing) - Attacking now instead of in October makes me wonder if that is not the case: Opening the door for either a Bloomberg, or a strong conservative figure to run 3rd party.

Another idea I've had, which is a little more far-fetched, is that bringing this dirt up right now is actually a calculated move to get the talk radio wannabe conservatives rallying around Mccain again.  I couldn't believe my ears today hearing Hannity defending Mccain like someone had questioned his own mother's honor.  The evil liberal newspaper is putting out false slander!  This is ridiculous!  Mccain is a saint!!!!  That seemed to be the gist of it.  I know it was inevitable, but this just sped up the hypocrasy and rallied them back around Mccain all the sooner.

We'll just have to sit back and see who benefits

[Conan71]

quote:Originally posted by jamesrage

So NYT times made printed a article based on no supporting evidence what so ever to back up their claims?Talk about yellow journalism.

Since they like printing stories with basis in fact other than he said she said here is a story they might to print.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=sVeFVtcdSYY

Here's another good one:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=c_wRb8J_bjM&feature=related

[RecycleMichael]

I think the republicans are actually happy for this McCain sex/lobbyist scandal. First, it involved an attractive woman. The republican scandals lately have involved mostly pedophiles and gay sex.  

Secondly, it involved flights on airplanes and public appearances. These are way better than airport bathrooms.

Lastly, she was a lobbyist. It was all about doing business.

[Conan71]

Really I think this Larry Sinclair fellow would be the perfect Democrat candidate.

At least he's honest about his gayness and drug use, unlike the fellow he's accusing of such behavior.

Truth from a Democrat, now that would be refreshing.

[FOTD]

quote:Originally posted by Conan71

Really I think this Larry Sinclair fellow would be the perfect Democrat candidate.

At least he's honest about his gayness and drug use, unlike the fellow he's accusing of such behavior.

Truth from a Democrat, now that would be refreshing.

ANOTHER REPUBLIJERK.....GOP the party of hypocrits and crooks:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/22/renzi.indictment/

[FOTD]

quote:Originally posted by Conan71

quote:Originally posted by jamesrage

So NYT times made printed a article based on no supporting evidence what so ever to back up their claims?Talk about yellow journalism.

Since they like printing stories with basis in fact other than he said she said here is a story they might to print.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=sVeFVtcdSYY

Here's another good one:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=c_wRb8J_bjM&feature=related

try this http://pabloonpolitics.com/mistress.htm

and these are funny! http://www.alternet.org/blogs/video/77361/

[Conan71]

"He stepped down from the House Intelligence Committee in April after the raid."

At least Renzi showed some measure of responsibility unlike our Democrap State Auditor Jeff McMahan who refuses to step down even though it's pretty well proven he's deep in the pockets with the Prince Of Darkness.  Lloyd Fields is next....

BTW- I prefer the term "Repug" far better than "Republijerk".

I do find it interesting how headlines are cobbled together.  They could have just as easily said "House Member Renzi Indicted..." I guarantee there was some guilt by association that played into that editor's headline since Renzi is from Arizona.  Got people to read it because they want to see if McCain had something to do with a scandal.  No amount of free Grateful Dead tickets would convince me otherwise.


Obama & Sinclair '08!

[USRufnex]

quote:Originally posted by Conan71

Really I think this Larry Sinclair fellow would be the perfect Democrat candidate.

At least he's honest about his gayness and drug use, unlike the fellow he's accusing of such behavior.

Truth from a Democrat, now that would be refreshing.

Truth?  You can't handle the truth...  [}:)]




Obama accuser has long rap sheet
By BEN SMITH | 6/18/08 7:58 AM EST  
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11164.html

WhiteHouse.com Larry Sinclair Polygraph Press Conference at National Press Club June 18 at 4:00 PM
http://whitehouse.com/

Obama Accuser Larry Sinclair Holds Stupefying Press Conference
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/18/obama-accuser-larry-sincl_n_107900.html

And pay Sinclair did -- for the venue and its microphone, as well as for a kilted lawyer (with a suspended license) named Montgomery Blair Sibley, who informed those assembled that his preferences in dress were arrived at as a way to secure comfort for his unusually large sexual organs. "I don't know why men wear pants," he said with a poker face. "It's a function of male genitalia. If you're size normal or smaller, you're probably comfortable with [pants]. ... Those at the other end of the spectrum find them quite confining."

"I asked him to wear a suit and tie," Mr. Sinclair said ruefully. Then, he admitted to suffering from a brain tumor.

Only slightly less mystifying were the several dozen assembled journalists who seemed to grant Mr. Sinclair some modicum of respect with their questions. They cross-examined his statement regarding his supposed meetings with the Illinois Democrat with a vigor and small-bore attention to detail that prosecutors reserve strictly for witnesses who are sane. Imagine if you were to encounter someone who had lit himself on fire, and then proceeded to ask which brand of gasoline he favored.

[RecycleMichael]

I gots to get me one of them kilts.

[FOTD]

No c untry for old men.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Euu_DMhsXQo